All law is derived from Roman law because Roman law is still in effect The nation state is an illusion to create the need for societal order One that need reaches critical mass the Roman Authority will reclaim it's sovereignty over all nation states
>>546234624If you were God, would you whip yourself to battle?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCFB1rjq11c
>>546234888I'd stretch out my hand and make a banquet for my enemies and all who attend would be forgiven
>>546235180Mm. That's where you and me are different. For if I were God, I would look around me, and find all these "people" lacking. For their pride and insolance I will cast them to a level lower than a dog, and teach them right from wrong with a stick and bread. Pan o palo.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k26mY1n5HSY
>>546234624WHITE POWERRRRRRRRRRRRR
>>546235808ANOTHERRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>>546234624>derived from Roman law Can you quote the actual law that you’re talking about?
>>546234624Why did jannies just delete a thread about the slaughter at Waco? Is that not a political topic? It wasn't even anti-semitic?
>>546235977Roman law is the name we use in English to define the diametric opposite of constitutionl or sovereign law. Roman relied on an unwritten, flexible tradition known as mos maiorum ("custom of the ancestors") and a mixed system of checks and balances among magistrates, the Senate, and assemblies, rather than a single codified document. This differs from sovereign law which recognises, usually in writing impassable rights which grant the citizens sovereignty, usually over the state itself. The problem is that sovereign law only works with a contained homogeneous society. Foreigners always require the imposition of Roman law as a sovereign situation doesn't grant them anything and ensures they remain a foreigner in a foreign land.
>>546237696Isn't roman law also called canon law?So would this mean soverign law is more like tribal law? How does the subject/citizen difference manifest here?Where does the whole maritime law thing fit into this?
>>546238205Im too tired to write the massive posts these questions demand.>Isn't roman law also called canon law?No. Canon is an entirely catholic idea, whereby the church is the definitive arbitrator or justice, morality and rule.So would this mean soverign law is more like tribal law?Not necessarily. This is why I mentioned that sovereign laws only work in a homogeneous society. Fractures along ethnic and group identity lines would almost certainly lead to a tribal type hierarchy.>How does the subject/citizen difference manifest here?Citizen is from the Russian I think and means to have the right to come and go; its a legal defn implying passport ownership. Subjects are proles who collectively accept the governance of a monarchy. >Where does the whole maritime law thing fit into this?The british union was born as an administrative entity when it commandeered the English navy under the pretense of continuing the good protestant work of outlawing slave trading in the Americas. The union operated under English maritime law which it took as its own verbatim. Following the voter reform acts of 1894 the union then in the occupied English parliament tried to form a new legal system which would trump the English constitution, and cancel the sovereign rights it gave. As they had slyed their way in, they had to sly the laws in to, and so they replaced the judiciary and court rules with their own british naval law. So to answer that, the british union originally was maritime law, but now after sufficient parliamentary acts and amendments it now appears to be declaring itself sovereign above God. Remnants of the law persists, because it never went away and was foundational in creating the acts of the union parliament.
>>546239631Thank you for the more detailed reply than I had expected.
>>546239631What might you suggest reading to understand the "british union" thing, I'd not heard of it before.
>>546235566That's why I'm god and you're not
