why is schopenhauer the most based yet under-appreciated philosopher? like i get that it's very common with philosophers to feel general disdain towards women but they express their disdain along the lines of "all women care about is vanity and status hurr durr"and this nigga just 'genius-ly' boils it down to "deception and treachery is inherent in woman for it is a defense mechanism, nullifying her sense of judgement, her biggest evolutionary trait is not fit for modern society where we are far more civil than our barbaric ancestors"why the fuck does everyone just spill their saliva about nietzsche, dostoevsky, kafka, kant, etc, but never this guy?
Even his own mother hated his autistic ass. Only autists love this guy.
>>84684284>he had a shitty motherwhat does that have to do with anything? are you just a salty femoid? lol?
>>84684224Schopenhauer was too powerful for 19th century normies and ahead of his time.
>>84684224The most based philosopher is Jesus and Lao Tzu then maybe Hermes and Diogenes of Sinope
>>84684300holy shit, it's LITERALLY just classic f*m0id cope "baka, wow, incel..." literally no response of substance or anything witty or articulative from these plebbit tards, complete double digit IQ, schopenhauer has a higher IQ than all those commenters combined, lol.the way retarded <100 IQ normgroids react to this guy makes me love him even more
>>84684284Having shitty female relatives (whoa he used the proper age neutral term for the opposite sex crazy I know) regardless of autism makes any attempt at gaslighting males of female nature a joke, they see first hand the tactics used by these remorseless snakes. The players who you opened you legs to knew too don't delude yourself honey.
>>84684300>>84684326Women have always been barred from being taken seriously for as long as we knew how to throw a rock, the moment you let them try shaming tactics and get away with it a simp is born.
>>84684585the "throwing stones in a glass house" saying is almost innate in every single modern woman.
>>84684224>Says they do not have a sense of justice>Also says their "lack of moral justice" is a defense mechanism as the claw is with the lion>Seethes at women defense mechanism is as strong a mf lion's claw (jfc)By today standards, is a sign he wants to troon out
>>84684635this is the beauty of schopenhauer, it's a GENUINE IQ check to understanding it, now run along, retard.
>>84684657Deam anontachi..your experience with a lion's claw was as bad as a woman fucking you up?
>>84684224He was viewed as a negative miser and an bitter old man.
>>84684880if that's your interpretation you're genuinely retarded, like, you are too low IQ to talk to, i don't know what to tell you lol>>84684906angwy f*id
>>84684224dostoevsky's books are slop. They are poor people arguing about poor people things and just being general assholes to one another. The House of the Dead, The Idiot, it's garbage.He has select quotes which convinced me to try his books. But his books suck.Schopenhauer is incredibly based.Glad you think so too, OP.
>>84684321Lao Tzu says the dumbest shit:>When your enemy is making a mistake, don't correct himhow profound.tell us a profound quote by Tzu
>>84684920fellow based understanderi shake hands with you, anon
>>84684585>>84684326>>84684300>>84684224Women are just holes.They classify themselves as holes.They know their only value is being a hole. Many holes.https://youtu.be/28gvMM8KXm4I work weddings. So many brides walk down the aisle to Lana Del Rey - Young and Beautiful.Do you know the lyrics to that song?Look them up.>Will you still love me when I'm no longer young and beautiful?>Will you still love me when I got nothing but my aching soul?>Will you still love me when I'm no longer beautiful?Women walk down the aisle to this, identifying with these lyrics.Women know their only value is looks.Few of them have real skills.Women mistake buying coffee as a personality trait.Men buy into it.Blows my mind.
>>84684224The utility of explaining the ways to live life and the world, etc, of the Religion is completely obselete. The next step in human attempt to explain the universe in form of philosophy has now aged poorly too. Philosophy is completely outdated in the big 2026.Most intelligent people utilize science to explain the universe, not philosophy. The old age logical argument: just because we still don't know a lot of shit doesn't mean that a fantasy explanation is true, a good one, or should be taken super seriously. And some things we'll never know, like the origin of life on this planet. But religion and philosophy will never provide real, true answers either.
>>84684970There are a lot of things that you can't science out so hypotheticals are still incredibly important.
>>84685041>so hypotheticals are still incredibly important.Of course, the utility imagination and fantasy are not to be diminished nor discarded.>There are a lot of things that you can't science outYet. Of course. The scientific progress is moving faster and faster. We've essentially deciphered human learning with the neural networks, the (verbal) interactions of the brain with the world through the algorithms used for LLMs. They also might not be 100% accurate yet, sure, but it does work on a pretty decent level.The human brain, i.e. the biological cental processing unit of evolved forms of life will be completely understood, sooner or later.
>>84684918His argument about women tumbled down when ruse=defense system.Complaining the defense system defends is seething his defense system does not work against women's defense system>Women are the weaker sexIs like expecting they should not had a defense system at all but knows they had and is mad; and says they do not have morals and are entitled since their defense system is effective like a lion's claw against him.Dancing to the melody of such jazz outs the dancer as someone who was outsmarted by a woman lol.
>>84684224I noticed nietzsche and kant are famous because they're difficult to read. The will to power stuff sounds like some violent power fantasy and we love that crap as long as it's tame sexually
>>84685503Nietzsche is not difficult very difficult to read, especially compared to Kant. The will to power is not some violent power fantasy whatsoever.
>>84684224he got mogged by Hegel into obscurity with his neo bhuddist hindu oriental takes
>>84684224He's not underrated at all, he's known as one of the most influential philosophers of his time. You just don't hear about him as much as Nietzsche, but Nietzsche himself was basically driven mad and constructed his own philosophy in response to reading Schopenhauer
>>84684224He's not popular because he was considered a pessimist. People generally choose philosophy based on what they consider to be beneficial to themselves. Nietzsche is popular because it is incredibly egocentric and flexible enough to justify whatever you want.
