What if the Democrats lose seats in 2028 because they do something stupid before the presidential election? Will the GOP take back the House and the Senate then?
>>546249714The Democrats will continue to bow to Israel for two more years and Americans will finally start to discuss revolution against the jewish constitutional republican order that has enslaved us
>>546249714God I wish it were me
Cute wolfThe 2028 senate is probably out of our reach at this point desu. Even if blumpfs approval rating miraculously improves. We’d need Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and one blue state, two if we lose the presidency. Fetterman is openly talking about leaving the Democrat party which is good. The former Republican governor of Georgia said he’s running for a senate seat in 28 which will help. That’s leaves us needing 4-5 more. The more realistic scenario is to eek out a presidential win, pick up 2 or 3 senate seats and MAYBE retake congress. We can get the senate back in 2030. Again all of this hinges on Trump getting the fuck out of the way and letting us fix the party. Good luck with that.
>>546250446I see.
>>546249714The GOP doesn't have 2 testicles in the same sack. They'd have to win people back and they won't.
>>546250446>letting us fix the party. Good luck with that.you dont need to "fix the party" as a protest vote on the economy works both ways. The Dems will lose seats in 28 simply because they will not anything substantial other than woke grandstanding that goes no where for the next two years. The reason they will do that is because they cannot do anything else. People did not vote for Dems, they voted against the Repubs.
>>546249714The Democrats were voted in to stop the war in Iran, lower prices for working families, and end Jewish interests. Instead they will try and ban guns and shove woke policies down everyone’s throat. So yes it will most likely flip red in 28 depending who has the more interesting presidential pick.
it is over
>>546251299This is probably correct. If Dems were smart, they would line up as much popular shit as they could and dare Trump to veto it. But they'll probably just impeach and fail again, or pass a national tranny law that nobody wants.
>>546251465Their problem is there is nothing in the Dem universe that is economically popular. They last time the Dems did anything for a normal economy was...I cannot even remember, the only thing that comes to mind was Dodd Frank. Since Obama left and Trump came, they have only been about two things: TDS and woke. They lost traditional labor voting blocks doing that. Dems have never been the party of normal economics, the Repubs are (even if its because the Dems aren't). They are about raising taxes and wealth redistribution. The only thing that lends to job growth they do is labor union shit (which is dead) or government money to think tanks and NGOs (USAID).Too the great unwashed, the economy is 1. Inflation and 2. gas prices. The only part of the Iran war that matted to gas prices was speculation driving the price up a bit, but refinery issues are more to blame than anything else. Nothing the Dems can or would do about that. Inflation? Thats not possible to solve without...large amounts of organic ecomomic growth. Both parties grew the debt tremendously during COVID, which is why you have inflation. And neither party wants to cut spending, as thats the only reason congressmen make bank (kickbacks, bribes, and insider trading info).
>>546251370>>546251897Could be.
>>546251897And on top of that, you have both financialization and technological replacement of human labor (which really has not been about AI), which is the core issue about jobs. Technology has been an issue for a while, but it was masked by economic and population growth. Transitioning from manufacturing to knowledge work did not help either. There are very little to none menial or lightly skilled jobs out there anymore tha pay a wage people (especially young people) feel pay the bills, and that makes people get off their ass to vote against whoever is in charge without knowing or really caring what the issues actually are.Aspects of both parties know this. Others do not (or know but dont care because x issue is more important to them).
>>546249714Who gives a shit, they both play for the same team
>>546249714THAT'S A MAN
Final thought: Dems had a discipline adavantage a long time, a great deal of party unity when it came to voting. They dont have that anymore (at least publically). The wokes and the commies are emboldened are likely to scuttle any legislation that does not include what they want, and including what they want will just cause the legislation to be a taken as a non-serious joke that will get vetoed anyway. Thats why Schumer is geting challenged; Van Hollen is a wokie, and does not think that Schumer will run the Senate in support of the woke. Both Schumer and Jefferies know the perdicament they are in, but their freshmen congressmen dont.
>>546249714The Democrats will never lose again. They have the first of many caravans on the way, they'll easily outvote all the natives in 4 years.
>>546249714With the way Iran has been handled, the odds of republicans of being in power again are slim to none.
Data mining thread. You’ve been warned
>>546249714You sure love spamming the gypsie furry
>>546251054This.The GOP's talking points are "The Dems are crazy, but we're impotent."
