It's not the same. Stop, just stop. COOL IT! Don't fucking go there.
>>84758390>shaming sex workershow bigoted of her >:(
>>84758390But I either read hentai or ERP with Claude on Silly Tavern. I consider that porn.
>>84758390Little girls get EPI'd by fanfiction, A03, wattpad, etcLike a lot of EPI victims, they have nostalgia for and will defend the way they were EPI'd. These "romance" books are an abstract symbol for what was essentially their first and prevailing relationship.
>>84758390Smut is porn and arguably worse than porn because porn is typically very simple and has very simplistic roles for all participants. Attractive people having sex. Smut for women has deranged and borderline dangerous themes of abuse, rape, torture, bestiality, murder, et cetera. These books are never just:>Jenny has sex with her unrequited handsome childhood friend/stepbrother/soccer coach BillyThey are like:>Jenny gets kidnapped and raped hourly by her serial killer stalker billionaire rapist cannibal who uses her blood as lube while threatening to rape and kill her sisters if she tries to escape (he loves her)For what it is worth, I think all porn is damaging and unhealthy outside of tasteful private erotica, but I am also a MASSIVE prude by modern standards.
>>84758433these people have no idea what the fuck they're doing anymore, 3dpd mental illness
>>84758390she basically said 3d is cringe and honestly that's kind of based.
>>84758390So she's fine with CGI porn, yeah?
>>84758390Porn is worse for the performers, but smut literature is worse for the readers. Detailed stories have much more power to shape one's worldview and expectations than a few minutes of stimulating imagery.
>>84758390>who may well be underagethey people really believe this bullshit? there is about 0.01% chance you'll encounter cp on porn sites
>>84758478she's got that emptying the vacuum cleaner type bush
>>84758478probably not because she'll find a way to say you're harming women by jerking off to fictional ones. she just hates men and anything they do.
>>84758483No. The only victims of porn and anything else are men. Women are not and can not be victims. All of this is their fault.
>>84758490Well, sometimes they make the video when she is 17 and release it later when she's 18 and she signs the consent when she hits 18 and nobody will know from the video.
>>84758390What if the porn actress is just a woman doing her job? Are we gonna call her a "victim" for no reason?
And who is Monica? Is she an incel??
>>84758513No that's my whole point, these stories give women extremely unrealistic notions of what their relationships should look like, which primarily harms men.
>>84758598ok? 17 is legal in most states and countries. Plus I doubt porn film makers purposefully delay videos as a 'loophole' when they can just film them later anyway its not like she'll age like milk in a year at that age. People just saying random shit so they can feel like they have moral superiority.
>>84758631I don't know where it's legal to make porn at 17, but whatever the limit is, they can always record it a few years before that and release later.
>>84758390>It's not the sameI would say it's arguably worse
women would get the same exact ick from a guy erping with a spicy chatbot AI
>>84758390I have no idea what these are and i don't think i ever read something that was specifically "for women only", but i'm sorry, that is an anthropomorphic muscular bull / cow dude lovingly hugging a woman and it's called "milking farm". How is that not porn?
>>84758817no cause women do that shit even more than guys do
>>84758390>women who could get normal jobs and function in society decide to be in porn insteadummmmm this is men's fault actually
>>84758478>>84758508That's even WORSE! Sexbots and animated porn cut the human out of the equation while still epitomizing capitalist patriarchy!
mayli was a trafficked victim of the patriarchy :(
>>84758390>Imagine sexy thingsBut you know she'd ban and imprison a guy who uses AI for CP r like a rape scenario, for example. Western roastoids have regularly screeched about it regarding loli hentai shit in Japan, where they have no power
but women already bitch about attractive women in video games, and those women are completely fake.
>>84758962While never once asking for the male characters to be made fugly. Men have to live up to impossible standards too.
>>84758989Yeah, men need to train everyday and have a careful expensive protein rich diet to be jacked and it's over if they're too short. Women just need to put down the fork and maybe use a little face paint.
>>84758390Daily reminder that feminists are evil incarnate
>>84758460>EPIwhat does this mean
i'm a moid who has enjoyed erotic fiction. hell, AS an underage teenager, i enjoyed (pre-Twilight) YA romance when the middle-aged authoress added a saucy scene between the two 17.9-year-old characters (almost like it's hot and a normal part of being a teenager, or something).the OLD feminist approach (not crazy feminazis) would be to suggest men and women both have sex drives and women shouldn't be shamed for it. in fact, every fucking article on vibrator recommendations still starts with this whole preamble about how female masturbation is 'a huge taboo', as if articles about male sex toys are common.it was fine 20 years ago. we got it. now, we've regressed as a society.
>>84760119Early porn introduction The equivalent of getting mentally molested
>>84758835Nooo, nooooooo! Men CANNOT be allowed to cum inside animate objects resembling women - this will devalue women's pussies and THEIR power! Men must ONLY be allowed to splooge inside real pussies in exchange for money and attention!
>may 22>pragmata isn't an original sin
>>84758390if drawings of lolis is porn then yes, your rape novels are also porn.
>>84758390>victims of rapeLet me guess, she never blocks rapists
