childless men tax is coming.you will work to support the system where chad impregnates many women and the women raise the child on their own.work and die.
>>84777927Is that a snippet from the paper Cambridge published?I truly loved that paper, I love how grim the data presented is, how bleak the accelerationist solutions proposed were.I just wonder why it's not talked about more.
I will work less than I work now actually
>>84777927What the authors ignore about viewing human mating from the evolutionary perspective is that for women mating has never been about a conscious attempt at "freeing" themselves. It's a lower level process based on attraction, not a high level conscious calculation. Women are hypergamous, meaning they are attracted to men on the same or higher level of socioeconomic status. This doesn't have anything to do with a conscious calculation. A woman who's doing well economically isn't attempting to "free" herself by pining for a man who has higher socioeconomic status than her. To describe it in such terms isn't consistent with established evo psych literature.
>>84777927tax avoidance is a moral obligationdo you suppose they ever think that positive incentives could work better than a cattle prod
>>84777963yes it is.feel free to give us a rundown of the grim shit.
>>84777927Leftoids want to siphon your wealth and isolate you. Rightoids want to keep you in a perpetual state of anger towards minorities and women. I sure do love being a young man in 2026. Everyone is my enemy for the puter screen tells me so.
>>84777927Already paying it here for a while. currently 0.6% of the salary before tax. Still don't want nor need children. Will never want them.
>>84777927>childless men tax is coming.Already is. But they can add more.>chad impregnates many women and the women raise the child on their own.Not gonna happen with current year laws.
>>84777927If the state I live in forces me under threat of violence to finance other people's kids, then that's the sign it's time to move countries. I won't be spending my life living under state-enforced cuckoldry. I believe I have a moral right to dignity.
>>84777927People who have children have significant social capital. If anything they should be paying reparations to neets cause they keep isolating us with their normie social sabotage tactics. They won the competition and just want a victory lap at this point.
>>84778071They already do, you've been doing it this entire time if you pay taxes, they're just going to squeeze you for a little more.
As long as I can have my robot wife and be happy, I'd be okay to pay for humanity to make some more slaves to pay into my seniorbux
>>84778090That might be true, but you don't know what country I live in or what laws exist here. So your assertion is vacuous.
>>84778084They get preferential treatmeant from the owners of this world, because they have create the new generation of braindead drooling slaves.This isn't about your romance bullshit, whatsoever, this is purely financial. The owners of this world know, that children are the investment into the future. Into the means of production. No investment = shrinking, then crisis, then the dead economy in the future. Which is why Elon, for example, is telling everybody to go and make 55 children right fucking nao. As if we don't understand that he is just asking for more slaves to exploit in the future.
Married people with kids have enjoyed tax breaks and gibs since forever. Try applying for food stamps as a single dude with a job
>>84778071you stupid fuck they already have you fucking white motherfuckers are clueless
>>84778114Humans and Money are both goods in the market, in an economy. Look at it from the perspective of a greedy ceo with a gorillion of dollars. Human resources. Nao.
>>84778103This site is comprised of a predominantly American userbase, I always reply with the assumption that anyone I'm speaking to is American unless they explicitly say otherwise or use a measurement that isn't in common usage here.You're from a country that doesn't pay taxes and doesn't have subsidy programs?I find that hard to believe unless you're from the third world.
>>84778052It pisses me off it's this way. Best you can do is make friends with the rightoids and then not hate people, because the right allows for more diversity of thought. The trade off is needing to tolerate jerks.Leftists do not care about you as a human. They mainly want to use your affection for them as a way of having control over you. It's a sad day we live in when it's less dehumanizing to be friends with the people who outright hate minorities and women, because even if you're a minority or a woman, those people won't abandon who they're close to just for dumb shit. They'll be assholes and do lots of terrible nonsense to persuade you to their side, but they won't use the connection you have with them itself against you for their own gains. They, if you're their friend, do not see you as a means for an ends of their cult.I have very leftist beliefs, but I'm considered right wing, because I won't abandon my right wing racist and sexist and transphobic friends and throw them under the bus over political disagreements.Just give love to all, and make lots of friends, because otherwise unless you're entirely alone, you will be exploited. People see your isolation and capasity foe love as a vulnerability to use against you. But they can't if you can survive being abandoned and make friends with all the outcasts or have a family that's means anything.
>>84777927Qi lai! Bu yuan zuo nu li de ren men!Ba wo men de xue rou zhu cheng wo men xin de Changcheng!Zhonghua min zu dao le zui wei xian de shi houMei ge ren bei po zhe fa chu zui hou de hou shengQi lai! Qi lai! Qi lai!Wo men wan zhong yi xinMao zhe di ren de pao huo, qian jin!Mao zhe di ren de pao huo, qian jin!Qian jin! Qian jin! Jin!
what the feminists think of it:https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1t26v16/what_are_your_thoughts_on_this_new_cambridge_paper/interesting takes as always. sadly not too many!
If they ever do this I just won't pay.
>>84778354I truly cannot wrap my head around how these women think, how poorly they view men, how happy they are to see one half of their own species suffer.I know a lot of men are trash, but come on, women willingly choose these men repeatedly.
>>84778354>>84778403>top comment I'm not reading anything other than this, this is the right reaction They will never stop importing browns and HR karens into our corporate and academic institutions though, they have a brainworm
>>84778581>paid enoughby whom? that's the the point. money doesn't fall from the sky. also saying "humans" is a copout when the implication of this statement is "women" since men can't have children on their own (women can)
>>84777927Im 33, single, and make 85k/yearGive me an Aryan 18-21 year old built like a Dallas cheerleader with a max body count of 2 and I will reproduce for Uncle Sam. Im not sticking my dick in some horrendous fat bitch
>childless men tax is coming.Fuck them. I've already taken 20 years of 'bux.
>>84777927>childless men tax is coming.Women are the ones avoiding children to line up to be a side piece.
>>84777927Take HRT to escape your inceldom and become a trans woman.
>>84778581You are looking at total brainwashing. They don't merely disagree, the very act of discussing it is apparently "barf inducing". They literally have a severe emotional reaction in response to rational thought.They are not concerned at all about the implications of abandoning millennia of young couples getting married and raising families and whether they are actually happier like this. To them the bubble they live in is the best of all possible worlds and all its problems are caused by patriarchy, systemic racism, wealthy white nonjewish men, homophobes, transphobes et cetera... by some convoluted means. It is why they will allude to being 1950s tradwives "barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen" whenever they get sexually assaulted by 'jeets, even though in an alternate reality they would be in the happiest period of their life living in a clean white neighborhood with several intelligent healthy cute aryan kids and a self-disciplined white tradhusband who thinks it's his duty to build furniture to help pay off their mortgage, where their daughter will never even have to smell an indian man let along be put through the same experience.Yet, it is not the indians who are "barf inducing", it is us.The irony is all their bullshit hasn't worked. Groups like Amish and Mormons multiply like rabbits, as well as muslims, indians, hispanics and africans of course, who ironically don't care about women's rights at all. They will lose inevitably, but they will manage to do an enormous amount of damage to western civilization before they finally fizzle out.We basically need to break every rule feminists have. Instead of futilely trying to get a date with women our age in the communities who have forever rejected us because the media told them to, we need to look further afield to trad christian women. We need to work hard, but not for bluehairs, for the women worth saving.
>>84778685There should not be unfairness in one's own nation towards it's own inheritors. There should not be laws, bribery, and permission structures that incentivize depriving an inheritor from earning a fair living in his own nation. What's intuitive is that that should actually be punished to disincentivize that.The incentives that formed the basis of western civilization are, and I'm paraphrasing a tweet:>economic stability>family structure>the generational social contract These are all gone now. So you get no more civilization. You just coast on its former momentum and glory (glory means "culture"). The redditor might not be able to articulate this or might even reject the wording of its premises, but it is correct. When some redditor can't articulate himself clearly then you should read between the lines, ask why he's saying something, don't focus on what he's saying. >also saying "humans" is a copout when the implication of this statement is "women" since men can't have children on their own (women can)He might be ideologically motivated to speak untruth, but fundamentally I understand where the source of his complaint comes from.>>84778789>To them the bubble they live in is the best of all possible worldsThey are materialists and that's why they're often having mental breakdowns and are mentally ill. All they have is material reality and they deny any component that actually is the source of and required for the maintenance and the passing on of this material prosperity to future generations. >Groups like Amish and Mormons multiply like rabbits,Indeed when there is no birth control, that's just a natural consequence, even the prudish Anglo had like 7 children per family back in ye olde times. >We basically need to break every rule feminists have.I think they will naturally break under their own pressure themselves, I am actually optimistic about things now that figures like Rupert Lowe are showing up.
>>84777927If incels were correct in their analysis, this.whole.time. Perhaps they are correct in their proposed solutions: e.g. the state should enslave all roasties.>>84778014>same ... level of socioeconomic status.They are attracted to powerful sociopaths, not guys who make the same as them. If every man was bluebeard or the marquis de sade, this wouldn't be a problem.>>84778685The state should mandate that all billionaires take the ElonPill and impregnate thousands of women or be taxed all their billions. Their progeny would be the replacement for the middle class that they helped destroy. That's justice. Destroy your middle class? Uh oh, now YOU have to have a billion kids. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQeezCdF4mk
>>84777927Um genetic diversity much? Enjoy your sterile great grandkids you stupid foids
>>84778052>Rightoids want to keep you in a perpetual state of anger towards minoritiesjust blacks and arabs. ive never ever seen anyone talk bad about asians. and for all the shit people give indians, ive always had polite experiences with them too
>>84777927It will only result in even more men opting out, in the west today only men are net tax payers over their lifetime, everyone else takes out more than they put in
tax me on what exactly?
Grim but this is what normies deserve, they enable this shit for the last 100 years it only gets worse and worse.
>>84777927stop fucking posting this gay retarded ragebait headline you dumb nigger loser.training my herblore
>>84779841>scientific articles are ragebait nowalso we read the abstract.
>>84777927>paying taxesAbsolute state of wagecucks
>>84779708No amount of taxes is going to make a guy reconsider starting a family with that fat ugly bitch and her 3 kids.
>>84777927I am not even heterosexual
>>84779465This, tons of governments will be going broke in the next 5-15 years and with that primarily women will be affected because they have the jobs you can get rid off first plus also many government jobs
I don't have much problem with that. In a way I already do it helping here and there to a relative that has children.
>>84780649At least those children are related to you/somebody you care about, plus you are choosing to help. Presumably they are thankful for the help. That's completely different than being forced to fund Chad's bastard children and Stacey's decision to be a single mom. None of those faggots even know you exist and they don't care about you at all.
>>84777927Dont care, I left the West
>>84778354>interesting takes as alwaysBy interesting you mean fucking retarded?
>>84777927Am I reading this right? These faggots want to create an entire generation of kids raised by single mothers?
this is obviously the dumbest shit ever but yknow what why the hell notlet's just make everything worse who gaf anymore
>>84777927>"Almost all women still want to reproduce."Bullshit. Starting off with a lie that big, the whole paper should be thrown in the garbage.>"... but many struggle to find a good-enough partner."That's because society and social media have badly warped their minds. Focus your solution on the actual source of the problem, you dumbfuck.>"Such policies would likely exacerbate male marginalization"Well, yeah they would, if the policies were idiotic. So how about looking at some policies that aren't idiotic?>new technologies are on the horizonSo you want to solve social problems with technology. When has technology ever solved a social problem?"Women only want to date Chad? Well, we have a new drug (or a new app or whatever) that will definitely solve that problem!!!" If you don't recognize that as just more corporate profit-seeking, then you're a dumbfuck.This paper has an amazing amount of stupidity in just a single paragraph. I knew the academic world was going to shit, but this is a new low. Or maybe the paper was AI-generated, which is now a huge problem for the academic journals.
>>84777963>Is that a snippet from the paper Cambridge published?>I just wonder why it's not talked about more.Because that paper is deeply flawed. Maybe the data is real, but the analysis and "proposed solutions" are fucking stupid.>>84782285These faggots want to create an entire generation of kids raised by single mothers?Notice how a random 4channer was able to spot a deep flaw in two seconds. That's just one of many flaws.
Has any Chad come from a single mother household that didn't burn out and become a fat loser immediately after highschool?
