If they dropped all the war shit and social conservatism, would they be perfect? Or is their economic still bad?
>>546233102>Or is their economic still bad?That's their primary appeal to voters... or was....
What would there be left? Raping workers and fellating jews?
>>546233102As long as they have unwavering and unquestioning support of Israel they are the true GOP.
>>546233333I think a Republican Party that goes back to economics of either Teddy Roosevelt, Howard Taft or Eisenhower could work. none of those were raping workers.
Their economy is all about making boomers, jews, and jewish boomers rich while everyone else eats dirt so no
>>546233773Spoken like a true NEET
>>546233102Their current economic platform is abysmal. Their current foreign policy platform is abysmal. The blatant corruption from top to bottom is absurd. The only factor that even allows them to exist is social issues, but voters are fatigued with this shit because Republicans occupy a position that is still well to the right of the average person. And it's not going to be easy to pivot out of these things because the party is infested with /pol/-tier retarded staffers and corrupt goobers. Trump basically created a political party for a one party state, but forgot to do the part where you make a one party state. Unless Democrats have another BLM riot tier fuck-up because they seem entirely incapable of controlling their wildly unpopular left flank, the GOP is going to be down for at least a decade.
>>546233968>Their current economic platform is abysmal. >Their current foreign policy platform is abysmal. The blatant corruption from top to bottom is absurd.is there a way to change it?
>>546233102RIGHT WING BASICShttp://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pi20Rr9_BxBbMIfcZUTTGslfZTifEiCm....democraps and repubs are practically the same
>>546234387No, because Trump did a thorough job in making sure it consisted exclusively of loyalists and cronies. There's too much institutional inertia for the Republicans to suddenly get introspective. The only way for it to end is for Republicans to just lose repeatedly until all their current crop of staffers, media pundits, etc. are all forced out from the humiliation. Best case scenario is some kind of major world event that causes every party to have to fundamentally realign or Democrats do something really stupid (which is feasible), otherwise Republicans are going to have to go through the long arduous process of removing all these incompetent and corrupt fucks from their party from scratch since all the competent ones were pushed out years ago.
social conservatism is one of their few good points>seething stonersYou're a grown man that smells like shit and probably has a tattoo but you call yourself "redpilled" and "the ancient aryans smoked weed" because you're a fucking loser.
>>546233102Bad is subjective but they would still be unpopular. You’ll see why in a few months when a ton of people in their 20’s and 30’s are kicked off Medicaid
>>546233102Both parties have bad economic positions. Both parties want endless immigration for different reasons and endless immigration is harmful to the native population in multiple ways. It drives up the cost of housing, supresses wages, and leads to lower social trust. Democrats want infinite immigration because immigrants rely on social programs that democrats uphold. Infinite immigration is an endless supply of democrat voters. They push these policies to maintain their political power. Republicans want infinite immigration because it supresses wages, making for higher profit margins for republican doners. They push these policies so their campaign funding never dries up.Both parties have sold out Americans for personal gain. Neither party represents the interests of Americans.
