/pol/ - Will it land? - Politically Incorrect

Anonymous (ID: 2FpiAqX1) Archived

11/14/26(Sat)15:58:02 No.546234728

File: file.png (2.04 MB, 2004x1088)

2.04 MB PNG

Anonymous (ID: 2FpiAqX1) 11/14/26(Sat)15:58:02 No.546234728 Archived

Will it land?

Anonymous (ID: 55ph8y3P)
11/14/26(Sat)15:59:27 No.546234804

Anonymous (ID: 55ph8y3P) 11/14/26(Sat)15:59:27 No.546234804

33.33 (repeating of course) percentage of survival.

Anonymous (ID: yZXMphQb)
11/14/26(Sat)16:01:38 No.546234926

Anonymous (ID: yZXMphQb) 11/14/26(Sat)16:01:38 No.546234926

>>546234728
Wtf does it have a stiffy?

Anonymous (ID: SwsKb81J)
11/14/26(Sat)16:11:31 No.546235494

Anonymous (ID: SwsKb81J) 11/14/26(Sat)16:11:31 No.546235494

>>546234804
ok, let's do this

Anonymous (ID: +5aMbIsf)
11/14/26(Sat)16:13:22 No.546235590

Anonymous (ID: +5aMbIsf) 11/14/26(Sat)16:13:22 No.546235590

>>546234926
That is more of a nose. ooze comes out either way.

Anonymous (ID: SwsKb81J)
11/14/26(Sat)16:23:41 No.546236094

Anonymous (ID: SwsKb81J) 11/14/26(Sat)16:23:41 No.546236094

well, that was cool
can't wait for thunderfag to seethe about it

Anonymous (ID: LZq0dLLE)
11/14/26(Sat)16:34:42 No.546236661

Anonymous (ID: LZq0dLLE) 11/14/26(Sat)16:34:42 No.546236661

democrats seething rn

Anonymous (ID: ob9RvJQo)
11/14/26(Sat)16:35:43 No.546236715

Anonymous (ID: ob9RvJQo) 11/14/26(Sat)16:35:43 No.546236715

republicans seething rn

Anonymous (ID: LZq0dLLE)
11/14/26(Sat)16:37:09 No.546236790

Anonymous (ID: LZq0dLLE) 11/14/26(Sat)16:37:09 No.546236790

actually dems are happy since they will nationalise spacex

Anonymous (ID: Qrceeny7)
11/14/26(Sat)16:39:32 No.546236925

Anonymous (ID: Qrceeny7) 11/14/26(Sat)16:39:32 No.546236925

i don't care

Anonymous (ID: M6IdxMve)
11/14/26(Sat)16:42:32 No.546237081

Anonymous (ID: M6IdxMve) 11/14/26(Sat)16:42:32 No.546237081

>>546236790
>they will nationalise spacex
And with that you mean bailout with tax money.

Anonymous (ID: FdSQlwWL)
11/14/26(Sat)16:43:13 No.546237115

Anonymous (ID: FdSQlwWL) 11/14/26(Sat)16:43:13 No.546237115

>>546237081
>>546236790
>>546236715
>>546236661
>>546236094
Space shuttle did it first

Anonymous (ID: SwsKb81J)
11/14/26(Sat)17:13:23 No.546238552

Anonymous (ID: SwsKb81J) 11/14/26(Sat)17:13:23 No.546238552

>>546237115
space shuttle couldn't be flown to Mars
there's order of magnitude more capacity on starship than on the shuttle. Space shuttle had no commercial application
but yeah, technically true