why does nobody understand this basic principle?
>>84741709I don't know. Why do you spam wieners all day long? Why are robots like this? Robots, can you explain? Why do all robots do this?
>why does nobody understand this basic principle?also, kek, the ironysaying nobody gets it while you get it and someone first had to have come up with it
>>84741709Maybe because what you're saying sounds like characteristic generics rather than majority genericsor maybe they're going for some sort of inductive case based on their own experienceor maybe the person you're talking with is dumb
>>84741782Or maybe it's bait and they know it's dumb. Maybe that's why they post it.
>>84741709Proficiency in this concept should be required for 1st world citizenship.
>>84741709the problem is you retards always complain about le heckin naxalt when the reality is nothing like this graph and you are just talking about some <5% of a population and trying to act like they are the majority.
>>84741709Partly because most people are just dumb, and partly because critical thinking, logic, and statistical reasoning are not emphasized in school.
>>84741709I think it takes much higher than average IQ to mentally handle aggregation well (especially multi-layer aggregation)
>>84741709But isn't the inverse possible as well? That pointing to the 5% does not indicate the absence of the average?
>>84743680Worded poorly. I meant that this could apply to any broad generalization regardless of NAXALT or AXALT.
