>no ambrose>no austin
>>21268401And it didn't need either. The fuck did Austin or Ambrose have to do with Cody or the Bloodline?
>>21268401The last time wrestling felt special.
>>21268413>what did romans tag partner and the rocks life long rival have to do with roman and the rock idk anon what did undertaker have to do with a single person in the ring?
>>21268401This shitfest didn't need more interference
I'm fine with no Ambrose, Seth coming out to their theme and in gear worked well enough. Austin no showing was the only flaw. As cool as it is to have a Rock/Taker moment at WM, Austin arriving to give Rock a stunner and leave would have been better.
>>21268818austin seems like a dickhead
>>21268421HIS. YARD
>>21268421Undertaker feuded with several members of the Bloodline prior and his first match in WWE he went up against Dusty.
>>21268824He had to work with HHH, and no one likes that faggot.
>>21268421>Roman's tag partnerIn the Bloodline?>Rock's life long rivalHis man titties?Neither Austin or Ambrose were needed, no less essential, in telling any part of that story