MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM I'm not laying down for your stupid People's El-ACK
>>20892758MMMMMMMbased Taker letting his friend go over mmmm pure brotherly love
>>20892758>So I walk up to Mark and I tell him I have this great idea for a spot…
>>20892900facts
>>20892758He didn’t say that.
>>20892758Why did everything look so much better visually back then even though there was no 4k and everything was on tapes?
>>20894231Because the WWE cameracrew weren't having seizures and cutting every alternating second
>>20894231hd killed wrestling and porn
>>20894231Sometimes less detail is better, HD and later 4K has made it painfully obvious what was going on, even if you're not in the know, whereas back in the day, small details were blurred enough that your brain wouldn't actively try to look for them.
>>20892758https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTM1uCrUIEo
>>20894311>>20894241Both true.>>20894242>hd killed wrestling True>and pornDebate table.
>>20894231because shooting on analogue is just better visually than digital.Also the lighting was less harsh back then. Slightly hazy smoky atmosphere in the arenas. Atmosphere was just better
>>20894375I really don't need to see a chick's pores while she's getting railed or any blemishes and specks of who knows what while she's showing off the goods. Love seeing some veins in their tits, but it's sacrifice I'm willing to make
>>20894482ayup
>>20894231precisely because there was no 4k and everything was on tapes
>>20894231It helps that there aren't random LEDS everywhere. LEDs look awful and cheap. Not everything needs to be a screen
>>20894231They wrestled a lot faster back then too
>>20894231>everything was on tapesThere's your answer. They can edit the shit out of their recordings.
>>20894231Film just looks better than digital.
>>20894320thanks for the match but why is the logo censored bro
