>>84795398
The time for change is now

>>84795398
How did they screen this and how would it even be known in the first place

>>84795411
Idk but here's link if u wanna research it

https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/2064889314350432468
>>84795408
I mean us incels are all below avg iq since intelligence is associated with looks

>>84795398
>top 0.01% intelligence!!!1!!
>is autist
>is male
>parents' face 10 years down the line when super genius embryo is smearing poop on the wall

>>84795513
Why would genius smear poop?

>>84795398
Geniuses see the world as a bunch of systems not individual things. Its hard to grasp how they think but imagine a computer motherboard, to a genius they process every part of it as a whole system so to them fixing a motherboard is like drawing a circle on paper to us. What crazy is they cant grasp how we dont think like that since its so instinctive to them.

>>84795513
>becomes obsessed with furries and make the best porn of all time
what a time to be alive :)

>>84795532
>genius
>can't understand people are retards

File: hehehe.png (57 KB, 360x343)

57 KB PNG

>>84795398
Not got a clue, I'm in the top 0.5%, not sure what those thickos think.

>>84795553
Geniuses dont know how primitive brains think, its why theres a trope of geniuses being awful teachers to normal IQs as they project their advanced cognition on others. Geniuses can only tutor other geniuses.

File: you irl.jpg (27 KB, 340x306)

27 KB JPG

>>84795398
As someone who lives in the south around rednecks I already feel like I'm in the 1% of intelligence.

>>84795398
Yeah this is retarded I would gladly exchange 20 iq points to remove social anxiety

>>84795573
Stupidity is predictable, the point is idiots are idiots because they deliberately don't want to learn.

File: 1772594311335055.jpg (637 KB, 1170x647)

637 KB JPG

>>84795398
>What would it be like to be in top 1% of intelligence?
It feels pretty damn good to be desu. Like I can coast my way to success in life. I can see solutions and options quickly that other people take a long time to come around to or never get to at all. For most things that aren't incredibly complex, I can teach them well because I can understand the shape of their existing mental image based on how they discuss the ideas involved and can quickly identify and correct fundamental misconceptions.
>Everyone at school, work , home or internet would seem like retard to you
This is somewhat the case on the internet but in school I was in advanced classes pretty much the whole way through secondary education. Still usually the smartest person in the room but not by a massive margin. I work in software engineering at a big tech company so there are plenty of other smart people around. Intelligence is largely genetic, and both my parents were above average. It took me a long time to realize exactly how advantaged I am because of my intelligence.

>>84795585
Idiots are below normal IQ

>>84795655
intelligence is not hereditary
coding is linguistics, a human doesn't need top iq to do it. professional chemists have higher iq requirements, for example.
being smart and being intelligent are two different things. intelligence is a stat. being smart is moreso the way a person acts and behaves in the world.

>>84795398
>What would it be like to be in top 1% of intelligence?
That describes me. Any specific questions?
>Everyone at school, work , home or internet would seem like retard to you
That's definitely been the case, especially here.

>>84795684
Geniuses literally have different neurons from us idiots so its pure genetics

File: astro_2atw_francis_galton(...).png (79 KB, 673x992)

79 KB PNG

>>84795684
>intelligence is not hereditary
It absolutely is hereditary. Pretty much everything is Hereditary. There's a eugenics book written 150 years ago titled 'Hereditary Genius'.

>>84795398
Yes yes, well done genius fetus, well done.

HOWEVER

>later screening reveals child will only grow up to be 5'11 and start balding at 25

Woops! Abortion for you, says the mother!
Her body her choice.

>>84795398
it's a sad, depressing existence. I wouldn't really recommend it at all

>>84795707
it is provably wrong. Look at the parents of Nicola Tesla, Albert Einstein, William Shakespear, and the list goes on, and on, and on.
The opposite is also true. Were intelligence a 100% hereditary stats, not people of average above intelligence levels would ever have children with down syndrome. We (humanity) don't fully understand (decoded) the human genome, nor the brain, because we can't 100% replicate either.

>>84795398
I don't know if it even counts for anything but I was tested at 142 IQ in 5th grade and my life is as plain and average as can be. My advice is to be born attractive and with wealthy parents. Good luck.

>>84795715
nigger, you'd best be trolling. also read this,
>>84795726

>>84795736
>n-word user doesn't engage with facts and substitutes lazy baseless allegations for actual arguments
color me shocked!

>>84795752
>doesn't engage with the point
>resorts to pure ad hom
gratz, nigger. you're stupid.

>>84795726
Geniuses compared to other geniuses is muh hardwork but a genius compared to an idiot is genetics

>>84795411
They assume (probably wrongfully) that they fully understand the nature of intelligence and which genes are correlated with it, so they just look for known culprits' activation.

>>84795763
>he did it again and "no u!"'d
You're unfit to be having this conversation, and I'm done engaging with you.

>>84795684
>intelligence is not hereditary
It absolutely is, though regression to the mean is still a factor.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4002017/
"The latent g factor was highly heritable (86%), and accounted for most, but not all, of the genetic effects in specific cognitive domains and elementary cognitive tests."
>coding is linguistics, a human doesn't need top iq to do it.
Sure, average people can write up a basic website or app or script and get paid $90k/yr for it. Concurrent distributed systems at high scale and complexity are not linguistics, and it does take high IQ to work with them effectively.
>professional chemists have higher iq requirements, for example.
Maybe, but they get paid a lot less than me so in your model those people must be less smart because they're getting paid a fraction of what they could be making in another job that (according to you) requires less intelligence.

>>84795768
development of intelligence is also nurture. a human brain deprived of much needed resources can't develop properly.

>>84795789
Regression to the meme is a copecept for euphemizing one parent's inferiority in a matter.

>>84795726
>Were intelligence a 100% hereditary stats
The problem with midwits is that they don't deal with nuance well. Do you think hair color isn't hereditary because two brown haired people can have a blonde baby?

>>84795812
Have you never taken a class in statistics?

>>84795794
Everything about the human body is like muscles. Muscles grow more with exercise.

>>84795821
I did, and failed it.

When it comes to heredity, if two parents are at a similar baseline at a high level, the offspring is more likely to exceed them both than it is to be at their level or below.

>>84795398
The antichrist is born and no one bats an eye.
Say nigger online and you're finished.

>>84795780
eat shit. lol.
>>84795789
>tests
that's the problem. the bottleneck. also, intelligence in humans increases through time given the ever improving quality of medical services and nutrients.
The short of it, is that intelligence level is a combination of lots of factors.
>muh software engineering
I've studied it too. Not hard. All the management, planning, electronics, all of it.
>but they get paid a lot less than me so in your model those people must be less smart
first of all, this is a fallacy. there is no universal correlation between the intelligence level and money. we have a lot of data and it is established pretty well by now.
secondly, are you so sure a chemist is paid less than a software engineer? reality is too broad to make such a statement, because different positions/experience levels/businesses/so forth pay differently.

>>84795411
Because they use unreliable estimates because it's a hype company

>>84795398
I was 145 iq at one point but probably much lower now thanks to all the drug abuse

it is truly hell

>>84795813
>The problem with midwits is that they don't deal with nuance well.
might ironic, considering the words you're quoting. Do you know what "not 100%" means? kek.
>Do you think hair color isn't hereditary because two brown haired people can have a blonde baby?
intelligence is not hair color, because Albert Einstein has had way higher intelligence level than his parents did, regardless of the hair color.
I'll repeat myself, humans (the whole world) do not completely know/understand the human genetics. And this thread is a perfect depiction of this point. However, I don't doubt for a second that we will fully know and understand human genetics at some point in the future.

>>84795794
Fuck off, a chimp can study as much as it wants, it will never understand Pythagoras theorem

>>84795889
Drugged brainy folk get better SAT results than sober idiots

>>84795918
you are correct. But the irony is hillarious, considering I didn't say anything of sorts.

>>84795868
>intelligence in humans increases through time given the ever improving quality of medical services and nutrients.
You're confusing an increasing average with an increasing value at high percentiles. Nutrients can't turn someone born with idiot genetics into a genius, even though malnutrition can turn someone born with genius genetics into an idiot.
>The short of it, is that intelligence level is a combination of lots of factors.
No shit. Genetics is by far the most important, though.
>>muh software engineering
>I've studied it too. Not hard. All the management, planning, electronics, all of it.
The hard part is the practice, not the study.
>>but they get paid a lot less than me so in your model those people must be less smart
>first of all, this is a fallacy. there is no universal correlation between the intelligence level and money. we have a lot of data and it is established pretty well by now.
"Making more money is better"
"Um excuse me do you have a citation for that?"
Midwit hours
>secondly, are you so sure a chemist is paid less than a software engineer? reality is too broad to make such a statement, because different positions/experience levels/businesses/so forth pay differently.
The bureau of labor statistics publishes average salaries for various occupations. The average chemist in the USA makes less than I made at my first job in software and now I make about eight times as much as that. Throwing up your hands and saying the world is too complex to come to any conclusions is a retarded sentiment, it's our job as smart people to develop the tools to make good decisions about complex things.

File: 1773949298633805.jpg (30 KB, 680x353)

30 KB JPG

>>84795906
>intelligence is not hair color, because Albert Einstein has had way higher intelligence level than his parents did, regardless of the hair color.
I genuinely hope you're trolling me

>>84795967
>"Making more money is better"
is it? I'd say it depends on the tax system.
>"Um excuse me do you have a citation for that?"
You're provably wrong, because there are indeed studies dedicated to the money vs intelligence questions.
>Midwit hours
you bet. all of reddit is on here right now. you might just be one of them.
>Throwing up your hands and saying the world is too complex to come to any conclusions
Did not say that. Just pointed out, that there are plenty of variables one must take into account when making a generalization about salary. Not to mention that the world is not the U.S. But who cares, amigirht?
TL;DR: You can stop fighting the windmills now. Intelligence is not a 100% hereditary trait and that's the end of it. It's current science.

>>84795994
hair color is a physical property, intelligence is not.

>>84795877
I think this aswell. It is just a bunch of bologna

>>84795998
>Intelligence is not a 100% hereditary trait and that's the end of it.
Right, the study I posted had the value at 86% heritable. I'm glad we agree.

>>84796005
Your brain is a physical object. Your neurons are physical objects. Intelligence is physical.

>>84795889
High IQ people want to be more retarded to calm the brain down. Lots of addicts have iqs that are miserable to live with.

Go back to twitter, homosexual namefag, stop advertising shitty blue check tweets.

>>84795398
Living with higher fluid intelligence entails seeing more of the positive, but also more of the negative. If all else would be equal in your life it would probably benefit you overall, but all else is never equal. IQ is a strong predictor, not the sole factor.

>>84795398
>99.99 percentile
>female embryo
so... 115 IQ?

>>84795398
i am in the top 1%, and honestly i wish i could feel happiness instead, i am in a permanent state of anhedonia. i don't think others are retarded, there is always something to learn from everyone. i might be intelligent, but i dont know it all

>>84795411
They travel to the future and give the child an IQ test, if it doesn't work they come back and throw the embryo away.

>>84795398
>2026
>not scoring in the 99.99th percentile in an IQ test as an embryo
NGMI, how much did you losers even score in IQ tests when you were embryos?

>>84795398
I got IQ screened on 2 days no sleep during a psych examination. Maxed nonverbal at the test's 150, and verbal at 138. Since, despite having worked at a movie theater I have never once heard or seen the word matinee, and some other obscure word like obsequious.
> Deeply suicidal
> Deep disdain for lack of communication and authority. Diagnosed autistic. I'm not going to guess how you feel and ask clarifying questions for intent. Since, I know, studies show even non-autistic people are super biased and bad at it.
> Nothing is interesting enough to catch my attention let alone hold it. Diagnosed as inattentive ADHD.
> Most people are insufferable, or are overwhelmed by me when I'm not apathetic, or talk about my non-surface level issues. So I self isolate a lot to work on it myself. Diagnosed as Schizoid.
> Like my biological mom, started abusing drugs to find meaning, joy, or make myself retarded in the process. Didn't work.

Intelligence beyond a certain point of the average is isolating and raises your odds of suicide by quite a bit and lowering average salary - due to apathy, I'd assume. Unless you're deeply autistic for a mentally stimulating or meditative passion, everything kinda sucks. Or like
>>84795655
You coast and feel great.
> In advanced classes... Still usually the smartest person in the room
Lmao tryhard. (I'm jealous you care and find joy in it)

>>84795398
did they IQ test the sperm?

>>84796599
none of that is different from my experience and i'm a 100 IQ midwit.

>>84795530
Why would a genius NOT smear poop?

>>84795398
Top one percent is very different from top point zero one percent

>>84795420
>I mean us incels are all below avg iq since intelligence is associated with looks
This is a butchering of a statistic. Attractiveness CAN BE associated with being perceived as more intelligent, mainly if you're a man. In my experience, pretty women seem to be seen as dumb, especially if they're blond. Many people see through this.

>>84795655
What's your IQ, though? Are you really top 1%?

>>84796860
To my understanding, IQ is kinda retarded. Even low IQ individuals can hold positions of high intellectual requirements. They just have to put in more work (time + effort), as the correct answer isn't as intuitive, and often require more guidance [be it how simplified/detailed the guidance is, and/or amount] when teaching and correcting misconceptions.

My last partner was definitely not as smart as me, but they had one hell of a memory and ease to which they'd study for hours. Meanwhile, I'd sit around sweating from how stressed I was expending so much willpower. I learn and see concepts, systems, and "whys" mostly, while they would use rope memorization techniques as much as possible. I'd often be shocked how well she'd know something without understanding it. Id learn the same amount within a fraction of the time (unless you count my stress induced procrastination), with far more effort.

One of my favorite things I heard about intelligence, is that intelligent people aren't wrong less - just in more interesting and thought out ways. I fear I'm wrong here and just speaking out of my ass from misconceptions about intelligence from my own biased view that intelligence is a curse. All backed by some studies I read ages ago and can't be asked to source or verify. I see things others don't as easily, with an inability to convey it simply. I fall into anti-social philosophical traps, and intense self awareness. I'd just say it's... Easier to see reasons to be miserable? Despite self imposed misery being irrational - I don't think IQ concerns itself with rationality, morality, etc.

>>84796957
I haven't had it formally tested, I don't see the point. Maybe I'm actually top 2%, who knows?

>>84795398
it means they'd be a schizophrenic nerd

>>84796599
>Diagnosed autistic
>Diagnosed as inattentive ADHD
>Diagnosed as Schizoid
schizoid diagnosis excludes autistics, get a better shrink

>>84797319
That's cool, had no clue. I just wanted Adderall. I also said "as", since I've gone to many shrinks and don't particularly believe in most psychology as anything more than... A grounded version of astrology? With some exceptions, of course. Even then, people can fake stuff, misidentify their experiences, the outcomes, and be misinterpreted. Too much lost through language. Plus, I described what caused me to be diagnosed as those things, since. I don't really think I identify with those things. ADHD I do however, seeing as Adderall feels like nothing and forcing myself to do stuff is marginally easier on it. Supposedly it feels more euphoric for normal people.

Kinda assumed most of this was inferable.

>>84795398
I've tested in that range and yeah, everyone is pretty retarded.
The feeling mellows out in adulthood as people specialize, can more frequently meet people who know more on a subject than you and thus can have a decent conversation.

I squandered my intelligence on a high-midwit tier career because I didn't want to go on to grad school.
Is a sore point that I don't get any sympathy for. Everyone around me sees me as a "success", but I know that this is failure and as the years pass it eats more of me.

>>84795411
It's fake engagement bait garbage like most everything on twitter. The reply op posted even has that bogstandard bot formatting you see in a lot of Twitter replies trying to drum up engagement

File: screenshot.png (54 KB, 600x260)

54 KB PNG

>>84795398
>Everyone at school, work , home or internet would seem like retard to you
The result is fucking boredom. It's utter boredom because not even competitive school systems allow students to skip many grades. Someone above 2 SD the mean IQ can skip 3-4 years but that rarely happens. Why? Because that requires continued motivation from the kids, the parents and the school.
>exams are so easy you don't study
>you don't learn how to study
Intelligence is a double edged sword and the education system caters to the lowest common denominator. Not talent.
>>84795411
It's a guess at best. These companies are incentivized to inflate statistics.

>>84795513
>transitions to female
OMG yass

>>84795398
I think it's less extreme than being with someone mentally challenged but yeah most people are kind of...slow when compared to me and it can be kind of exhausting. Ever since I entered academia I've more or less been surrounded by people similar to me so it's even more stark when I interact with quote on quote normal people, one I didn't realize recently is how long it takes for people to read something I can read 5 pages worth of stuff in a few minutes for most people I realize it takes a while. The best cmpoarison I can make is like being in high school forever where you're the one being proactive and leading everything, maybe like a 2-3 year gap but forever.

this world doesn't value intelligence though. every person in power is a low inhibition sociopath. every popular person is a performative retard

also he might end up some tranny whose memorized every lore of my little pony

>>84798719
This world does value intelligence though you're just coping there's tons of low inhib psychos who don't end up doing anything good because they're just sperg druggies you realistically need both it's simply that intelligence enough doesn't guarantee success but a decent amount of both brutal n' cunning is needed

>>84795398
i'm probably close and it doesn't help that much.
maybe top 0.1% would be enough to carry you through life despite adverse conditions.

>>84798734
it doesn't value intelligence at all

when was the last time a woman said they slept with a guy because he was intelligent lmao

you'll get used as fodder for patents and pitches while the marketing CEO sociopath takes all the credit

>>84798734

The world does not value real raw high intelligence

It values low iq mass appeal bullshit and people who can deceive the masses

>>84799425
Intelligence is a tool, it's valued based on what it produces.

>>84798872
what's your IQ and was it WAIS or SB? And when were you tested?
I was tested a child and scored pretty high, but I don't think the numbers would hold up today.