[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sbLdqTiyVg3pKMhH-muted.mp4 (554 KB, 478x270)
554 KB
554 KB MP4
Nov 2026 Hormuz shipping costs remain extreme: war-risk insurance 6-10% of hull value per transit ($6-20M for a VLCC vs $250k pre-war, up to 40x).

Recent Nov 2026 Hormuz data (Partner-SHIP/UKMTO/Windward) describes 28 incidents/28 vessels in prior 30 days (7 in last 7 days). Totals: 177 vessels, 151 incidents, 7 sunk, 26 killed. Recent: VLCC Fujairah Energy hit (4 injured, 10 Nov); unnamed tanker projectile hit NE of Lima; tug Selat Storm partially sinking (projectile), tanker fires/mines claimed by IRGC. UKMTO admitted that most attacks and ships destruction is _not_ reported, so real number of destroyed/damaged vessels is _much higher_ than the reported one due to dark sailings and electronic warfare/AIS spoofing.

Trackers (Kpler, AIS/satellite) show Hormuz clearance 5-8 mb/d (or lower detected outbound 0.6-1.3 mb/d recently) vs pre-war 17-20 mb/d. US claims of near-full/"90%" recovery conflict with these. Dark sailings and definitions create gaps, but flows remain well below normal.

Reserves crisis deepens: US SPR 279.5 mb (Nov 6; lowest since 1982), projected to 240 mb low. Global: 1B barrels drawn since crisis start. Diesel at multi-decade seasonal lows in places. ADNOC/Aramco note depleted buffers, limited shock absorption.

>Iran's IRGC Navy claimed the tankers used an unauthorized route, backed by U.S. jets, with footage showing smoke plumes and one vessel capsizing. These incidents follow October's record 37 ship attacks in the region, heightening shipping risks through this key energy chokepoint. Poland's Orlen became the first to cancel a long-term LNG contract with QatarEnergy, citing force majeure from disruptions; the deal covered 1 million tonnes yearly until 2034.

https://x.com/i/trending/2120422708681068644

First Saudi supplies to Bolanda were cancelled, now Qatars too. Kewl xD

Vid-rel: another two supertankers hit by IRGC tonight.
>>
File: 1794400282563922.mp4 (2.72 MB, 854x480)
2.72 MB
2.72 MB MP4
Juicy hit from yesterday
>>
File: 1794398533619690.mp4 (478 KB, 474x854)
478 KB
478 KB MP4
Emirati vessel sank in the Strait of Hormuz after violating passage rules. Vid from yesterday.
>>
Nov 10 : 3 hit oil tankers
>>
File: NvolrVeLSOezOBme-muted.mp4 (543 KB, 478x270)
543 KB
543 KB MP4
>>546089856
And thats the third one
>>
>>546089137
What ever happened to iran's drone carrier? Why can't they use those to project power further out to sea?
>>
>>546089922
IRIS Shahid Bagheri was a standard container ship modified for drones. It was sunk by US forces in early March during the Epstein Fury.

Besides Iran cannot usefully project power farther out to sea with these civilian ships because they are large, slow, lightly defended, and easy to find and kill once they leave the clutter of coastal waters. Concentrating drones on one high-value hull turns them into a convenient target rather than a survivable force.

The biggest and permanent Iranian success is pushing US Navy outside of the range of its anti-ship missiles. The most recent US Navy posture (November 2026) shows carriers operating in the Arabian Sea, deliberately outside the densest Iranian anti-ship missile (cruise and ballistic) threat envelope. This alone proves that they succeeded.
>>
>>546089519
>"Safety First" emblazoned on the ship in massive red letters
>Forcing jeets to sail through a literal war zone where they are stated targets of both sides
lmao
>>
>>546090395
How is it success when irgc is still getting bombed on the daily? Are carriers supposed to park right off the shore of the country they're operating against?
>>
>>546090843
>irgc is still getting bombed on the daily

It is not tho, LMAO. USrael is not an industrial powerhouse like Russia, it cant afford a sustained daily firepower even for months, not to mention years. Your domain are services, software and banking, while big chunk of physical production is rebranding Chinese stuff xD
>>
>>546091257
Ignoring reality is not a viable tactic if you wish to argue in good faith. Go to /pig/ with your retard takes, you'll enjoy the echo chamber. Plus half of them are russian, so you'd be in good company.
>>
>>546091384
You are just being a troll, dude. High intensity Epatein Fury ended with a critical depletion of stockpiles and if some cosmetic and low power strikes happen now, it is usually once a month and Iran answers with much bigger firepower. Get real xD
>>
File: favjfBqjLkKtWdpo-muted.mp4 (756 KB, 720x768)
756 KB
756 KB MP4
Footage of a ship being targeted and catching fire in the Strait of Hormuz yesterday.
>>
z
>>
>>546089137
Based
>>
>Iran is striking ships daily with impunity and the US cant do shit about it

So funny how much this war has exposed the "world's superpower"



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.