>when Republicans pick a guy, it's a literally who>0 input from figureheads like Alex Jones or whoever the fuck>the person is a Trojan horse anyway, like all of their SCOTUS picks>when Democrats pick someone it's being discussed by all the media personalities, like Breaking Points and even smaller influencesSo Republicans are just openly a shadow party that tells lies.
So your criterion for whether a political appointment is good or not is whether e-celebs are talking about them
>>546191882You lost miggerkike, kys
Pisses me off that Trojans get the rap for the entire concept of sneaky lowdown shit human tier betrayals of trust and hospitality and etc. There havent trojans for a millennia! It's time for /pol/ to brainstorm a new, more zionist oriented name for it.
>>546191977I accept your concession
>>546191502The Republican Party exists as a controller opposition party. The democrats have always been from their founding the party of the Illuminati and the republicans are the false opposition.
>>546192462Controlled***
>>546191502The Republicans aren't controlled opposition; they just seethed so hard through Clinton they became retarded.
>>546191993Trojans were the ones who fell for it retard
>>546192681Kek
>>546191502It's more that Republicans are less fussy, likely a result of conservative mindset.They vote for their party, and if they win then they step back and start ignoring politics. Dems however tend to be fussier, and always have an opinion on what their party is doing. One of the major reasons most Dem voters still hate the democratic party.
>>546193177"Less fussy" = blind trust in a reality TV conman they've never met irl
>>546192681That makes it even less fair though?
