Why does WWE keep changing titles with no feuds? They just hot potato titles when it's time to push the new toy, don't give them promo time or feuds, then put the title on the next person
>>21035467the women's midcard titles or whatever don't need a big epic feud attached to them lmao it's just filler
>>21035467they're bleeding viewers and gaytch is flailing
>>21035467There are three scenarios where the belt gets hot-potatoed:>You have multiple main eventers who are all red hot e.g WWF in 1999, WCW in 1998>Despite a few bright spots your wrestling show is completely directionless e.g WWF/E in 2002 and 2009, WCW in 1999, TNA before 2010>Complete pants-shitting desperation e.g WCW 2000, WWE in 2026
>>21035573it would seem that WWE's plan to force faggotry and troons on their audience has backfired. they were actually doing good numbers before that. i think people were already unhappy with the price hikes on everything WWE-related, but when you decide to take a shit on peoples deeply held moral convictions, that brings it to a different level.
>brain fried poltard wants to make every thread about his special interest and nothing else
>>21035645>makes a good point but has to be hyperbolic and kill it at the endWWE 2026 fits better under the middle category. There are clearly a couple bright spots and they still are making money. They are in no way desperate right now. Why do you pretend shitposting on /pw/ is real life?
>>21035851It was more of a comment really
>>21035842>castrated troon freak is still determined to avoid facing the GRIM reality and still afraid that all the astroturfing might not have actually done any good.
>>21035571Also the womeme's champions keep getting injured right after winning it.
>>21035467so? every title change requiring a drawn out feud is a horrible idea.
