[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (77 KB, 2563x825)
77 KB PNG
I think the concept of looksmatching, while it might be interesting, is completely irrelevant and pointless when preference will just be given to women anyway. Even in a simple abstraction, someone will say that an abstraction of a woman stick figure is actually closer to a 10/10 rather than just a normal, adequate woman with nothing exceptional about her.

Therefore looksmatching or figuring out how to quantify your looks is completely pointless. The only thing that actually determines the value in the aggregate is your status in society, which is also genetically determined.
>>
The entire concept of a "looks match" is a cope for low value males. The demand/supply curves are not equivalent and not linear for males/females
>>
>>84852820
The entire concept is not a cope, the concept of someone being matched in looks to their equivalent is just an ontological fact. However, using it to try and appeal to some unknown force in the universe to get around the fact that men have less social credit than women in the modern anglosphere west, is veritably cope.
>>
does brainmaxxing not work in murica? like brainmaxx -> high paying job -> get married to decent looking trad woman?
>>
File: 1781775159729134.png (33 KB, 2563x825)
33 KB PNG
>>84852698
boobs too small
stacy needs big fake cowtits
>>
File: file.png (65 KB, 2321x787)
65 KB PNG
>>84852853
>does brainmaxxing not work in murica? like brainmaxx -> high paying job -> get married to decent looking trad woman?
Yes, depending on your IQ. The normal distribution also applies here. If you can alchemize social status out of pixels and pieces of paper with your synapses and braincells, then you are smart, but you're probably in the upper portion of the distribution.
>>
>>84852901
that is the only path ive found given my autism. make billionares richer and serve them while getting some medium size wagecuck buckaroonies.
>>
>>84852910
You probably aren't autistic, and you're probably adequately intelligent, not exceptional. You should keep in mind that the economy doesn't really reflect merit and won't make sense if you look at it from that angle. Being ethnic or a woman, for example, is way more profitable because it's more valuable to those said billionaires.
>>
>>84852942
i agree with you. if i were smarter i would be good enough to go into a quant company like the rest of my friends. instead of math i must make do with the sciences.

im curious though, does being ethnic still help nowadays? the ones i see now are just overworking to keep their shitty visas and its just borderline exploitation from what i see.
>>
>>84852698
Every woman is a 10/10 in my eyes hence I never approach
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (47 KB, 1280x720)
47 KB JPG
>>84853030
we found him
but i do sort of agree with your sentiment anon

they are 10/10 until you learn about them or talk to them or hear anything from/about them
>>
>>84852956
>does being ethnic still help nowadays?
Perhaps not as much as being female, but I would still rather apply as a Muhammad or a Gupta than a John Smith or a Mike Jones.

>>84853030
Is it that you have tremendous difficulty understanding what the numbers are trying to quantify or do you just refuse to engage with the concept out of a need for attention?
>>
>>84853240
I'm either attracted or I'm not. If I'm attracted then I think they're too good for me and don't want to make a move. I find 90% of women attractive
>>
>>84853278
Ah, so it's the latter. Carry on then. Do you think you're going to be validated or find a woman by posting in 4chan about this? Surely it's happened before, so best of luck.
>>
>>84853386
Is this your thread?
>>
>>84853422
Of course. Is this not NTA?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.