Incels have yet to make a coherent argument against this.
>>546158576>jew flagGo fuck your whore mother, kike rat.The faggot shitskin mods promote this garbage. Go die, mods. Fucking faggots.
>>546158576the average IQ in western countries began falling exactly one generation after women gained the right to own property and became the primary decision-makers in their romantic lives (ie, boomer generation).
>>546158576all women would flock to the top 1% warlords and violent men their offspsring would be violent men everyone would be worse off trying to build civilization under those conditionsthat is why patriarchy was good
>>546158635>fails to make a coherent argumentSigh...
>>546158576By breeding more niggers?
>>546158778Except we're living better than ever?
>>546158576By selecting for chemical reliant bootlicking freaks that die at age 40?
>>546158823>Except we're living better than ever?it took time to build civilization under patriarchyit will take time to destroy it by returning to monke for now, women are happy in the long term, everyone will suffer
>>546158576Shes still ugly and shouldnt breed though
>>546158576That's all fine and dandy but we shouldn't have to pay for womens retirement, they take out of the system more than they put in.
>>546158576Do you actually want a retort to this? Or are you just rage-baiting?Women never lead evolution. Men have. Species like Elephant seals, cuttlefish, etc have the females "choose" the strongest males to sire young with. Yet funnily enough, the "losers" manage to still pass on their genes. You could be a total Chad, and a woman will still breed with a "loser" if they like the idea of it.As for humans, men are naturally stronger. Stronger men were good before agriculture. Did women choose the stronger men? No, the men chose which men stayed in the tribe and bred the women.After agriculture strength was beginning to wane as a desirable trait. Being able to kill a boar was impressive, but being able to buy the boar without exerting the energy was better. Since this point, women looked up to the highest value men. Do you know who got to breed? The men, again. They had the final say. Sure women could "choose" a partner, but at the end of the day, they were at the mercy of a man's choice, not their own."Feminism solved the patriarchy issue." Only if you assume all of human civilization just magics itself into existence. That every single piece of medicine, tech, culture, law, and mindset weren't cultivated by men who had the investment of their chosen woman at heart. I assume this is still rage-bait. But I think it's really retarded to assume women ever had any "power" or "choice" that was held down by "patriarchy." As if they didn't also have a desire to invest in producing children that would benefit them in the future? They didn't have daddy state to guarantee them financial security and labour in the woman's old age.
>>546158576This clearly isn’t true though, women now only want 1% of high T men who are Chad and have psychopathic tendencies and refuse to be shaped by liberal feminist programming. The guys are at home playing videogames and watching pornhub
>>546158576So all women are peak genetic material while only 10% of men are acceptable?If you care about genetics and all than admit that only the top 10% of women should reproduce too.
>>546158576Fuck women's rights, let's talk about women's wrongs
>>546158576patriarchy = wimen version of dajoos
I don't care about women, and I don't care about normalfag milestones like mating or whatever.
>>546160195can't argue with that!>>546160270my man
>>546160085>Women never lead evolution. Men have.That's not how evolution works. Female mate choice is a major mechanism of sexual selection. Male competition and female choice can operate simultaneously. >The 'losers' manage to still pass on their genes.Sexual selection doesn't require unsuccessful males to never reproduce. It requires differences in reproductive success. Alternative mating strategies don't disprove female preference. Your cuttlefish example actually demonstrates this.>The men chose which men stayed in the tribe and bred the women.You're presenting speculation about prehistoric societies as established fact. Male physical strength doesn't establish universal male control over reproduction. Human mating systems varied, and female preferences influenced reproductive outcomes.>Women could 'choose' a partnerYou've practically conceded my argument. If women had preferences but lacked the autonomy to act on them, patriarchal institutions constrained female mate choice. Mutual consent isn't equivalent to institutional restrictions on women's choices.>Every single piece of medicine, tech, culture, law, etc. were cultivated by men.Men historically dominating institutions doesn't establish women's lack of ability or justify their exclusion. You're confusing monopolizing opportunities with possessing exclusive capabilities.>They didn't have daddy state to guarantee them financial security.Exactly. Economic dependence made women's reproductive choices contingent on male provision rather than independent preference. You're describing another mechanism through which patriarchy restricted female choice.Ultimately, you're confusing men's historical control over reproductive opportunities with women's evolutionary influence. The distinction between whom women would independently choose and whom social institutions allowed them to choose is precisely my argument.
She's coping. There are tons of men with subpar genes that can just buy a bloodline. Once mire subpar men with genes star waking up to being single father surrogates then foids won't have anything left. Once foids see some subhuman walking his kid in a stoller expect suicides from foids.
>>546158576She makes patriarchy sound even more based.
>>546158576Women aren't correcting jackshit, they're just making their race die out
>>546158576>what do you want most in this world little girl>I want to get married and have a huge family >okay, well, that's what we've been doing since before religion, makes sense>what do you want modern women >I dont want to get married I want a job and to prolong marriage, as few kids as possible so I can have more parties, and anything that tells me otherwise is the devil >what>yes you wanting that for me is oppression>what >yes I am suffering greatly every day just existing and this is proof of your will over me and not my own choices *internalizes what she just said* I'm going to my therapist tomorrow to get my tranquilizers increased
>>546158576But those systems also allow women that look like her to not be lonely in old age. Maybe she wants chads kids and then for the state to raise them. Then those kids will keep her company in old age?
>we end up with 7'9 lankets with 10 inch dicks and an IQ of 50
>>546158576that's a lot of make up the topic at hand
>>546158576Look up love the brotherhood.
>>546160712makeupcels are cooked/thread
>>546158576Ah yes, "evolution" and "natural selection" with stringently enforced rape laws. Just as nature intended.
>>546160709>we end up with 7'9 lankets with 10 inch dicks and an IQ of 50Move to East Asia>we end up with 5'5" manlets with 4 inch dicks and an IQ of 200
>>546158576I'm tired of opinionated couch experts making up dumb theories with false causes and explanations and idiots falling for it. We need to take social media away from certain people.
>>546158576I really hope the beta uprisings and incel riots will be bloody.
>>546161084These guys always find the worst examples and somehow invert them to make them worse. Like finding an article that most people arent actually in a committed relationship and spamming it's specifically people on this board's fault. Very feminine behavior
>>546158576How does Christianity fulfill any of these claims?
>>546161350Source: i made it upWelcome to feminism
>>546158576Dropping a big trvke, qveen. Incels and genetic deadends are not entitled to breed. And they’ll be spending the next couple of decades coping about it before realizing it’s too late. No amount of monogamy cope excuses is going to save you fags this time. Now we can finally have a proper darwin selection in the upcoming future. Women can finally decide what’s the best for society. Genetic deadbeat men’s opinions don’t really matter anymore, especially behind a screen.>>546160709So be it. Somehow the heights keep getting taller, so why not?>>546161084We’re tired of monkeys chiming in worthless posts like yours yet we still can’t always get what we want sometimes
>>546160537This. Her entire argument goes out the window when money is involved
>>546161468Women propelled themselves into this position believing they'd be able to figure out something in the meantime. Well it has been a couple centuries now and theyre still just blaming everyone but themselves
>>546158576>we would literally rather dieOk, spokesperson of women, when are Afghani women going to start mass killing themselves when they have as many rights as pet goats under the Taliban?
>>546158576The world was better when women were kept in cages.
>>546160414How is modern egalitarian society any more 'natural' than patriarchal society?Also you have failed to show that women's preferences are actually eugenic
>>546162217They dont knkw anything. Feminism is based on the presupposition it's correct. But none of them actually have the capacity to prove it. A lot of their intellectuals are the equivalent of gossiping gnostics. >what if we remove the oil pump from this engine, look it was never needed it still runs *high fives* the oik pump is a lie
>>546158576>Women are correcting the human evolution process>By having 50 sexual partners, but no childrenlmao
>>546158576That chick is a fucking loserGo back to whatever pseudoscience bullshit classes you went to and stay there so you don’t burden the rest of society
>>546158576
>>546160414In nature the males just typically rape the females and the consequences are negligible so this is just how its done. Sorry, but if we return to nature you are asking for a return to rape and gneoicide of the line of male heirs when a new male deposes the previous alpha.Or when war comes and the previous males are slaughtered or driven off and bing bang boom women better accept what they got or else they're slaves.So, yes, all that mealy mouthed bullshit about women choosing is in fact more propaganda and didn't happen. Sorry you like to believe in a revised history and further revise it when your revisisons turn out to be bullshit.
do women understand that natural selection includes… RAPE
>>546158576>didn't watch>don't careI'm just waiting until its legal to beat feminists & simps out in the streets.
>>546158576Her face is sub-par genetics, disgusting.
>>546158576wait, isn't boss-monkey-mate-with-multiple-females the epitome of patriarchy?
>>546161548Her whole take is dumb and shows she hasn't thought about it for 15 seconds. When has religion in the west forced women into marriages? Is this video addressed to the Taliban?
>>546158576> women fails at Evolution because she lets her eggs dry up waiting for Chad> It's actually stunning and brave because this somehow owns the ChudsMake it make sence.
>>546163837They're entirely materialistic. Theyre basically holding a gun to their own head and saying youre the one holding it.
>>546163905They are retards, we need to end the pension system before Millenial cuntoids reach it. I want to see old ugly hags starving.
>>546158576The fix is going backwards. Repeal women's suffrage. Women should no longer be citizens. Women should be property of their fathers until he is approached by an acceptable suitor for them to hand off her ownership to.
>>546163905what you just described is a jew.
>>546158576I actually can.What she is talking about selection by natural means.However MODERN society is not driven by true natural selection.but why?A police force exists to dissuade me from just forcing myself on a woman at will. The threat of jail and loss of freedom of movement is the dissuading force.Her Hypergamy is dependent on an external fabricated system of enforcement.
>>546158576FOIDSLOP THREAD
>>546158576She should sterilize herself in order to help correct human evolution. Very dysgenic looking/behaving.
>>54615877880% of women and men are NPCs.80% of women and men will go along with evil when instructed by authority.This is not a woman problem. It's an ultra domesticated sheeple NPC Dunning-Kruger problem.
>>546158576>muh suffrageWhat have women done with their suffrage other than use it to try disenfranchising men and filling their nations with foreigners to cope with their own mundane wage slaving lives?
>>546160085Females influence evolutionary change.Many mammals can self-abort/induce miscarriage. Others know which plants to ingest so that miscarriage can be induced.Female humans cheat on their dysgenic partners all the time.It's not exclusive to males.
Men come from conquerors. Women came from whores who opened their legs to conquerors.
She's not entirely wrong.But she's still wrong on plenty of levels.Yes, many men would not reproduce without 'muh patriarchy' religions. However, gene superiority is also a semi-lottery, even from genetically superior men - children from all classes pre-industrial revolution had a mortality rate close to 40% and those who survived because they likely had a better immune system also had many additional genetic advantages (health, height, IQ etc.).What she completely misses is the fact that she would be a wench, 1 in a number of woman to an elite man and she would get slapped around physically for speaking out against him and probably often raped.In that world she wants, there's no welfare from the government because there would be no working class average males paying their taxes because they would be roaming bands of thugs instead. And she'd probably get raped by one of those gangs at some stage.She also complains about violence, and doesn't have any clue of the amount for violence in the world she describes.She can't have the world she claims to want unless she's willing for about half the children she would birth to die (weeding out inferiors), she'd also have to be willing to subject herself to a man completely without daddy government and she'd need to deal with far worse living conditions (less tradesmen and worse technology) and deal with far more violence.Many men who are in the top 20% would be perfectly happy in these conditions.I guarantee you, she wouldn't be. Because women can never be happy, no matter what.
>>546158576No mention of Islam. The one faith that actually oppresses women. Curious.
>>546158576What is to argue about? Let them do their selective culling. Or whatever they call it. I wouldn't want to live in that world nor have kids born into it. This form of thinking is jewish. Women who adhere to it are by extension also jewish. So it will be filled with empty promises of grandeur and disease. They will all die off and any actual humans left will repopulate the planet. If not, who cares. Hitler and Goebbels are and gone. What is the point of living anymore?
>>546164428Kek "whipped em too hard" problem
>>546158823Now I know for sure you're a fucking kikeWhat is wrong with your brains to think this is living better?You really are the ferment of decomposition. Your ugly fucking people only know how to destroy.
>>546166403>Let them do their selective culling.Also eliminate any social programs that allow Chad/Tyrone's 80 IQ offspring survive, so we can do natural selection but for real
>>546158576Retarded take. Imagine thinking nrarly universal cultural traditions were "set up". These systems were not "set up" so that subpar men could breed. They organically came to dominate because women consider 80% of men subpar and if your tribe fails to give 80% of men something worth working and dying for, your tribe will get dominated and raped by tribes that will. Where are all the successful feminist civilizations? Fucking dead.
>>546158576Sounds like a whole lotta not my problem.
>>546158778Women don't flock to warlords. Warlords just show up, kill the guys, and just keep the women as sex slaves. That's why her whole premise is wrong. Women didn't historically choose their partners in tougher times. They either shacked up with a man that would protect her or they were taken and raped. Women don't inherently get a choice because they don't have the strength to impose their will. The modern system she is complaining about is the only time where they've been given agency by men playing along.
>>546158792>accept my subversionNo>accept my framing of youNoShow flag glownigger
>>546166742I'm in for that
>>546158576This is so stupid it has to be bait. But idk. It's a woman.
