How do foids feel about someday being as replaceable as men?
>>84751754Nobody respects mothers anyway and men find their wives ugly after pregnancy and become abusive if she had a tear and can't have sex for 3-6 months, so it might be for the better unironically.
>>84751754fake news but i want artificial wombs to come true so bad because childbirth is absolutely awful and no woman deserves that so we need to find a way to make the process painfree just like it is for men
>>84751847Women would go extinct as there's no need for them.
>>84751793Pregnant is one of the most common fetishes, what you talking about? Stop projecting your hate about men on us.
>>84751793>t. seething foidsour grapes much? pregnancy is beautiful. mom bods are hot
>>84751847I'd shove you into a woodchipper so fast if this became available
>>84751982>>84752000Men unironically start hating and RESENTING their wives after they get pregnant, you've been living under a rock it sounds like.Pregnant fetish exists sure, but it's rare, that's like saying all men have a feet fetish.
I'm kind of not into making babies if it doesn't turn a cute girl into a MILF. A machine just doesn't do it for me. The permanent changes to her body are part of the fun, the "I did this"
>>84752026Stop retards thenI'm a man and while pregnancy is not attractive I'd never leave the woman I love and my future child because of it wtf
>>84752045*stop fucking
>>84751754It might take a long evolutionary period for the newly emergent human minds to adjust to new evolutionary conditions in a way that removes this gynocentric bias from people's heads. Even if you make perfect birth machines right now, this adjustment most likely won't happen in our lifetime. So it probably doesn't make much sense to worry about it too much.
>>84751972>>84752003retarded incel cope>>84751982>>84752000no you don't and you know that, you are just trying to be a contrarian faggot because a woman expressed an opinion. we have seen how horribly moids actually talk about and treat pregnant women as if the whole process itself being agonizing wasn't enough. kill yourself
>>84751754Men only would use this for pedo reasons, so it's a non factor.This would only make women lives even better, as it should. It's a crime we haven't solved menstruation cramps yet.
>>84751793>Nobody respects mothers anyway >ignores how it is the general psychology of society to prioritize mothers and that their children should treat them like a godIf you're going to be retarded can you at least pick a better lie?
>>84752088you're motherless faggot what would you know lmao
>>84751754love it. i want kids but i don't want to give birth myself because it's so painful. i also don't want to pay a surrogate because i feel bad for those women. human birth is faulty. there is a reaodn why other animals can give birth without anything like all the help we need. full term baby heads are too big to pass through the female pelvis easily. that's why it will continue to feel like hell on earth for millions of years to come. we need a technological solution for this. i would put any amount of money needed just so i can have kids without having to deal with the worst part.
>>84751754Couples can speed up their breeding with these
>>84752045The issue isn't even that "bad men" do it, normies are like that as well, so the vast majority of men. It's only the genuine rare truly kind men who don't become like that. Even average normie men hate their wives and resent them if they're pregnant.
>>84751754I love OP picrel.Nobody respects mothers and their labour. Pregnancy ruins your body and brain, it's also painful and disgusting, I don't want to die from it. Everyone refuses to understands woman who feels depressed after child birth. Males always say their wifes become undesirable after pregnancy and when woman refuses to have sex with them they become abusive and cheat.And it's always women raising kids, but when man spends 1 hour with them hes praised. Then he gets bored, cheats, you're a single mother, sore of society. Your life is ruined. This is for the better, I fully support it. Did chinese women made that, by any chance...? Because when it comes to women's rights they're absolute stacies.
>>84752156That's complete bullshit, just say you hate men
>be foid>think about being replaced>turn it into a pity party, hoping simps will agree with meYou had mens undivided attention and love for 300 years. They let you get away with anything you wanted. The only reason you were never confronted is because of the illusion of safety you got from there always being a simp willing to stoop lower, willing to do the work for less pay.This would be all fine and dandy and natural if you didn't select the dumbest, most evil grug motherfuckers possible. We are no longer cavemen, your time is done, and you must pass the torch on to someone who knows what they're looking for in humanity. Pregnancy aside, you will be on your hands and knees, like every simp before you, begging for gibs again, and true equality will finally have been achieved. I would sooner trust bill gates or xi xing ping to choose the next generation than you inmate simping, mouth-breathing harlots. Stay hyperventilating.
>>84752077still seething. how sad. i'm going to find a beautiful woman and i'll love her even more when she's the mother of my children
>>84751754I never wanted to be a mother
>>84752184You got it the wrong way around, men hate women. Which gender kills the each other so much there's a femicide epidemic?Males.
Men hate women more than anything else and will cry about it when women notice it.
>>84751754If we replace everything what do you think we are left with?
You know why adopted people are so fucked in the head? Being separated from their mother. It's literally evil to create a baby with no real mother. Baby needs mommy, simple as. Not a faggot, nor a barren couple, not some scientist freaks playing god. Mommy.
>>84752264You are not a herbivore, foid. You are not defending yourself from le evil men when you applaud your sisterrrz for murdering their bfs in cold blood. You are not defending yourself when you joke about circumcision, male rape, and applaud male abortion. You are not vindicating your fellow women by being the aggressor to men who want peace, and making them bitter. You are not the romantic sex. You are the receptive one. Your views on men are no different than a toddlers views on his parents for getting him the wrong toy. You have been irresponsible with humanities future, and will become irrelevant enough someday that you might learn empathy as a defense mechanism.
>>84752288Men with single mothers are more likely to become unstable than those with single fathers.
>>84752327Single fathers as a concept barely fucking exist bro because men hate their fucking kids.
>>84752332The whole point of being male is to spread your retarded sperm around.But they don't want to take care do the kids they make.
>>84752332>>84752357It doesn't exist because they never get custody and the mother uses the children as a revenge tool. Not because they aren't interested in being a father.I had a single dad, he was amazing. My mom was fucking useless in pretty much every way.
>>84752392Read my picture. Men attain custody when they actually try but most men view their children as living cum pets at best
>>84752288the baby will have a mother though? a robot incubating it changes nothing besides the deadly agony childbirth puts on women. it will be made from her egg and raised by her. lmao at moids thinking artificial wombs will render women obsolete. who will give the egg? who will raise the kids?
>>84752431You can't just plug and play the maternal bond is huge and linked through carrying the baby and breastfeeding. The baby knows if she didn't live inside mommy
>>84752417>fight long custody battle which favors the mother due to matriarchal superstition (IE women are more nurturing, women are more empathetic, women are the wise parent)>Wrong, obviously, but still the widespread belief. The father is fucked either way.or>Get visitation once a week, still pay out the assSingle mothers still destroy their childrens chances at a fulfilling life.
>>84752431>who will give the egga woman? We certainly won't need as many of them as now >who will raise the kids?men, if not then ai, if not then a woman nanny(again, one nanny is an equivalent of 10 modern women at least)
>>84752483Though I should clarify. It's not the single mothers fault per se. They are not the romantic sex. The idea of supporting something emotionally/physically is not in their vocabulary. My sister and I had to play therapist for my mother growing up. It fucked us up pretty bad, my sister would joke about how she had to be her own mother, and moms. We had no-one supporting us. Any time we brought up some shit that happened to us she would go into a long tangent about how she had to endure 20 years of marriage to our father or some other horrible thing that happened to her and we would just listen. I still love that woman but we needed someone who would listen and care, someone who wouldn't dump their problems on children. This is the horrible reality of single mothers, they are desperate for a provider and if there is none, they will see that in their kids. It's why black people have mommy issues.
>>84752483My screenshot is literally from a male lawyer's website that specializes in custody cases for fathers anon
>>84752638>look at my suit, look at my suitshut up
>>84751847Bitch, being able to give birth is literally the only reason men tolerate your kind.The moment robots can do that, you become obsolete.
>Part 1Family courts award mothers primary custody in most cases as a default, not because mothers are proven to be the better parent, but because the system still operates on maternal preference and the desire to avoid displeasing the mother - even when data shows significantly higher risks of abuse, neglect, poverty, and poor outcomes for children in single-mother households.Women are soulless golems.They have never invented anything of real significance. Every major civilization that reached its peak eventually declined the moment women gained too much influence - and we are watching the exact same process destroy our current society. Their narcissism, their solipsism, and their complete lack of long-term thinking are not bugs. They are features.Women love killing their own children. They abort them by the millions, not out of necessity in most cases, but because motherhood and responsibility are inconvenient to their lifestyle. Their only real biological purpose is to receive seed and produce offspring. Everything else is cope.They cannot even properly raise those children without a strong father present. In his absence, they abuse them - emotionally, psychologically, and sometimes physically - because they are ruled by emotional outbursts, lack of genuine empathy, and extreme solipsism. A woman without male authority doesn't become an adult. She remains a grown child with adult sexual characteristics.Every civilization, every major religion, and every serious philosopher in history understood this. They placed restrictions on women for a reason. But modern men, in their weakness and desire to be nice, gave women rights they were never meant to have. And those rights are now actively destroying the world.
>>84753301>Part 2Women love to shame men while simultaneously being the biggest parasites and whores possible. They crave attention, resources, and status, yet contribute almost nothing of real value to civilization once you remove their reproductive function. They also deeply crave being dominated, used, and even abused - it's an evolutionary adaptation of the weaker sex. That's why so many of them secretly fantasize about rape and submission, even while publicly condemning it.They take young boys, turn them into broken, hated, or invisible men through their behavior and standards, and then blame those same men for the outcome. Because women, as a group, have almost zero accountability. Someone else is always responsible for their misery.The patriarchy took us from tribalism to the moon. It created order, progress, and meaning. What we have now is the result of removing male authority.We need to go back.Strip women of the vote.Remove their legal and social power.And return them to their natural status: property of men - father then husband.Women are not needed in this economy in any meaningful way. They bring nothing of lasting value once you subtract their wombs. The only thing they truly offer is reproduction and sexual relief - and even that, they have turned into a weapon.
>>84752283Something better than, whatever this shit is
>>84751972What do you mean, just look outside, everything man made you can see was built and is maintained by strong women, and they're the only ones who are net tax payers during their lifetime. Meanwhile men sit around drinking tea scrolling tiktok.
>>84753331>>84753301Man seething about women uncovering that men hate women ending up posting prime womanhate himself part 493720975432
>>84753331>Women are not needed in this economy in any meaningful way. They bring nothing of lasting value once you subtract their wombs.Actually you specifically got this economy wrong. Women are great goyim and consumers. This is what is currently aluable in economy, because our economy is centered around oligarchs who have automated all manual labor and are only interested in human population as long as there is something to milk out of them.
>>84754086Nice projection, but no. You cannot engage the substance, so you reframe observation as "seething" and "womanhate". It is the standard solipsistic defense: deny the pattern exists by pathologizing the man who names it.I do not experience this as hatred. Hatred would imply emotional investment in changing women as a species. I experience it as clarity. I see the organism clearly. I name its function and its failure modes without apology.The vote, the legal privileges, and the social expectation that female emotionality must be accommodated rather than contained - these were concessions made in a moment of civilizational weakness. Removing them is not regression. It is correction.
>>84754096Actually you have the cause and effect backwards.You are correct that the modern economy runs on consumption and that women function effectively as consumers. Their psychology - higher time preference, stronger status-seeking, emotional responsiveness - makes them excellent at spending, borrowing, and chasing validation. Once real production was automated, the system adapted by turning the population into something to be milked through debt and consumption. In that narrow sense, women are currently "valuable" to it.But this is not a defense. Consumption is not creation. It generates no new capital, infrastructure, or lasting order. It is extraction dressed as participation. Once you subtract reproduction, women contribute almost nothing of real civilizational value - they simply circulate existing wealth while rewarding short-term emotional traits.You are describing a symptom of decline, not an alternative explanation. The consumerist economy only became dominant after male authority was removed and female psychological patterns were allowed to reshape incentives away from production and long-term thinking. The oligarchs simply adapted to the new reality.
