Does anyone else think this is actually good? Like idea that we eat animals and make them suffer so we can feel good is so evil that it makes me think that is why humanity is so cruel.
We should just eat vegans imo, they are all entirely plant based so its ethical, plus all that co2 released from constantly yapping is bad for the climate 2bdesu
>>84729077Want to REALLY save the planet? Sterilize africa and india.
>>84729077Want to REALLY save the planet? Nuke africa and india and the middle east.
>>84729077If we didn't eat animals there would be a lot less animals, they serve no purpose
>>84729077Humans are omnivores, meat is a part of our diet, simple as. I think it's valid to have concerns about the abhorrent treatment of wild and farm animals, but trying to fight biology won't work and isn't productive. This is a bioweapon created by the elite (jews). People who actually care about the environment know that the real problems come from deforestation, pollution of the sea and wilds, whaling/overhunting, government waste and third world shitholes with no regulation. The "scientists" making these claims are Ivy League educated elites that would never dream of dropping the steak and lobster from their diet. They're the consumers of endangered species, responsible for unsustainable and inhumane practices like whaling and shark finning, and are only interested in power.
Wouldn't it be more good to put poison in the water or spread smallpox? If the point is being evil ticks are only about 90% of the way there. Israel is a good example, they frequently attack unarmed children at scale with white phosphorus, that's both extremely painful and extremely lethal.
>>84729077Deranged fantasy of limp wristed cuckholds servicing properties on mortgage.
>>84729077I eat meat but I think it would be ethical so I would agree with the release of the virus. Because meat factories are essentially torture chambers for millions of living beings so it makes sense to stop it at all costs.
>>84729077It's just red meatSo pork and beefYou can still eat birds and anything that lives in the water, but you can't post epic manly bacon and burger pics to your scowling mirror sunglasses pfp X dot com account anymore
>>84729736>>84729830OP replying to xer own post award
>>84729850Im >>84729736 but obviously it's a complex situation as >>84729456 points out. For one thing I don't know if we can sustainably have people live on a vegan diet because it takes too much effort and most people can't plan their meals and track how much protein they're getting, and they aren't smart enough to consistently take say b12 supplementation. I don't even know if veganism is even theoretically a viable diet. So while I was being confident in saying I would, the reality is I was somewhat baiting and the topic is more complicated. But at face value if you assume people can get a good enough nutrition without meat then I say go for it.
>>84729077>humans are so le hecking cruel>to the point of putting way more work into their diet just to not eat other animals and also thinking it's a good idea to forcedly make all humans allergic to meatyeah looks like humans are very cruel, to other humans
The holocaust was extremely bad because there were more jews in the world after it supposedly happened than before.
>>84729077Anyone that thinks this is good is unironically evil.
>>84729889>But at face value if you assume people can get a good enough nutrition without meat then I say go for it.Nah its still evil. Intentionally realeasing a biological weapon to change free will of humans is evil. You're playing god. You could equally apply this to any number of human "sins" but meat is the most mundane sin. You could engineer diseases that make people gay so they stop over populating the planet. You could make them docile so they never act violently towards any authority figure ect ect. Its just wrong. Humanity evolved in the environment it evolved in, attempting to change this evolution is objectively evil. We are still evolving, things you may consider evil could be an extremely important aspect of our survival mechanism.
>>84729077Society needs strong worker men. If you remove protein from their diet, workers can't be strong enough to maintain your physical infrastructure.And with no fighting men to defend the first world, the middle east and/or china will invade and take over and then the meat consumption and animal mistreatment will skyrocket.Vegans belong in the asylum. Or pig feed.
>>84729077Apparently the bullying wasn't severe enough.
>>84729365Ya, what are you, selfish? How dare you cling on to life when you can sacrifice everything and save both predator and prey?
>>84729077>Blue checkmarkI don't care
>>84729077Guarantee those soientists are also pro choice>killing animals for food is unethical>killing babies for lazy whores is ethical>my body my choice except for this deadly allergy I want to spread with ticks so you're forced to change your diet
>>84729365retarded boomers really post shit like this on facebook thinking they just owned everybody lmao
>The Food Chain bad, but only when you're part of it.
>>84729077We should invent a tick who would make people gay and use it in the majority of the male population, so the few heteros that remain have harems of girls...
>>84729383>>84729395>t. Indonesian Muslim monkey
We should invent a disease that kills all of the small birds. That way there is less grain lost to pests, resulting in much bigger harvests.
>Does anyone else think this is actually good?Fuck that shit. I'd rather die than be forced to be a veggie.
>>84731184That disease (Alpha Gal Syndrome) only makes you allergic to beef. You can still eat chicken, pork, fish and shellfish.
>>84729077When are you going to tell other animals to stop eating each other?
>makes me allergic to dinosaur nuggies>I continue to eat it anywayyou can't take away my comfort food sorry
>>84730060Assuming they actually did that shit, there would not be any actual threat from thirdies because this virus spreads through ticks and ticks don't care about race. Just spray turdies from the helicopter.
damn scientists thought this up intelligent normalfags
>>84729077Its also morally justified to eat these scientists. You can't be allergic to human flesh. And they are first on the menu.
>>84729736So are you going to volunteer to replace the live stock. Because I am hungry for flesh, and its going to come from somewhere.
>>84729077Alpha-gal syndrome doesn't effect your ability to eat birds and fish. This would just increase the demand for Ostrich meat, which is fine for me since I really liked the taste of it.
>>84731285chicken isn't effected, so you're safe
>>84729383Most wisest post itt
I evolved to eat animal products. I even say that as a woman I need red meat more than men do because of my cycle. Maybe only we should be allowed to have it
>>84729077How about ticks making indians, blacks and Jews infertile? Is this morally justifiable?
>plants are OK to eat because dumb people can't anthropomorphize them as easily as some animals>instead of realizing the suffering inherent in our nature and advocating for more ethical and sustainable standards>we'll totally save the planet if everyone has to struggle and eat very specifically to get all their protein and vitamins!>no I won't ever bring up problems inherent in the supply chain that poison our biosphere, I'm single issue on animal cruelty!I hate vegans so fucking much.
>>84729077I eat meat and I'd release the virus too. If for no other reason than that it creates unprecedented seething among the most annoying cocksuckers on the planet, steakfags.
>>84729077we should genetically engineer animals only capable of feeling positive emotins like pleasure and then spend all of our ressources to clone as many as possible to maximise the amount of well being in the world.
The way humanity treats animals is wrong, and obviously so. The excuses we use are framed around survival, but we kill and torture for pleasure. We ritually mock vegetarians to express solidarity with the community's shared approval of the bloodshed, and at every level we divorce ourselves psychologically from the truth of our actions. We place happy , smiling cartoon cows and chickens on the packaging for their shredded corpses, and linguistically we find ways not to call flesh what it is. We lash out more viciously at the people who bring up the topic than we do at any animal cruelty. We spiritualize it, every godless hippy stoned off her dab pen and a yerba mate transforming suddenly into a noble savage from the Plains Indians to "thank the animal" when she digs into a Dave's Single. Those same noble savages had hsppy myths about how the passenger pigeons-now extinct- were willingly giving themselves to people as food. We act like we know we're doing something wrong, because we are, and we do.That said, using ticks as a vector to spread what is obviously a bioengineered disease is wrong on its face. This is the kind of extremist solution that a child who's thought about the issue for 5 seconds comes up with. This is Lisa Simpson morality. You have no idea what kind of awful consequences this could have, ticks are motherfuckers and should be eradicated and you're a traitor to the species if you ally with them, and partnering up with disease *definitely* makes you a traitor to humanity. No, it's not a "good idea." It's a childish and stupid one and it should alarm you that people so powerful have such a mindset.
>>84729077if you think that's bad, that's just one among hundreds of thousands of observable examples of this universe being absolutely wicked in every way imaginable and unimaginable. this universe is the maximally worst hell to exist, and we're stuck living in it forever. there is nothing more cruel than that which is above any and all concept of cruelty: matter.
>>84732912Factory farms are very obviously loosh farms designed to torture and murder living things while concurrently tricking consumers into poisoning themselves and making themselves ritually impure from the standpoint of their own cruel masters. Their very existence provides a vehicle for the daily mass-processing of souls in billions that should terrify anyone who even entertains reincarnation as a possibility.
>>84729077No, this is clearly highly unethical. There is nothing wrong with eating meat. There is plenty wrong with deliberately infecting people with disease.
>>84732958reincarnation is a loaded term. "consciousness emerged once, it shall emerge again" does not imply anything about souls and does not warrant any ineffective spiritual coping mechanisms. consciousness emerges perpetually merely out of happenstance. consciousness is a fundamental of the universe out of happenstance. consciousnesses are forced to undergo eternal torture out of happenstance. if you think billions are bad, think of the hundred of trillions that came before this universe and the hundreds of trillions that will follow. the hundred of trillions of agonizing awareness that you will have no means of escaping from. even if we achieve immortality and automutagenesis, the end of this universe will have all our efforts be in vain. there is no way to describe the utter hopelessness.
>>84732964You yourself are being farmed. The "elites" view you like cattle much in the same way as we view animals. They see nothing wrong with solutions like this, or putting birth control in the mosquitoes, or making everyone get an injection, or drugging the water supply, or just poisoning everyone. It's like culling animals that are a pest have become corrupt somehow or multiplied out of control.They also probably think you've karmically signed off on being treated this way somehow by co-signing treating other species similarly. They like to do shit like that and pretend that they didn't trick you.In any case, listen to the people who are obviously behind this. The Bill Gates and Greta and Klaus Schwab types. They really do regard you as something to be managed. They don't see themselves as your fellows. They sit above you. And you see, you're eating too many hamburgers, so they've decided- on your behalf -to cut your allowance of them. And if you won't play ball, they'll just poison you for it, the same way that the state was happy to poison the booze when they wanted to ban that, or that you'd make your dog's paws bitter with that spray to get them to stop licking them. You really need to understand the contempt with which they regard you for solutions like this to make sense.
>>84729077at the end of the day we have to eat them for our health. and I'm against factory farming so I buy meat locally from animals that lived good lives until they were given a quick unsuspecting death. It's the moral way to do it.
>>84729383whites, poos and chinks do far more damage to the planet than africans
>>84733054China is outright stripping the oceans of life with a militarized fishing fleet that parks itself illegally off the coast of other sovereign nations. You get shit for not reusing bags at the grocery store, and Japan gets shitbfor the whaling and their own overfishing, but the single biggest thing anyone could do to save the oceans would be to sink every Chinese vessel on earth. It would unironically be a game-changer.
>>84730091That's cannibalism and they probably have stds and other mutated illnesses
>>84729830It's funny how a lot of meat consumption these days is done out of masculine posturingFor some it's on the level of tactical office gear, soap that smells like whiskey, dude wipes
