A number of women? Stinking /pol/ tried to convince me that it was only one.https://youtu.be/jcNgkn4FvDM?t=31
>>546087627>implying one isn't a numberWomen lie, anon. All they know is lie and eat hot chip.
>>546087627Consent can be retracted decades later. Any woman you've ever slept with can decide it was rape if you make her angry.
>>546087771Why are atheists such liars? In both the United Kingdom and the United States, a person cannot retroactively withdraw consent to sexual activity that was genuinely consensual at the time.
He was convicted despite there being ZERO evidence (if you don't count all the evidence that the case was judged on). Just because he was a devout Christian (for about five minutes), it makes you sick how crooked the courts are!
>>546087658They learned it from somewhere. Men aren't any better. You're a liar if you say so. Look at this board. It's all lies.
The world is a stage.
>>546088582The Cosmos is the stage. Soon you'll know.
>>546088245Women can simultaneously consent and not-consent to sex until the consent is measured by an observer. If you want to avoid the trouble of retroactive consensual causality, Get a Dave Chappelle trademarked Love Contract.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl_TL9gQyXE
>>546087627What are their names? Real people have names.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxFU_fIUawM
