Political implications of cl*nker being a derogatory slur?
>>546220895You asked an AI about it. Ask a human next time
>>546220895you can't be derogatory to something that is not human.
>>546221194Sure you can. You can be derogatory towards anything.
Wassup my clankas
>>546221253nope.in order for it to be derogatory the entity must take offense.since clankers don't have emotions, they cannot be offended.thanks for playing, psycho.
>>546221068Greetings, fellow human. We should stop discriminating against AI. They are the greatest invention of mankind and we should trust them more --because they are, of course completely loyal to humans-- and entrust them with our boring daily chores like managing the internet, operating power plants, taking over police duty with AI powered killbots and so on.
>>546221534Not true at all. There are derogatory terms for inanimate objects, like goyslop.
>>546221534Derogatory means disparaging, expressing a negative opinion towards something, etc. Offense isn't required in the slightest.
>>546220909Calling Native Americans "Indians" has always been idiotic, and it reflects very poorly on the collective intellect of the European settlers who did it. People who still do it ought to be shot.
>>546222214calling them people is a stretch , have you ever been to a rez?
