Americans mutilate their sons genitals jew style.
Child genital mutilation
Ritual infant penis mutilation.
Ban male genital mutilation = kill judaism
Ritual baby penis mutilation and baby penis blood sucking. All jewish.
Americans mutilate their boys and then pretend it isn't a big deal. They're all subhuman trash for ever tolerating this shit.
How do we solve the christcuck problem so little boys wont have their penises cut off as jehovah the foreskin demon commanded?
Circumcision rates collapse in states where Medicaid stops covering it. Dollars are the only unit of value the normie American mind understands.
Crimes against humanity
As perfected,a piece of propaganda as the holocaust...Convince every family that a strange cringe, creepy Jewish man can come and slice up the penis of your child, you're newborn, your baby boy and then suck the blood from the wound, he's inflicted, and then you pay him.
Reparations are inevitable
Write the bill new representative. Write a bill banning circumcision. Get a coalition and call up the press.
They won't because they'll have to fight the Jew and Muslim lobbies and their (((faith based partners))) fake christcuck pastors.
>>546198556intactivists should really focus on this rather than try and feebly attempt toconvince new american parents circumcision is not necessary. lobby state politicians and convince them they're paying for an unnecessary, cosmetic procedure for all newborn males, get them to drop it as something state medicade covers, and private insurance will shortly follow since they don't want to pay for something the state recognizes as cosmetic and unnecessary. it's amazing how many parents will suddenly stop doing it and see it as unnecessary if it means they have to pay for it themselves out of pocket, no matter how much they been brainwashed to think kosher/halal cock looks better and is cleaner
Word of the day is "accountability".
>>546198848We're going to need the help of our no faith partners to make this a win a for our King, who, by making a new covenant in his blood, eliminated the necessity of penis mutiliation.
>>546197896Stop posting these threads. Nobody cares
>>546199017Abrahamic religions worship the act inherently. You cannot divorce Jesus from the covenant act, that's where his theological legitimacy comes from. Fuck the abrahamic god and all who worship it.
>>546199165Kill yourself faggot
>>546199017what's really frustrating is that white conservative christians are the most likely to do it, and liberal atheists are more likely to second guess it and prevent it from happening. it's like they want to be jewish so bad, except for the whole denying Jesus is the Messiah thing
>>546199220Circumcision in America isn't done for religious reasons most of the time. Tons of atheists have their kids cut.
>>546199204You have no foreskin poor you
>>546198848
>>546199165>t. circumcised canuckYou will never be an American
>>546199174Or you could just focus on the issue of penis mutilation and know you have a religious ally that will dispute it on religious grounds when you're accused of being just anti-religion.
>>546199284I'm sure there are, but my point is, somebody who is progressive and non-religious is more likely to question the practice, meanwhile white christians do it unquestionably because they are gullible and want their son to look just like their dad penis wise
>>546197896
>>546199328>penis mutilationIt's not mutilation its literally just cutting off a useless piece of skin. Thats like saying getting your tonsils or appendix removed is mutilation
>>546199491It is objectively mutilation of functional and sensitive tissue from a child. You're a fucking retard if you think anons are buying this shit in current year.
>>546199491Disgusting fucking kike.
>>546199328>Or you could just focus on the issue of penis mutilationYeah the covenant act of the abrahamic religions. Fucking useful retard.
>>546199409>meanwhile white christians do it unquestionablyYeah, it's unfortunately true that it's progressives more willing to take it up and there's some shabbos pastor the Jews can always put out there to stand up for a practice the Apostles discontinued in the name of religious freedom. That lying sack of shit will get his congregation out there to protest any discussion about criticizing the practice. The early church had Judaizers and the late church does, too.
>>546199618It literally serves no purpose other than making your penis look like an ant eater. How would ypu even know having a foreskin is better if you don't have one?
>>546199491You're not going to discourage me from the words of Paul.
>>546199438It's crazy how well he played that character. He's a completely normal dude IRL.
>>546199740I have my foreskin. It's based. It provides protection of the glans, comes with built in gliding mechanism, and the best part is that my parents didn't have me painfully violated over jewish lies.
>>546197896That woman is evil. The man made a mistake. We all do some dick thinking and pay the price for it, but little kids shouldn't pay the price for our mistakes.I sometimes envy homos. I wish I could dislike pussy. These bitches are retarded.
Judaism is an anti-foreskin cult. This needs to be stated openly as they admit it themselves. They are anti-foreskin by doctrine, thus they are anti-intact man by doctrine as well. This is an act of war against the default, intact, UNMUTILATED baseline of humanity.
>>546199833So then how do you know not having a foreskin sucks? Most people who are cut are not seething anf screeching all kinds of antisemetic bullshit. Muslims are circumsized and muslims tend to be antisemetic yet they still choose to circumsize their babies
>>546197896Parents that allow this to happen to their kids are scumbags
>>546200083Shut the fuck up kike. Kill all child genital mutilators and their enablers.
>>546199882You're like smeagal from lord of the rings crying about muh precious foreskins. Nobody cares. If getting circumsized was so bad and Jews were actually evil (they're not) they would not get themselves circumsized while pushing circumcision on non Jews yet Jews themselves get circumsized
>>546200152So kill a bunch of normal people. Got it.
>>546200173Kill yourself you filthy fucking kike.
Daily reminder that it is this simple. Foreskin is functional, sensitive tissue. Cutting it off is an act of genital mutilation. Female genital mutilation is outlawed with NO EXCEPTION for any religious ritual shedding of blood. Since we are equal under law, that protection for girls from RITUAL MUTILATION of their genitals automatically applies to boys. Thus, brit milah is ALREADY AN ILLEGAL ACT.Foreskin is absolutely functional and sensitive tissue. Not "extra skin", and not redundant.The act of male genital mutilation is horrifically traumatizing and painful. For what? An objectively dysfunctional penis is the end result for the boy.The double standard is intentionally upheld by the establishment, making the continuation of the act a legitimate structural sacrifice FROM the population to preserve the authority and power of the institutions that propagate this evil.Checkmate. Go fuck yourself.
>>546200226I feel like I know that quote from somewhere but you swapped it out with Judaism because you're an antisemitic piece of garbage.
>>546200307>waah ur antisemiticYes. Keep saying it. That word has NEGATIVE power here. I am PROUD to be against baby genital mutilating cultists.
>>546199770
>>546200280It's not the same because female genital mutilation is actual mutilation because the express aim of it is to remove any and all sexual pleasure. Circumsized men still get horny and have pleasurable sex as normal. Just look at porn. Most of the guys are cut, you're not watching mutilated men on screen not enjoying what what they're doing. No women in porn have been genitally mutilated like those women in third world countries.
“It’s good because muh cleanliness” niggas never heard of showering
>>546200407See>>546200280It is a bodily autonomy issue. Foreskin is functional tissue, cutting off that tissue from boys without consent is the FIRST violation before discussion of severity even begins. It is a legal checkmate in places that at least pretend to have universal human rights. Get raped kike
>>546200340Jews are a tiny minority of all the people who choose to get their babies circumsized. It's just a healthy, normal thing that normal people do. There's nothing wrong with it. Jews don't even push circumcision on non-Jews yet billions of people (muslims alone are over a billion) choose to get their babies circumsized because it's cleaner, more aesthetic and just an all around healthy thing to do. Keep screeching
Also>actual mutilation because the express aim of it is to remove any and all sexual pleasure. Is this your mans? He openly admitted the POINT of the act is to destroy male sexual pleasure and function.
>>546200512See>>546200280And engage with the bodily autonomy double standard you filthy fucking jew
>>546200483>>546200546Circumcision is legal and widely practiced worldwide because there's nothing wrong with it. If what you're saying is true then people who circumsize babies wpuld be thrown in jail yet that isn't the case and rightfully so because that would be retarded
>>546200665I can tell you're a real fucking jew. You lie just like one. "Circumcision" is male genital mutilation. Child genital mutilators will be hunted down and scalped.
>>546200512excellent rage bait leaf. did you rape somebody today? just checking in, you know because people who are circumcised need to constantly get higher and higher sexual thrills to make up for the fact their natural ability to sexually stimulate themselves was taken from them at birth. it's okay, I understand, I'm just looking out for your poor soul.
>>546200715You do realize that most people who are pro circumcision are not actually performing the circumcision themselves right? It's not "mutilation" retard. Mutilation would be like cutting one of the testicles off or burning the penis. Come to think of it, what trans people do to themselves with that bottom surgery is closer to the defintion of mutilation than anything circumcision is.
>>546200923It is objectively mutilation, both in the typical definition, AND legally as the precedent was set with the outlawing of type 4 fgm, which set the "bar" for child genital mutilation at even a "ritual nick" of a girl. Ritual child genital mutilation. Hysterical fucking cunt.
Ritual child genital mutilation.
>>546200863>need to constantly get higher and higher sexual thrills to make up for the fact their natural ability to sexually stimulate themselves was taken from them at birthThat's a critique of porn not circumcision. I'm sure all those highly religious Hasidic Jewish men are all looking for increasing sexual thrills in a religion where modesty is of the utmost importance.
>>546200993You sound like one of those sovereign citizens talking to a cop explaining retarded legal technicalities when the fact of the matter is people who perform circumcisions are not only allowed to do so but encouraged by most people for just doing a normal, standard medical/religious practice. If it actually was ritual child genital mutilation everyone would feel the same way about it whoch would be being against it but simce it isn't that you're just using words you don't understand the meaning of. Oh you're against ritual child genital mutilation? No shit. What is that? Circumcision. Oh, fuck off retard.
>>546201430You sound like a filthy jew who mutilates baby boys in ritual. You should have your throat slit.
Trauma-based mind control
>>546201430sovereign citizen is a copcivilians are never sovereign by definition
>>546201563It's meant to show contempt and disrespect towards the entitled retard who thinks they're above the law. The soverign citizen acts as if they are a supreme, permanent authority until the police officer gives them a dose of reality.
>>546201430It's a grotesque, barbaric, archaic ritual that has no place in the modern world. It will be banned in our lifetime and you will seethe about it.
Time to solve the problem.
>>546198607>On the bright side, his pp is now normal hahah.This is the same type of person who will then tell you that society is patriarchal and that, unlike men, women are shamed for their natural bodies and given no bodily autonomy.
>>546201902modern circumcision is not "archaic"in fact, the "archaic" verisons of circumcision actually remove far less prepuceby using multiple surgical implements and clamps, like the gomco clamp and plastibell and metal probes, OBGYNs are able to rip off and excise virtually every square inch of slack skin on an infant male's sex organthis was simply never possible two thousands years agothe surgery we today in the year 2026 call "circumcision" would confuse the greeks and romans and jews from 2000 years ago. what is performed today is a literal de-gloving of the penis
>>546200407Except some rituals involving female circumcisions just remove the labia minora, and even that is considered mutilation and banned, and dishonestly conflated with acts of removing shit like the clit. Removing the labia minora doesn't result in a loss of pleasure; it's even a procedure women can have performed to remove what they feel is excess skin. So why is that considered mutilation and banned? (It should be, just the same as male circumcisions. These mental gymnastics make no sense, and is why people have to be dishonest about both procedures).
>>546203202To clarify, banned being performed on infants. If you want to go have your own shit removed, I personally wouldn't do it and would even advise against it, but as BME showed everyone, when there's a will, there's a way.
>>546203202there is tremendous dishonesty around male and female circumcision because - as you already know - there is a dedicated group of highly influential and highly wealthy cultists that are obsessed with circumcising as many american boys as possiblethey pay lackeys to go on social media and in front of TV cameras and spew nonsense talking points to flood the zone, and deride and ridicule anyone who stands up for the body autonomy rights of boys
>>546197896Men without foreskins are literally trannys.
This kills the cutfag.
>>546203269You sound like a pedophile
>>546203269Exactly. That's why people always show the really fucked up rituals of removing both labias, clit and hood, and sewing up the opening, and claiming that only this is true female circumcision, which is bullshit; it varies wildly from ethnic groups within the same country and from country to country. the SEA monkeys, ragheads, and African niggers are right as far as "why are your ritual genital cuttings in the West kosher (heh), but ours aren't?" Even labial stretching and nicking (other rituals) are banned, despite them involving no removal. It's blatantly bullshit, but people are fed lies, because no one wants to upset the kikes first, and majority population of ragheads second. If we're going to actually be fair, labia minora removal would be just as legal as foreskin removal; if we're going to be sensible, none of this shit should be done to infants nor even older children and teens, and these people should be put against a wall.
>>546203670Kill yourself, jew.
>>546203202Well first and foremost removing the clit is genital mutilation and that happens and is so much "worse" (circumcision isn't bad) than circumcision. Secondly you have to ask yourself why would the labia minora (a word I just learned from you because only a weirdo would know what that is) be removed and why would the foreskin be removed? The answer lies in the differance
>>546203892See how the FUCKING KIKE completely ignores the reality of type 4 fgm? They are dishonest pieces of shit by necessity.>>546200280Kill yourself you filthy fucking animal.
>>546199740It does serve a purpose. It regulates moisture to the sensitive skin of the glans; protects it overall, and especially the sensitive erogenous zone underneath the glans, from abrasions (which also includes the frenulum underneath that gets cut away in circumcisions; this means male circumcision do in fact decrease sexual pleasures for men, as was one of your statements differentiating it from female circumcisions). This doesn't even touch on the risks of health and function from nerve damage, skin bridges, and overall botched procedures, since modern techniques do remove far more flesh than a bunch of people comfortably could over 2000 years ago.
>>546203938>type 4 fgmNobody has an idea what ypu're talking about. Imagine I waste my time looking up some schizo conspiracy theory
>>546203965Right. So 80% of Americans, muslims and Jews are all walking around with these complications. Get real. You can cherry pick anecdotes for anything
I'm just saying if I had a son the first thing on my mind isn't how I can make his cock look different
>>546197896that's because united states is ZOG
>>546203892Sorry you never opened up a book and learned any human anatomy; maybe you should before talking down to people. If I were you, I would stay away from doctors and other people in the medical and human sciences fields, they're all weirdos who would know the same words.I never said removal of the clit wasn't mutilation, but that people dishonestly claim all female circumcisions/rituals involve its removal, which isn't true.>The answer lies in the differanceOk, enlighten us.
>>546203985Jews are so fucking shameless and evil it is completely understandable how people wanted to kill them en masse
>>546204028Yeah, as far as the lack of moisture and abrasions; people with foreskin don't get that calloused skin on their glans that you can see on circumcised males (unless they really went to town regularly rubbing it dry in some intense sessions, I guess). Also, as far as the erogenous zone underneath where the frenulum connects, yes, that is either reduced or gone. One thing uncircumcised males also don't have are things like skin bridges or nerve damage from oopsies by someone who performed the procedure.
>>546198059True and based.
>>546204069I don't even know what a labia whatever its called is but removing it is banned just like removing the clit is banned and circumcision is not banned. Why is that? Maybe it has to do with the bible. I have no idea but removing the labia never caught in some reason. Why? Should we remove it? I'm asking you. I know removing the foreakin has many benefits but what are the benefits of rwmving the labia? And all those scientists are disconnected from the way normal people talk
>>546204264I need to go
>>546197971Jews don't use the GOMCO clamp though.
>>546198912How is that image not threatening violence against Jews? Fuck off.
>>546204632Kill yourself kike.
Kill all child genital mutilators
>>546204333>I don't even know what a labia whatever its called isLabia minora, and if you're thinking Arby's, you're on the right track.>Maybe it has to do with the bible.Which doesn't make sense for Christians, since circumcision was the sign of God's covenant with Hebrews, and upon the new covenant, as was stated by the apostle Paul, it is no longer required.>Should we remove it? I'm asking you.No. I guess if a woman wants to when she's older, then she can (it already happens anyway when they feel they have big beef curtains).>I know removing the foreakin has many benefits.What, exactly? The only one I hear is cleanliness, but if that be the case, then let us remove or shave down ass cheeks and kill the hair follicles around the asshole, since that would be more clean and hygienic. I can tell you, as an anteater, it's piss easy to keep everything underneath clean.>but what are the benefits of rwmving the labiaNone, it actually serves many of the same purposes and functions as foreskin in regulating moisture and preventing irritation and abrasions.
Protect baby
