>foids invent the concept of a male loneliness epidemic when what's happening is that DEI programs and wokeness have killed off the careers of an entire generation of men>they then say men deserve the male lonelinesss epidemic and men should stop talking about ithuh?
>>84741367And they say this while destroying everything our people have built and see it as a good thing and a point of pride.
>>84741383>our peopleyou ain't a middle class man, boy
>>84741367Hitler save us
>>84741367thats a funny way of saying billionaires hoarding wealth. and opportunity and feminism making it so women can work enough and dont need men
>>84741435They are hoarding the money while giving it to you. That makes perfect sense kek
any dork who thinks they cant get a job because a black woman got a job is recognizing the results of the problems and missing the actual source of the problem
>>84741435Not how economy works
>>84741443giving it to you on pennies on pennies on the dollar.since the 80s wages of stagnated while the "country" (read: 5 men) is richer than ever.its hoarding bro. a paycheck doesnt mean shit. if they could legally pay you less they would.
>>84741453Not him but how on earth did they do it? By giving women more power. Women are the perfect slave class
>>84741449its economy 101 maybe 102.low liquidity in wealth leads to poorer economic results.if it wasnt hoarded there would be more efficient spending and more opportunity for the average human on earth.wealth inequality is worse than the gilded age, its worse than when we had oil and rail robber barons.
>>84741463america pulled it off with reagan with deregulation and underpaying women, blacks, and illegal immigrants. it accelerated in 2008 with further economic restructuring prioritizing wealth over citizens.
>>84741463>Not him but how on earth did they do it?Money printing.
>>84741470Illegal immigrants aren't citizens for one
>>84741444>missing the actual source of the problemOpen border migration? Remember when teenagers delivered your pizza instead of a 40 year old indian man? How are men supposed to get their foot in the door in employment? All these boys have massive gaps in their resumes because of this shit.Of course it is very easy for a teenage girl to find "employment", if not due to DEI then because of onlyfans.>heh, 17 year old white boy can't compete with ranjeshRanjesh wipes his ass with his bare hands then eats part of the food he delivers and tries to molest any women and girls he delivers too. He is an h1b visa too so they pay him less than minimum wage while it is literally illegal to pay said white boy the same wage even though he might be willing to do so.>it is the brutal world of natural selection and hypercapitalism, cope with it buddyYet you don't have to endure this brutality, you get DEI, you get to play the victim, only white men are subject to it while you whine and complain and get your government money.There is an actual plot to curb stomp white men into the dirt. Most leftists say verbatim state want payback for colonialism and slavery and don't give a shit white boys, they can use their "white privilege". It has been going on for 10 years.
>>84741470Wrong, wrong and wrong againIt's money printing.
>>84741367Honestly stopped giving a shit about it. Yeah, I'm lonely. So what? Has been that way throughout most if not all my life. So long as I can still enjoy life my own way it's fine and no one can take that from me.>inb4 copeYeah, I guess so but it's better than suffering and crying about it. Doesn't help anyone, especially if you're a man.>>84741423Kek.
>>84741511Yeah and why did people agree to this bullshit(men included) in the first place? Feminism pushed by the kikes
>>84741435>billionaires passed title Xdemonrats did you utter spacker
>>84741470elaboratingafter the gilded age, the american government centralized its economy for war while also combatimg the effects of the great depression with successful social welfare laws and programs. this is where we got the minimum wage, social security, insured savings, the beginning of social healthcare, investment in infrastructure, regulations on business, tax benefits for americans, and strengthening of the unions.this is why our grandparents had it so great. wealth was much more equal and controlled - the government correctly recognized a more centralized and controlled economy was more efficient and beneficial for its citizens.after the stagflation of the 70s however, reagan won on economic policy. while he did spur economic activity, it came at the cost of "efficiency," which meant gutting social programs, tax breaks for companies, deregulation, and privatization. with destabilized public infrastructure and programs, they used this as an excuse to gut it even more. clinton and the bushes put the nail in the coffin repeating this patterns.>>84741503still cheapening economic value. scabs.>>84741505>boys>wageagain, scabs, the hoarding of wealth, and the destructuction of the social safety net in favor of profit.>dei>you get to play victimim a white man like you dude. im college educated meant to work in the hospital but i havent been able to get a job and work at dominos. this isnt because of "DEI," this is because hospitals work skeleton crews while charging the spines out of americans. why? capitalism.off topic>molesting girlswhite men are still the greatest risk to white women in terms of sexual violence. most sexual violence comes from someone they know, a family member or romantic partner.>>84741511happened to get worse right around reagan was elected. no, its definitely money printing.
>>84741519Thing is people weren't asked and didn't really have opportunity to agree (vote) on that.Financial system is extremely complex and obscure to average Joe so Joes didn't have strong opinion on that and changes were done by behind backs of the people without these people recognizing what is happening.
>>84741556It's not Reagan how created FDR and later abolished gold standard.Your opinion is invalid/
>>84741562>muh gold standardyour own graph barely deviates from.the value of gold until stagflation and the post reagan era. this is your own statistic.
>>84741403I would be if not for the current state of the world. In dead America, working my ass off since my teens would have paid off. But my tax money is reserved to support Lil Niggy'$ tenth baby mama.
>>84741574>your own graph barely deviates from.the value of goldUntil abolishment of the gold standard in 1971
>>84741574and, again, adjusted for inflation, the average american doesnt earn any more than they did 40 years ago. the economy left us behind while funneling everything to the rich.
>>84741584>the economy left us behind while funneling everything to the rich.And mechanism of that is money printing, rich print money via credit and give it to each other.
>>84741557They recognized it plenty enough for a century before but then all of a sudden they were too stupid? Interesting
>>84741580most tax dollars go to poor red states filled with mostly white people, social security, medicare, and the military. >>84741592credit is part of the problem but even during the gold standard we had periods of massive wealth inequality, as bad or worse than we have now.the gold standard alone wouldnt save us. historically the problems of wealth inequality were only solved with a more centralized economy.
>>84741609>the gold standard alone wouldnt save us.
>>84741609>most tax dollars go to poor red states filled with mostly white people, social security, medicare, and the military.That's what I said, niggers. Clean the gunk out of your eyes.
>>84741638does the gold standard magically redistribute the dollars already held? no. does credit still exist in a gold standard world? yes. does the gold standard put value back into the hands of americans? not really. even if returning to a gold standard was feasible and "easy," there are still structural problems that oppress us today.>>84741649i dont understand why you think its the single mothers receiving maybe $1000-$3000 a year in benefits like mine (eventually stopped) getting while billionaires and companies get away with not paying their 40-50% like the rest of us.
>>84741682I don't understand what you're saying. One nigger is better than the other? Please elaborate and take it very seriously, I need you to explain this to me because I don't get it and I'm not messing with you.
>>84741697im saying that the country isn't losing money because of social welfare programs, and that you aren't doing poorly because of them. SNAP, Medicaid, WIC, Section 8, etc, make up for a very small part of federal and state spending. >>84741580your reply here suggests to me that you think that these programs are the reason why you arent succeeding like your ancestors did. because you aren't receiving these benefits.the second part of my argument is that, if the ultra-wealthy paid their fair share (at least as much % as you pay based on youd wealth,) that not only would you be able to benefit from these programs because of the extra tax income, you would thrive.the problem isnt public services. public services serve the public. the problem is the hoarding of wealth by the very few.10 americans own more money than the bottom 60% of americams combined. almost every single american in that 60% cannot afford a $500 emergency. its not the people struggling and working like you keeping you from thriving.
>>84741737thanks for typing all that out, I'll surely read and respond to it later because I care.
also thank you for saying the shit everyone already knows and acting like you're inventing the wheelmy entire response should have just been, "no shit you fucking retard."
>>84741916then why are you still blaming poor people retard
>>84741929kek you are dense as a brick of shit aren't you? i was joking.
