Do you think in the future we will have technology so everyone’s kids grow up looking like this being super healthy and smart? eugenics has a bad rap but I think enough time has passed since WW2 that people are coming around to the idea that maybe we should try and make sure the next generation doesnt have so many health and mental problems and won’t associate it pointlessly with “the bad guys in history”
It's all personal preference. Yeah there are attractive traits, I think cavill blows pattinson out of the water. I've seen people point to one woman as a 10/10 and I think she's like a 5.
>>546084412the golden ratio has nothing to do with faces thothis is a stupid misuse for clicks
DNA is just the blueprint. You have to also ensure ideal fetal development, ideal chewing habits and nutrition and dental care etc. to make sure the kid grows up to fullfil his potential instead of becoming a mongoloid with an overbite. >>546084476intersubjective consensus. nobody's going to say Cavill or Pattinson is a 0 and Brian peppers is a 10.
>>546084580I fully agree with what youre saying, I find it strange that today we don’t have more knowledge on general wellness and optimal development and that we don’t have institutional backing and structure to make sure the population is informed and applies this. We micromanage so many other aspects of our citizens lives that it would at least make sense to do it with things that are completely positive and increase the probability of the individualnhaving a successful future. I also think healthy lunches in school should be totally revamped to support this as well as a one off example.
I am not as attractive as either of them and have more children, as well as dating a much younger woman than either of themThe actual filter is being uncucked and extroverted, a bit predator-ish. Looksmax for yourself if you want to but you wont get magical outcomes from it. Past the initial meeting of a guy women almost fully focus on internal traits. If you engage irl outside the online shit you already beat most filters. It is the same with this bodybuilding shit. External solutions for internal problems. Most men look "good enough" as it is. However, they are weak-willed, easily shamed, docile and depend of the opinion of the woman. Especially the modern corporate slaverat. The issue is I can tell this to people, it has no use. Most men are literally drones and the moment a society stops churning out marriagable woman as well as heavily supporting family-creation + shunning divorce, basically most men turn into embarrassing pussy beggar ghouls. The extreme end of this is the love of some women for criminals but the core desire for a man who needs them less than the reverse is applying to basically any woman. It is one thing to recognize this and another in the heat of the moment not to turn into a simp. Most men fail this because historically speaking being a simp to the system was the best survival strategy
>>546084476I mean anomalies can be put down to personal preference. But most people would agree. For example Robert Pattinson is an unremarkable guy, he's not particularly attractive. Most people would agree. The odd fetishfag would not. Most people agree niggers are not attractive, but the odd one out will.
>>546084412no fucking way pattinson is ever gonna beat superman.
You guys are missing the point of the thread - and to acknowledge what youre arguing over, it doesnt matter if looks are subjective…like that guy said no one would say those people are a 0/10 and it would be good if everyone was born in a way that at least made them a 6/10 or 7/10 no matter what at the bare minimum.I can take it further and say if you grow up with confidence then in your formative years and early adult years you can devote more mental energy to your goals instead of being insecure or feeling like you don’t fit in because you are a 3/10 or 4/10. So you get a more productive platform from the get go to operate from.
Has no one here made the conclusion that if you had a smarter healthier population that they probably would lead to a society and that functions better and is more pleasant to be in? That is as political as you can get. No input at all for this thread and just bullshit topics? Who do you want your surgeon to be? Who do you want your judge to be or the city planner to be? Who do you want designing your systems that keep your society functioning? And the people who operate all of the machinery why are the cogs in the machine you interact with on a daily basis could be just as pleasant and competent to be around.
>>546084793superman is a homo
dude is weirdhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieZHOh6Zjps
>>546087166idk about that but if it's true pretty sure it's because of hollywood
