[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1794564969174.jpg (221 KB, 1080x1440)
221 KB JPG
Why do betting markets say that the Dems will nominate Ossoff when Newsom is just as likely to be the candidate for presidency when you consider the statistical probabilities within politics? Or idk maybe even AOC.
>>
>>546159095
God I wish it were me
>>
>>546159624
i found a website where i can get a wire retainer bc fake braces actually kind of suck ime
>>
>>546160629
Ummm ... okay.
>>
Newsom's brand is cancer. Ossoff can play middle American moderate better. Doesn't matter, if Harris runs she wins the black vote and that dictates the primary winner for Dems.
>>
>>546161148
Not bad anon, Ossoff is very busy working the black vote, apparently his voting record is pretty bleak for far left.
>>
>>546159095
that better be a boy



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.