What does IQ attempt to prove other than cognitive speed? It isn't even fixed and different populations have had drastic changes over decades. Its like they think its a power-level from DBZ but for intelligence. When you don't used biased retard sources (Like Richard Lynn) you find generally most of humanity is around 85-100. No one can really explain how big of a difference 90 and 100 is or why it matters. Or how much can be changed over time, no one can prove it's tied to phenotype rather than different populations being in different environments leading to a overall average.Furthermore when you look at studies that analyze wealth, nutrition and education you see a huge difference in IQ. Pic related is an example of thousands of Nigerian student IQ scores separated by wealth, family size and school type. Majority of upper-class have optimal IQ(100). Most with smaller families have optimal IQ. Lower-class and large families have sub-optimal. Why are there so many varieties if they're all the same phenotype? Intelligent nonbiased responses only plzz
>>84823895>other than cognitive speed?>so you think we're dumber just because we don't think as fast!?
>>84824174IQ attempts to measure speed but does a horrible job at it. It doesn't measure your total speed but how fast you process different patterns. If you process a bunch of useless junk faster than other people are you "faster" or smarter than others? Lastly, please explain to me how drastic a 10 point IQ difference is or how much it matters
>>84823895>race realistyou mean racists
