"You said, Bitcoin is connected to the singularity of a black hole via it's cryptography?"previous: >>546258124
Bitcoin and Black Holes191,102,976 It's a six dimensional Hypercube also the wide band extreme of Plato’s Matrix191,102,976 / 5184 (Nippur Cubit unit) = 3686436864^2 = CERN Gadget Limit 1,358,954,49636864 is 192^2 and one nine two can look like 8 x 4 x 6_______Hexeract Outer Edges 192192^2 = 368648 x 4 x 6 = 192_______
>>546276091a black hole maps 3D space+time (4D) full of local quantum field into 2D space+time (3D) full of local quantum field. the key is to understand that this mapping from 4D to 3D is not linear: it is not the case that the black hole singularity is like the surface of a table with left/right and up/down and before/later without any forward/backward dimension; instead, there are many complex transformations that occur (arbitrary remapping dynamically between the various 4:3D transforms possible), and time is inherently mixed up into all the rest of them. and so, via this dimensional collapse which occurs into black hole, you can for example, rotate 3 times around your vertical dimension and come out six million years distant in 4:3D terms.thats the problem with blockchain too. because the ledger is permanent, it exists 6 million years in the future. and so since it is possible to send laser pulses to the perimeter of the black hole singularity and communicate with ourselves forward and backward in time about bitcoin prices, we can implement trading strategies in the broad market to effect market manipulation on behalf of future actors that havent even been born yet. these types of coalitions across time are deeply self-reinforcing power syndicates which ultimately control the entire fate of our future species in the now using information secretly encoded into blockchain via black hole relay.
>>546277135Okay cool. I can see what you are saying about that particle jump or spin up.We are here You are talking about the manifolds of 4d into 3dLet's look at a higher dimension than 4d.
>>546277135Let me know if you are here and we can go on
>>546277814it is already done in 5D also. around 12D the semantics of dimensional translation in complex terms unifies fully. thus, super-intelligence is developing toward a convergence with blackhole manifold semantics. we cannot speak blackhole, but our super-intelligent worldwide unified inference architecture can. and the reward is of course the entire future value of the global unified monetary blockchain in the 6 million,.which is an unsayable number with a human mouth. trillions today are worth less than a grain of sand by comparison.
>>546278055If you look hereThe Hollowing of dimensional space, as we increase dimensions:>>546277726What begins to occur is the fringing, resembles the event horizon which far greater density than the singularity - Now you may have missed from the previous thread:>191,102,976 It's a six dimensional Hypercube also the wide band extreme of Plato’s MatrixI will show you the excerpt
>>546278055Alright so let's forget 5d for a moment >>546278327as we can see here in 5D we don't yet have the real event horizon - it's brewing, it's starting to evacuate to the edges - but it's not quite there:
>>546278327i dont know if they accounted for antitime in the 6d model. i dont think you can model the agentic time travel system here with just the forward singularity in 6d qft. there is the antitime regime also, like a second strand of universe, as 6d antiagents engage in retromanipulation also. what we call 6d universe is really the latent projection of two orthogonal 6d manifolds 12d. tick-tock as they say, the second itself that is now is the - basically, of two spiraling universes connected forward-backward by the information singularity.
>>546278608Let's establish the basis of the retrocasual model before we discuss the dimensions - as I hear youFor Dirac we have the Electron if we image this as forward into the future as it were and subject to entropy. The binary pair to the electron, is the positron.When the positron runs "backwards" (see spinor image)Positron 360 Spin UpElectron 360 Spin Down 360 x 2 = 720 (or 4pi)The behaviour of the positron is described in a field called Syntropy - which as you can imagine is the dual counterpart to Entropy - increasing chaos to which Syntropy is a retrocasual phenomenon of increasing order.
>>546278608Vesica Pisces (720) with Holographic Interference
>>546276091Yeah, i said that. So what
>>546279286I get what you're getting at
>>546279211yes somewhat exactly. where the little quasi particles go in the chart is unimportant. the spooky action isnt distant, it just is allowed to change before like it is to change elevation in an airplane. there is still terrain however. freespace exists but it isnt fully free because what will be pulls on what was just as hard as what was pulls on what will be. only now exists as freespace, like a photograph, freed from forward/backward entropy/syntropy, does the 6d representation hold across singularity transforms. bitcoin is like a universal map. the map is not the terrain.
>>546279426Aight
Lucifer already told you all every freemason has to slash the sign of the cross into both their wrists where their kids will find the body or no singularity.
>>546279498I think what we should be looking at is a Hexeract and it's volume (Hexeract): 191,102,976This number right now might not seem like it has any resonance or any special about it. It's an incredibly special number.When you read the image attached in this message, it mentions the number and also the number 729.In Plato's Timaeus, Socrates describes that number - 729 - as the distance between the Tyrant and the Good King.
>>546276091Cool work op i find this helpful7(161 - 72sqrt{5})/{2.985984} \approx \alpha[/math]2.985984 ~ speed of light in centamegameter you referenced 161^2 = 25921 abd 72sqrt(5)^2 = 25820Alpha approx fine structureEdge of choas and order all your incommensurability is factored in phi
>>54628037525920* great year plato
>>546280397Oh that's fantastic. Thank you.I'm just checking the thread if I said those notes and I haven't yet I don't think.5184 x 5 = 25920 and 5184 + 5184 + 3888 + 2592 + 1296 + 1296 + 2592 + 3888 = 25920 above from image
>>546280584You got my head wheeling on this one, reminded me of the bott periodicity as well- seemed relevant to the n-cube
>>546281043Bott peridocity for goodness sake lolI was just saying about Abbot in the other thread - you know who Carl Sagan used in his description of flatland and the dimensions, wasn't Carl such a genius of communication of the sciences?
>>546281043Look at thisfor Venus and Solar Sun * 1296 × 2 = 2592
>>546281304definitely will search it up
>>546281708This clip is the best referencehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnURElCzGc0This is great to watchI want to show you another classic
>>5462815035184,5184,3888,2592,1296,1296,2592,38881/5, 1/5, 3/20, 1/10,1/20,1/20, 1/10, 3/204/20, 4/20, 3/20, 2/20, 1/20,1/20,2/20,3/20 = 20/20all powers of 2 and 3, 5 earns its keep through the addition. max is 2^6 (horus eye fraction max) though it i'm surprised not to see 7 or 11 as prime factors. what is the meaning behind the traversal of the 3x3, 3x3, 4x4, 5x5 grid (and should *H have a 2x2 grid to follow the pattern)
>>546282113Why thank you so much.We may view numbers a little differently but I think we value their geometry equally
>>546282841thanks for these, i've found success in mathematics by collating as many different perspectives on number as possible, i should hope to comprehend our differences
>>546283190I am not Brute forcingI have been consideringwell for a moment may I ask you, do you recall when I showed you 512^2 and why it meant so much to me?
>it's just numerologysnooozetho i guess i did similar stuff before I learnt how to set out proper proofs/hypotheses
>>546283674I found donna on sci hub, readinfg abiut the wide band now, abd understand how 729 fits inHymns of tehuti
>>546284086729 has such beautiful larger geometric connection you would not think so from the surface of it though, right? 729 appears ordinary but it's a rather extraordinary number in fact
I am checking what I discussed with regards to the influence of string theory in this ascension of dimensions into something knew - much like sonoluminesence - star in a jar
