Nobody really cares about democracy or dictatorship; practically anyone would trade their freedom to "vote" for a ruler to have a more decent life.
Don't you have a queer communist for Palestine protest to be at chang
Voting makes sure you are not stuck with a dictator who does not care about you at all.
What is it like to be attract to women?
whats with the memeflag??
this is a spam thread op doesn't care what you say the pic is to bait coomers the text is to bait retards
>>546272074Zamanbek, you’re too early. Americans still asleep.
>>546272044>Voting makes sure you are not stuck with a dictator who does not care about you at all.instead you get criminal pedos, niggers, or retards who do not care about you at allbig improvment
>>546271956
>>546271956>Nobody really cares about democracy or dictatorshipI do, I would rather be free and poor than in a supermax prison with a 'better standard of life'.With dictators you are always at their mercy, you are basically a pet that can be discarded, a product. Only jeets prefer that to freedom
>>546271956I'm at a point in time where I think female rights and democracy was a mistake
>>546271956They used to say that a bad democracy is still better than a bad dictator.But a bad democracy wouldn't care about your vote, and would therefore be the same as a bad dictator.
>>546271956this is what the chinese really believe
>>54627195690% side with the winners to max(consume)Other 10% hold independent convictions and wont be bribed
>>546271956What if the dictator banned the thing you like to do?
>>546271956I would bash someone's head in just to have a chance at a girl like that.
>>546271956Snugly wrapped though that womb may be, it's not safe from a good ripening, young lady.
if that's the truth, why was the berlin wall built to prevent people from running away from a dictatorship? People always want to leave dictatorships (see Cuba), while commies defend those regimes from the comfort of their houses in a non commie country
>>546272239What is with you and dykesAre you a chick dude or is this some kind of fetish
>>546271956>to have a more decent life.Jesus fucking christ you're dumb...The whole point is to have a better life.When we lived under the dictators called "kings", they would use entire countries for vanity projects and war, none of which ever had any benefit for the people.The entire reason we have anything OTHER THAN THAT is because of people fighting back against their rulers, culminating in elections and eventually whatever comes next now that they're abusing this system too.
>>546272239Those are both men.
>>546271956I disagree, if the vote counter for something. Albeit, you'd have to restructure the current system of power quite a bit and probably undergo a kind of revolt against the authoritarian system we currently have, clandestinely. Currently, the system can arbitrarily torture and coerce you by ever developing means. A low-tech society, compared to what is being developed in the shadows, with an armed populace and a system of ownership that facilitated small ownership over what we currently have would mean that the ruling bodies would be dependent on cooperation from the populace, in myriad ways. A decent life is one where you have a degree of autonomy when it comes to being able to decide the kind of life you want to lead. The current model of "democracy", as opposed to actual direct democracy with a higher degree of government transparency, has produced a system where SDGs dictate the way you eat, waste the time of every single person forced to go to school, in order to brainwash them into adopting or adapting to what is currently the equivalent of global communism of the past. Every single dollar/eurobuck you have in your back is probably being used to fund SDG-compliant or advancing efforts through the bank's own investment activities, while finding a bank that did not engage in such practices and pursuing SDG-compliancy as a policy is just about impossible, at least where I live. We live in a totalist dystopia. I would choose freedom.
