[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: american southwest.jpg (497 KB, 1586x2047)
497 KB JPG
>>
Because direct administration was carried out by Mexico City in New Spain, and the settlers were from New Spain, not necessarily spanish. This was because Madrid was practically even farther away, Mexico City already had experience administering the Philippines, and it was necessary for the leather clad soldiers and colonists to come from Northern Mexico since they already had experience with the harsh geography and conditions of the Septentrion.
Although the California coast began to gain greater direct recognition from the 18th century onward, before then it was merely a map claim. New Mexico, on the other hand, was already better integrated into Central Mexico through the Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
>>
>>546097117
So I see that you have words to justify stealing ownership from the natives. By this same logic, native lands in the United States belong to the United States.
>>
>>546097385
Yeah, I don't mind, I just want it to be understood that the historical situation was exactly as it was, because if such a remote territory is considered spanish and not mexican even though the administration and resources came from Mexico in the 18th century, then any territory of the Spanish empire was as spanish as peninsular Spain itself.
>>
a lot of places on the coast, the valuable places, have NGOs/503c's of tribal people who claim it is their land because some guy danced there in the 1800s
>>
File: 17658412551240.png (654 KB, 1024x682)
654 KB PNG
> pic
looks like it's Russian for me
>>
>>546096210
that region is majority mexican, so yes, it belongs to mexico
>>
>>546098167
But that's recent.

We're talking about the 18th century, where until the beginning of the 19th century, the only areas that had been successfully populated were the California coast and the interior of New Mexico.
>>
>>546096210
I don't care who owns it. Just make it a nice zone to fuck strange women, no cops, no christian caliphates, just sexo at a fair price
>>
>>546096210
Who the fuck do you think the Mexicans are? They're the direct descendants of the indigenous tribes and the Spanish.
>>
File: 1794262802424215.jpg (72 KB, 899x1197)
72 KB JPG
>>546096210
xD
>>
>>546097117
Is it true the Mexican government invited Anglo Chads into the border territories to protect them from the Comanches?
>>
>>546098790
So Canada belongs to the descendants of the Indians, the French and the English who settled it and established it as a country, right?
>>
>>546102636
no it belongs to Indian chadjeets
>>
>>546096210
Land belongs to who can control it. That's it. That's all that matters. No global laws or philosophies matter when all that determines land ownership is proof of force.
>>
>>546096210
wtf are you babbling about

Mexicans are the indigenous tribes

Do you think they come from europe lmao?
>>
>>546097385
Stealing what from the natives? 4 mudhuts?
I didn't know stealing was giving away an entire nation with culture, language, gastronomy and etc lmao
You browns are crazy and deserve judgement
>>
>>546102293
I've heard Texas was mostly inhabited by anglos when it was part of Mexico. Don't know about the western states.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.