How to defeat jews - a guide 1. Stop following the god of the Torah 2. Win
>>546052754-
>>546052754—
Let's have a big discussion, here in this thread, about the overt anti-christian direction the fascist right has gone in.
>>546052958have you read The Revolution of Nihilism? Highly recommended.
It's pretty intense, the 180 you people have done from "pretending to be christian, in obvious pandering manner, in order to keep christians voting for fascism," to just "wow, now we're openly opposed to religion, and now we're just overtly Luciferians instead," I mean, it was a remarkable, whiplash-inducing 180. Just like the ones you people did on Epstein, inflation, foreign oil wars, and much, much more.
>>546053076No. I don't know what this means. Please don't respond to me with idiot-tier comments of "have you read [X obscure book no one cares about or will read]" Like for real, just put whatever point of view you have into your post, man. For fuck's sake, here.
>>546053156>Man is ever craving for a “beyond” and cannot live without an ideal of some kind, as a beacon and a consolation. At the same time, no average man, even in our age of universal education, could be entrusted with truths too metaphysical, too subtle for his mind to comprehend, without the danger of an imminent reaction setting in, and faith in Gods and Saints making room for an unscientific blank Atheism. No real philanthropist, hence no Occultist, would dream for a moment of a mankind without one tittle of Religion. Even the modern day Religion in Europe, confined to Sundays, is better than none.–The Secret Doctrine, H.P. Blavatsky
>>546053217It's an old book... the right have been nihilists for a long time now. Whatever position they adopt is merely camouflage for the Will to Power. Don't make the mistake of thinking they actually care about their own race.
>>546052754>cherry-picked verses don’t mention rape at allNice one OP
>>546053280None of this has anything to do, with anything I posted. It's just empty, anti-religious occultist elitism.And this is the real face of what's behind you fuckers here. Just complete Luciferianism.Complete disdain for the religion which you previously pandered to, and pretended to believe in, even though it was obvious that you did not.
>>546053403Numbers 31 - “Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man” KYS
>>546053370Please don't do this thing now where you pretend to be a "leftist Luciferian" here on /pol/. The grift you're trying to pull off to represent leftists as "Luciferians", or whatever, is completely clear, and this is not what we are, as leftists. This is the nature of your politics, as fascists, to comport yourselves as christians publicly, but then to promote your occultist Luciferian agenda, in private.
>>546053489>Make trouble, fail, make trouble again, fail again... until their doom – that is the logic of the imperialists and all reactionaries the world over in dealing with the people's cause and they will never go against this logic. This is a Marxist law. When we say "imperialism is ferocious", we mean that its nature will never change, that the imperialists will never lay down their butcher knives, that they will never become Buddhas, till their doom. Fight, fail, fight again, fail again, fight again... until their victory; that is the logic of the people, and they too will never go against this logic. This is another Marxist law. The Russian people's revolution followed this law, and so has the Chinese people's revolution. –Mao Zedong
>>546052919#
>>546053606I'm not pretending.
>>546053577The part of the bible here is referencing the Midianites, who pillaged, murdered and famined the Israelites, for generations.
>>546053577What part of that mentions rape? It says to kill the males and the females who aren't virgins, but the virgins are to be taken as captives. You're implying rape into it as you read.
>>546053606https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI6gMkfRjE0
>>546053695Obviously you are. Explicitly an easily disprovable grift too, because you're doing it on a fucking tripcode, with a massive history of posting clear basicbitch /pol/ fascism, and anti-semitic content. Please, just cut your endless, constant deception out.FFS, you fucks are just constantly trying to LARP as your leftist political opposition, and misrepresent us as everything which we're not. And it's classic "Every accusation is a confession", too. Cuz this board clearly opposes religion whenever they feel they can politically get away with it, without hemorrhaging christian voters for MIGA.
>>546053933I'm not "anti-Semitic", kike
>>546053933>>546053695You know, when you want to try to LARP as a leftist, "who's a Luciferian" in order to try to keep christians voting fro their own financial enslavement to your precious billionaires, by promoting every fascist MSM misrepresent of us, then try doing it without a papertrail. You filthy fascist Luciferian evil fucker.>https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/jew/tripcode/%21%21P38zFLDUYUh/page/1/
Hail Bastet, O Accuser who came forth from Imty Khent, I have not transgressed my nature, I have not washed away the image of a god.
>>546054091read the rest of my posts, kike.
>>546053976Well, there you go. There goes the "bruh, I'm totally a leftist, too! But let me just deliberately push my grift here, where I'm clearly intentionally trying to misrepresent leftists as Luciferians!" grift.You disgusting fucks will resort to literally any form of mendacity. Any form of fucking deception.
>>546052754Your last stronghold converted in 1413You lost
>>546054175I can tell you're full of shit and pretending to be a leftist, fyi. I know you're Jewish and attempting to confound truth.
>SOCIALISM IS WHEN YOU TURN THE OTHER CHEEK AND WORK TWICE AS HARD FOR YOUR MASTERSget the fuck out of here, kike.
As the leader of Leftism, I'm purging all the kikes ahead of time. There won't be another Trotsky, and there won't be "neocons" in the future. You're done here.
>>546053280Okay but you don't have to worship a circumcised rabbi
>>546053076>>546053370>>546053280>>546053606>>546053489I just hope the people who are reading this comments, which will probably be viewed by more people, because they're up at the top of the page, understand that this fuck who is pretending to a "leftist", in usual /pol/ fashion, in order to misrepresent us as being "Luciferian occultists", in the usual /pol/ misrepresentation of us, does not, in fact, hold the left-wing views he pretends to hold. And this is quite provable, because he's posting on a tripcope, and based upon his own viciously antisemitic post history, he's just a completely basicbitch /pol/ fascist.>https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/jew/tripcode/%21%21P38zFLDUYUh/page/1/Pretty clear, too, from these posts later on in this very thread even >>546054149, >>546053976.This is the type of fucking deception, which these fascist bastards perpetrate.
>>546054410We revere the Bodhisattvas, including Jesus.
>>546053489Your post, mr plebbit, is Heresy as well.
>>546052754Imagine being an antichristNo thanks, Jesus Christ Is King and demoralization spam is as impotent as its poster behind it
>>546053217He is one of the worse tripfags to plague this board, learn to filter the noise
>>546053030Gladly. Ultimately, what most /pol/ would-be-revolutionaries are is young faggots disillusioned with the society left to them by the older generations. The issue is that those older generations were the TRUE rebels that betrayed and fought against western society. The older generations are the ones who either abandoned or twisted scripture, so the /pol/ rebels-against-rebels, seeking an enemy to fight, find themselves at a crossroads between actually reading their Bible and rooting themselves in truth, latching onto false religions like Catholicism/Orthodoxy which market themselves as “older Christianity rooted in tradition”, or rebelling against twisted scripture by abandoning scripture entirely, (ironically just like their parents generation). The first option would be the correct path to take, but the latter two are easier and have WAY more propaganda/manpower on their side. /pol/ denizens advocate for “return to tradition”, but are over 100 years removed from the tradition they want to return to, so they cargo-cult while lashing out in angst at the generations that still had some connection to the tradition and rejected it.
>>546054425>A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells. –The Communist Manifesto
>>546054281>>546054229I love how you began this thread, with this completely usual LARPy /pol/ grift of "oo, I'm pretending to be a leftist, in order to misrepresent them as whatever horrific, and unpopular thing I want. In this case I'll do it as Luciferians, in order to keep the religious people voting against them, and voting for my precious fascism!" >>546053370, >>546053076, >>546053695, and then boom, the mask just completely fucking fell off. Every fascist perpetrates this deception.
Dear Jesus, Plz use your Heavenly powers to scurge the planet, for the final time, of the people who betray you. May the light of your Glory bring the cattle cars and mass cremation ovens to bring these war-mongering pests of the Earth to its ultimate demise.I pray this in the name of Jesus, Amen.
>>546054593>vote blueWe are revolutionaries and you are a liberal. You are not a leftist. Fascists have called you a leftist, but you're a liberal.
>>546052754t. rape demon jeet worshiper
leftism is when no mean words, leftism is when you never say the k-word (it means circle)
>>546054687>>546054924>>546054575Dude, it's over. The usual, completely predictable grift of "oooo, I'm pretending to be a leftist, in order to misrepresent them as Luciferians, in hopes of keeping religious people voting for my precious fascism!" has been exposed >>546054593, >>546054425.You must really think we're idiots. By "us" I mean religious people, because I am very much an actual leftist, communist, and I am, in fact, extremely, extremely, extremely, extremely religious.
>>546055130>>546054687>>546054924>>546054575Completely disgusting the degree of mendacity you people were always willing to resort to, with this bullshit, btw.
>>546055130how could i have been so stupid, throwing around the k-word like that. now nobody is going to vote for me. certainly not leftists, who would never oppose judaism. everybody knows leftists love jews!
i forgot that "leftism" is when you are christian and love jews. silly me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMzBtJheAG0
On another note....many people have been propagandized to believe "The Satanic Temple" is a "leftist, communist organization", or whatever. Look into it. Doug Mezner's a fascist, and the people funding it are all massive republican names. And even prominent e-celeb-type people like Milo Yiannopolous have been known to have many connections to them. The whole grift of pretending "leftists are le Luciferians!" is just another iteration of pic rel. The usual falseflagging. The usual deception from fascists.
wait a second. what was that phrase Jesus, who is God, used? SYNAGOGUE OF... something. I don't know
>>546053076Germany still had peasantry in the 1930s?
>>546055209Drop it, dude. It's over. Every time you people LARP on /pol/, in order to misrepresent your political opposition, it's not fooling anyone. FFS, everyone knows what you fucking people do, here. Everyone knows it's just infinite mendacity, and just infinite deception.
>>546055347contrary to what fascists may have told you, Hitler didn't end poverty, so yes. Book is "The Voice of Destruction" by Hermann Rauschning, by the way. Excellent reading
>>546055379>it's just infinite mendacity, and just infinite deception.you have a very jewish perspective on truth, as in you don't see it, and seemingly cannot recognize it, even when it's right in front of you. i know what you are.
>>546055432Dude, please drop the "pretending to be anti-fascist in order to misrepresent them as Luciferians" grift. You've been at it for a real long time, under this tripcode, according to your post history, and it's extremely clear that you're not actually a leftist, and that you are instead just trying to use the usual controlled opposition psychological operation grifts, in order to misrepresent your leftist political opposition as "Luciferian Occultists!!!!" or whatever else you find convenient, in any given opportunistic moment.
>>546055562My opposition to fascism is in fact consistent. Where's your post history?
>>546055528Look man, please just quit LARPing as us, on the left, in order to misrepresent us. All of your board. All over other internet platforms. All over your precious MSM. Please, just quit doing it, I can't tell you how much we're all just completely fucking fed up with it, as leftists. We're really put off by it. It's really this ridiculous, obnoxious, completely patent deception you're trying to pull off on the ordinary people of this nation, in order to keep them voting for the financial interests of your precious, precious, precious, precious, precious, precious, precious fucking billionaires.
>>546055653>Jehovah … is a full-blooded Nazi … He is this according to seven criteria:>1. He demands racism.>2. He demands ethnic cleansing.>3. He demands ideological irreconcilability.>4. He opposes peace agreements.>5. He despises women deeply and perceives them to be mainly reproductive organs.>6. He adores violence and physical strength.>7. He has a chosen people that he gives a mission to to drive away or conquer all that stand in the way for their supremacy.>This is not a malicious depiction. It can be attested with hundreds of quotations, and it appears throughout the entire spiritual and psychological climate that is present in the Old Testament. For a long time, it has been impossible even to talk about the great inner similarity between Nazism and the Old Testament God.>–Moberg, Eva. 2000a. ‘Du skall inga andra gudar hava jämte mig’ (Thou shall have no other gods before me), Ordfront Magasin 1–2:44–50.
>>546055613Look man, please, I wrote everything I have to write in response to you in the previous posts >>546055562, but also especially this 1 >>546055653.Please, just end your endless false flagging of us, and endless LARPing as us. Please. It's really obnoxious, and we're really very fed up with everything from you mother fuckers.
>>546053280man, ol' bloated blavatsky is probably wishing she would have just said no thanks to the demons before spreading that heretical horseshit
>>546055718I don't approve of billionaires or support capitalism, as the post history proves.
>>546055708Please, just quit LARPing as a leftist, in order to misrepresent us as "Luciferians" or whatever else, because you're all always LARPing to misrepresent us as whatever new unpopular thing. Please, man. Please, just fucking quit the LARPing as us. It's completely fucking obnoxious, and I really don't think anyone wants to put up with it any fucking more.
>>546055784Your politics, as fascists, exist to divert the public attention away from billionaires or capitalism, by manufacturing various culturewars, which you're doing with your "leftists are Luciferians" LARP here, and Jewish scapegoats, which you're also obviously employing. Please, just quit LARPing as us, man. Please, I'm telling you, we're really very fed up with it. And we're absolutely not the "woke, open borders, idpol-obsessed, luciferian misrepresentation" that you're working to build, here.
>>546055815You're not listening or comprehending anything. You're spamming empty replies, like a bot would. I'm going to ignore you now.
>>546055927>>546055784It's also just extremely obvious, what you're doing. Even though you all relentlessly pretend that what you're doing is very convincing, and that you're fooling the world, in fact what you do is very patent. Very transparent.
>>546055708you have zero reading comprehension and even less understanding. are you getting your information from random websites and 5 minute youtube videos? 1. racism - yes, who were the people surrounding biblical israel during that time period.2. yes, this is thoroughly explained why they had to go3. there is only one true God. plenty of demons though4. yes, repeated in the New Testament as well. there can be no covenant between the one true God and Satan. same applies to God's people5. no, when God renamed Abraham He also renamed Sarah. also, Deborah, Book of Judges6. Wrong, King Saul was the first king given as an example that imposing physical presence is not indicative of the qualities which make someone pleasing to God. King David is the other side of that example.7. and why should God do anything different? see number 1. but you are omitting the Phoenicians, the Hivites, some Jebusites, the Persian Empire and some others.In summary, you have no knowledge of what you are talking about and it's best to go read it for yourself and understand it before talking out of your ass. I suspect this isn't the only area where you prove your ignorance.
>>546056643>>546055708God's explicitly opposed to racism, throughout the bible FYI. Your comments to the contrary are based upon the usual misrepresentations, out-of-context quotes, and bankrupt rationalizations. The bible is unequivocally opposed to every one of these misrepresentations which you've posted. But this is how fascists / Luciferians operate, with just blatant misrepresentation of anyone whom they oppose.
>>546052754they might have kept their sick grift going had they just respected people and their nations, in particular white people, now them and their religions must be ended for their scummy treachery and predations.
>>546057262>>546056643>>546055708> Acts 17:26>26 From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.> 1 Samuel 16:7 >7 But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not consider his appearance or his height, for I have rejected him. The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart.”Moses explicitly married and African woman, and when one of the Jewish women in the tribe was upset about it, God literally punished her by turning her stark white into a leper as the punishment. But only for about a week, then he turned her back.Fuck, I could go on. The old testament is rife with commandments to treat immigrants properly. Every accusation which Luciferians made towards The Lord is clearly just completely fictional.
>>546057580>>546057262>>546056643>>546055708Who....who do you think the "Samaritans" were, by the way? From whom the term "Good Samaritan" comes from? Literally they were a hated, and despised, ethnic group which Jesus chose to use as the example of the paradigm of moralist virtue in Luke 10.You people have never read the fucking bible. The claims you all make about religion, in particular on boards like these, are just expressly, overtly false.
>>546057580>>546057262>>546056643>>546055708>>546057751Oh, here's a fucking quote that will drive /pol/ nuts, I just looked this 1 up.You all try to pretend abrahamic religion is jewish ethnosupremacy, or whatever.> Galatians 3:28>28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.Welp. Obviously every 1 of your propagnadistic posts here on /pol/ are just completely bankrupt, Luciferian, fascist garbage.
Revolting, the lies you all tell here, frankly. Whether it's about religion, about leftists, about jews, about yourselves and how you're constantly gaslighting people over your completely bankrupt agenda, which only exists to benefit filthy rich billionaires, or a million other things. The misinformation, and relentless deception posted here is just fucking gross.
>>546057262no, for that time period in question, the israelites were not take up the customs of the people that they would find in the land and surrounding it. much of what happened in the old testament is because some israelites did take up idolatry, did marry and reproduce with the surrounding people, did take up their customs. just look at Solomon. in the New Testament, we see God opens things up to spread the Gospel to the world. that reply is for a conversation regarding the Old Testament and has nothing to do with the new covenant, which is in Jesus Christ. do you suffer from lack of comprehension skills as well? You don't even know the story of Deborah, who was a judge and prophetess, in the Book of Judges, do you?
>>546058106while we are posting Scripture:1 Corinthians 6:9–10Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. Matthew 21:43:"Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."
>>546059153This passage does not factually translate to "effeminate" though. The rest of it just condemns you and your fascist movement, here.>>546058903I don't even know what your point is here, man. Just a bunch of impotent, butthurt, unrelated ranting which has nothing to do with my comments. I posted the facts throughout these comments >>546058018 >>546057751 >>546057580, which you're ignoring. Those comments, obviously, are just the tip of the iceberg, too.Cope. You people here don't even know the basics of the bible, which extremely overtly is anti-capitalist, anti-racist, anti-antisemitism, anti-wealthy and very anti-/pol/.
>>546059805>>546059153These words, they were written in Koine greek, you know, and then translated by people throughout many ages, often for political purposes. For example, I'm surprised you didn't use this translation, but the word which you translated as "abusers of themselves or mankind", was often historically translated as "homosexuals", too. What are the facts on this translation? It's complete bullshit. The word which was being translated was never used, in any historical record, before Paul wrote it here. Therefore, the people who did the translating just made up whatever word fit their own personal political agenda, and put it in there. It's much this way with the word for "effeminate" here, too, which does have various historical translations and meanings, which do not pertain to anyone being "effeminate", LMFAO. And the notion that you want everyone to think God would condemn men to hell, merely for being "effeminate" is pretty fucking laughable.
>>546060268 >>546059805>>546059153I'm just imagining your completely, imaginary, fascist version of God here, who basically would be like Hanz and Franz from the saturday night live sketch, and he's just being like "oh, u going to hell, u little girly man. u going to hell for being a little girly man!"I mean, that's fucking ridiculous. That's obviously not the fact of what God wants. And there's no record of this in the bible, without your requisite dubious translations to make your case.
There is, in fact, no rational argument throughout the entire bible, when viewed in the context of the original hebrew, aramaic or koine, which concludes it's condemnable for anyone to be a practitioner of homosexuality, fortunately.
>>546059805are you offended that being a homosexual is plainly against the Word of God? the word which Paul used is a compound of 2 Greek words: arsēn (male) and koitē (bed, or sexual intercourse). pretty obvious what it means. i'm sure there is a more coarse term that he could have applied but Paul appears to have considered his purpose and audience in choosing his words. • Leviticus 18:22"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."• Leviticus 20:13"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
>>546060797But Leviticus, when read by an actual religious person, who understands it's context, even in the most basic fashion, does not end up interpreted as a book of laws which were meant to apply to the modern world, but rather the result of varying cultural dogmas and traditions which the ancient Israelites were not willing to give up, just yet. Which is why, throughout the bible, as time goes on, The Lord often explicitly contradicts these laws. And furthermore, this is why we don't follow any of the other many provisions which are contained within this book. Eating shellfish, for example, you people don't pretend eating shellfish is sinful, do you? Nope. Didn't think so. Because whenever it comes to any of these other provisions, then magically every fake christian, trying to use the bible to promote their fascist political agenda, recognizes the factual historical context.Now, predictably, when you reply to this comment, you're going to pretend not to understand the religious and historical context of the book of Leviticus, and continue to double down, even though everyone who actually upholds this religion understands the laws within it are undisputably not meant to apply to people in this modern world.
>>546052754
>>546061127>>546060797For another example, apart from the shellfish, in the book of Leviticus there are laws regarding animal sacrifice, which The Lord then later, in multiple different books, like Isaiah, explicitly condemns, and then people eventually quit practicing it.
>>546060488so now we've stacked up about 4 verses which condemn homosexuality. I'm going to tell you something that not everyone understands about the Bible. Scripture will reinforce things more than once. Deuteronomy 19:15 (Old Testament Foundation): "One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established." This principle is applied all over the Bible and here on the subject of homosexuality it is applied as well.
>>546061275>>546061127>>546060797One more thing about the historical and biblical context, which you will probably intentionally pretend not to understand, is that the Lord's relationship with the Israelites in the bible is not 1 of blind obedience, where he tells them what to do, and they just immediately obey. IF you were an actual religious person, and you had actually read the bible, then you would understand this is not the relationship between the ancient Israelites and the Lord, and then you wouldn't have any problem understanding why the book of Leviticus, which governed the political laws of the Israeli people in that time, does not present itself as a book of laws which were intended to be followed in modern times, but rather a mesh of ancient and modern sensibilities which were only intended to be followed in their very explicit historical context.
>>546061326You have not 1 verse which factually condemns homosexuality, in any form of meaningful fashion. Instead, what you're doing is just intentionally ignoring the known-faulty translations which you've provided, or the basic historical contexts of the book of Leviticus, which you deliberately try to evade having to recognize because you know then that it wouldn't even remotely fit your agenda anymore, and you would not be able to use it to misrepresent the views of people who were actually religion, as opposed to your fake fascist pretense of being religious, when you're obviously not.
>>546061326>>546061533>people who were actually religionreligious*, of course. obviously.
>>546052754Christ is Lord.
>>546052754>How to defeat jewsTurn off the screen.
>>546061127"this is why we don't follow any of the other many provisions" - I'm well outside of that 'we' group you have. Jesus quotes from Leviticus in the Gospels. now we have that principle again about witnesses. also, when all those things that God said would not inherit the Kingdom of God...you see the homos mentioned right there. this thing you are trying to do is to bend the Scripture and commandments of God to fit your 'modern world'. However, Matthew 24:35 records Jesus explaining: 35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
>>546061600>>546061533>>546061424>>546061326>>546061275>>546061127>>546060797I also want to note in all of this, that even the Catholic Church, which is a flawed and faulty organization, recognizes that the book of Leviticus is not meant to be followed today, in modern times.Therefore, understand that what I'm writing above is not crackpot internet theory, but, in fact, very much the view of the Catholic Church. And whilst they may make many other mistakes, in terms of the whole cultural discussion around homosexuality and whether or not they view it as sinful, they absolutely recognize that the book of Leviticus is not a book meant to be instructing modern humans to use animal sacrifice, or perpetrate the rape or sex trafficking of underage girls or numerous other things which clearly were part of a historical record of the problems with the traditions and culture of pre and very early Abrahamic Israelite people.You can't write me off, when literally the entire Catholic church backs my point of view, canonically, on Leviticus.
>>546062223In the end, there's not much more to write in response to you, not when every major religious institution in this entire world completely rejects your view of Leviticus being meant to apply in modern times, or in any context out of it's direct historical relationship to the ancient Israelites, and their pre-existing cultures and traditions, prior to adopting Abrahamism >>546062279. The end. Its done. And you're also ignoring all of the other contents and information I've provided for your above, in the previous posts, >>546061533, >>546061424, >>546061275, >>546061127. Because you're not even real religious people on this website. You just try to co-opt and exploit convoluted rationalizations of abrahamic religion, in order to further your fascist political agenda opportunistically, which only involves focusing on these culture wars, mind you, in order to distract the working class public away from focusing on the wars or their many economic problems under your evil policies.
>>546061533i gave you sources for it in the Old and New Testament but you appear to just want to be gay. Here is some practical application for you. Sex outside of marriage is fornication, which is in that list that you just seem to have trouble with. Jesus defines marriage as between one man and one woman. Matthew 19 1-12 is the whole thing but for brevity, here's 4-6:4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
>>546062444>>546062223You are fake religious people here. Just completely fake religious people. You exploit religion as a means to control people, and you LARP as religious in order to deceive people from inside-out into focusing on your precious culture wars, which will distract them from every hold the billionaire class, which you exist exclusively to protect with your antisemitism, responsible.
>>546052754How to defeat Jews, you ask? Legally and safely (in the U.S.)? Look no further than Stochastic Countersemitism. This is only a rough guide, feel free to put your own spin on the technique. And remember, don't carry any gadgets capable of recording or transmitting while conducting Stochastic Countersemitism.
>>546062727
>>546062761
>>546062595I understand the concept of sex outside of marriage being a sin, prior to birth control. Thankfully, we live in the post birth-control world, and no one realistically believes sex outside of marriage is a sin, right now. Unless, per your usual fashion, you want to ignore both the historical and obvious biological reasons why sex outside of marriage would have been viewed as "sinful" in the distant past. None of you believe "sex outside of marriage is sinful", though, nor do actual religious people, as opposed to you completely fake fascist LARPers who have absolutely no real religious views whatsoever when you're not trying to manipulate christians into fascism. You've also moved the goalpost dramatically now, away from the discussion of homosexuality, and on to your completely absurdist notion of trying to tell people they must not conduct any form of sex outside of marriage, I must mention.
>>546062850>>546062595BTW INB4 you just completely ignore the content of my posts again, and then try to divert everyone's attentions away from how disproven your points were, with another completely unrelated topic, or empty goalpost move.
>>546062921>>546062850>>546062595Also, what we're witnessing with the differences between your posts and mine, are the differences between the views of the actual religious people, myself, and the fascist deceivers who relentlessly try to co-opt our religion with vicious misrepresentations, for your own obvious pro-billionaire purposes.
>>546062444your catholic, megachurch, and other 501c3 pastors will not remind you of this but the problem that is repeated over and over in the Bible is when men fall in to following men and not the Word of God. Matthew 7:13–14 is Jesus talking about the wide gate to hell and it's best to stay trying for the narrow gate. the unfortunate truth is most people will go to hell. the Bible will interpret the Bible, not the modern world. Jesus's words are recorded, it's not for anyone else to say anything else. Today, i've quoted several verses of Scripture for you. If i were you, i would not reply back and would go read and study it out. this is an anonymous board, there's no shame in finding out you were wrong on something. but for yourself, sincerely, study it out in the Bible
>>546062850wow...looks like i met James Talarico on /pol/. enjoy what time you have left being a heretic
The whole "I denounce the talmud I denounce the torah" thing is just an exercise in control over whoever you're arguing against. It's exactly like how leftists demand you recite "black lives matter" to prove some sort of standard of decency for yourself. They want you to sit like a good little doggy and recite whatever platitude they give you, they want to control you. And even if you cuck out and say what they want you to say, it's never enough and they'll find some excuse for why you don't meet their purity test.
>>546063042In your posts for the past few responses, you're basically not even responding to the actual points or contents of the posts you're responding to. You're just resorting to off-topic changes of topic, and goalpost moves. And the reason for this is because you can't respond to the actual facts about the bible, and the actual views of actual religious people, which I've presented for you here, and which bare no resemblance to your gross fascist misrepresentations of the way we view everything.Misrepresentations, by the way, which you peddle throughout all of the entertainment industry, which you control, and the media which you control, universities, which you control, and everything else, because you absolutely are the people who control and dominate every facet of this evil western capitalist political establishment.
>>546063129Like I wrote above, the posts between you and me represent the difference between actual religious people (myself), and our views, and your fascist perversions of our views, which you relentlessly peddle in order to further your own fascist agenda, which ultimately only exists to protect the financial interests of fucking billionaires.
>>546053217>I don't know what this means.Ausser Hoff's 3 volume work "Deist Plutarch une Libre" goes into concise depth about what the namefag is referring to. It's not bad for a mid-19th century Austrian work, though much of the second volume can be skimmed.
>>546063863Pseudointellectual, pretentious, elitism, about a thing I'm never going to bother to look into, or read more about. This is all I'm picking up from your post, just FYI. Just "these worthless people on the internet are trying to make themselves appear far more intelligent than they are, per usual, and trying to justify their elitist views against the ordinary working or unfortunately poor people of this nation, per usual!"
>>546063863>>546064100I mean, just tell me whatever fucking point you're trying to make. Don't tell me "hey, here's my prerequisite reading material, which I'm requiring for you to read, in order to understand my vague pointless /pol/ comment, which no doubt it just intended to rationalize my fascist, Luciferian, perverted, unwarranted feelings of elitism over everyone else."
Whatever. Probably time for me to fucking log off right now.
