Is /pol/ smart enough to solve this?
48cm
>>546158956my penis size is exactly this size. no white woman disappoint yet
According to these measurements, i fucked your mom
>>5461589564 times around a 4cm circumference is 16cm.the length of the rod is irrelevant data.
>>546158956Jews
>>546159175x8 cause it loops in the back32cm
>>546158956It's numbers many. That's how many numbers it is.
>>546158956>>546159304>manyThis. It's more than can be counted so the correct answer is many
>>54615895620cmI'm White and didn't use a calculator. I did it in my head.
>>546159143A german would never be this funny, unless what he speaks is the truth.
>>546159175Good approximation but it's going to be slightly shorter since the "circles" are interconnected. So you are double counting the crossover section.
>>546158956It 28cm
>>546158956Lol its any number, but ill choose 20.
>>546158956Easy, I take the string off and measure that
>>546158956it just matters how you use it
Youre finding the arc length of a sin wave here.Im not doing the math but thats the answer
>>5461589568pi+12cm
>>5461593661. Split the cylinder into 4 cylinders that are 3cm tall.2. Unfurl each cylinder into a 3cm x 4cm rectangle.5. The string is the hypotenuse of each rectangle. 6. In a 3x4 rectangle, the hypotenuse is 5.7. Each segment of string a has a length of 5cm, there are 4 segments, therefore the total string length is 20cm.
Thnks @grok.
>>546158956No.
>>546158956It's 20 cm
>>546159184Lol, Jews fake being smart with their retarded Bible number astrology.
Isn't it just 20cm becuase a cylinder is just a rectangle wapped, and if it goes around it's from top left to bottom right corner its just multiple rectangles (4)? So it's a triangle with pyth hyp of a 3x4 rect is 5cm. Idk I usually just build bridges and shit, Idk if this is right
Have you guys never heard of Pythagoras?sqrt((4*4 cm)^2 + (12 cm)^2) = 20 cm
>>546159582My school didnt taught the cylinder rectangle correlation; i found that out on my own as usual. I felt like going to school was a waste in some respects.
Do your own homework faggot
>>546159518>>546159551>>546159531We actually live in a non-Euclidian space-time so it's not going to be precisely 20cm. You have to take the minute curvature of spacetime into account to get the actual answer.
>>546159531based
>>546159531damn, my quick guesstimate was "around 20cm", I'm a genious
>>546159663Why does it matter where we live, since this is algebra?
I unwrap the string and put it next to a ruler
>>546159175what if it was 1 cm circumference and the length of the rod was 1000000 cm. Would the length of the rod still be irrelevant data?
>>546158956bout tree fiddy
>>54615895620cm?my thinking was 4cm of string per wrap with 4 wraps, then the length is 12cm / 4 for 3cm shift per wrap, then 4^2 + 3^2 sqrt = 5 and 5*4 = 20
>>546159346You've got a triangle, 4 of them.Circumference of 4cm is the base.One wrap around covers 12/4cm=3cm.Unravel it, it's a 3-4-5 right triangle.So the hypotenuse is 5cm.There's 4 wraps, 4x5=20cm.The string is 20cm long.>>546159175Dumb.
This thread was moved to >>>/bant/25324836
