What side is pol on?
>>546256448Capitalism is not prefect but is much better that the "solution"
>>546256448
>>546256524you are confusing this with right vs left, the pic in op is about centrist neoliberals vs democratic socialists
>>546256582>centrist neoliberalsmiggers
>>546256448I've gone socialist as fuck lately. I didn't used to be. But watching billionaires spend 10 straight years price gouging us will do that. I even got to witness the first trillionaire. That one guy has more wealth than 53% of us combined. So I see how the whole guillotine thing happened.
>>546256448The side that allows my kids to get jobs and start a life (and doesn't fuck them )
>>546257458b-but muh free market and muh american free enterprise system>>546257692remember Le trente glorieuses
>>546256448National Socialism
>>546258417from a warmongering country of free citizens to a warmongering country of slaves
>>546256448Abundance used to be a Republican idea, they called it "trickle down economics"but then billionaires bought the Democrats too
(((zuylen wood)))abundance for jews and the 1% maybe lol
>>546256448The schism is over Israel. But expect a lot of these articles skirting around that and highlighting something else while the democrat establishment continues to unconditionally support israel
>>546256448The one that kills as much kikes as possible.
>vote for me and we're all gonna be rich!I don't know what that side represents in the Democratic party but you'd be dumb not to vote for that guy. Don't you want to be rich?
>>546256448Systems thinking people favor that which works with proper failure modes. Free market capitalism is by far the most sensible system meant address failures, and favor productivity. A strong private sector cab easily fuel a better government that administrates public matters, such as public infrastructure security, technical education, etc.Socialism ensures megalomaniacs in power can't fail regardless of how incompetent they become over time. It makes the entire nation the private property of a few people who promise to redistribute whatever is (not?) produced fairly, but once you give them all the power they no longer have to pretend they care about you.
Bernie Sander and Trump agree about more than they disagree about (horseshoe, etc.), but the 'liberal' side of US politics is afraid to point this out.Left vs. right isn't the dimension of politics anymore, it's populist-authoritarian vs. liberal-technocratic.
>>546256448Abundance for who exactly
>>546256448Socialism is an outdated system based on antiquated theories that simply are not valid in the modern world.For example: one of the core thesis of socialism is that because of the slow speed at which information travels, the price for an item can never be updated quickly enough for any given transaction to be based on the actual value of an item at that time and thus all transaction must be exploitative.However, thanks to computers we can now update prices in near-real time meaning the prices for items are almost always representative of their actual value.
>>546259550>However, thanks to computers we can now update prices in near-real time meaning the prices for items are almost always representative of their actual value.That won't be exploited by companies.. nah...
>>546257458None of those statements follow from any of the others.Your entire philosophy seems to be just being mad that somebody else has more stuff than you.
>>546259005Communism is ontologically evil and must be destroyed
>>546259550>we can now update prices in near-real time meaning the prices for items are almost always representative of their actual value.Ideally it would be their "actual value". But on the flip side it can be used to jack up the price depending on who's buying it and how desperate you are. "Dynamic pricing" can basically just be personalized price gouging. >But that isn't the price it said on the shelf!>Supply and demand bro.
>>546259421Authoritarianism will never be populist because in general people dont like being forced to do things
>>546259591Smash your computer, smash your phone and go live naked in the woods
>>546259593No, if you check the statements the anger actually stems from having less and less. The fact that it's being caused by the people who have more and more is coincidental. . ....and hazardous to their health if the trend continues
>>546259704But you dont have less.You feel like you do because you want more than anyone in history has ever had.Thats naked greed
>>546259704Also, you wont do shit you little pussy faggot.Talk shit on the internet like a bitch
>>546257458>trillionaireHis wealth is in SpaceX and Tesla shares. He cannot really sell those without crashing their price.Funny how you left out those many families/dynasties with much more wealth and way more real world influence. As if focusing on this rocket guy hides them.
>>546259736>But you dont have less.>You feel like you do because.....Because it takes 50% more to buy everything? Nigga, that IS less. America spent an extra $98 billion this year just to fill up their tank alone. And that's money we don't fucking have. But assholes like you bury their heads in the sand cause you don't wanna believe it's actually getting worse out there. Enjoy your blue wave. Keep not listening to us, see what happens.
>>546259869Sorry I don't have a metric for secret dynasties. But the guy who dropped half a billion trying to buy a single senate seat is an obvious target for my ire.
I don't think /pol/ knows who Ezra Klein is or what makes the Aboooondance neoliberals different from Berniecrats
>>546259752>Also, you wont do shit you little pussy faggot.We're currently still on the First Box of Liberty. Luckily for him.
>>546256448Socialism
>>546256448I LOST, TRANNY!!!!!
>>546256448Certainly not on the "Democratic Party's" side.If there is a split/divide/"schism" within it, both sides are retarded.
