Are INFP girls the most likely to be femcels
>>84860303femcels don't exist. They're just psychotic retards who push every guy who shows actual interest in them away the moment they try to show sexual interest
>>84860303you don't look like that>t. infj
>>84860303I don't really believe in "femcels"(at least, not as equivalent of incel, they are exclusively volcels) but...Feeloid woman is what's expected by the average male and society at large, so I don't think being an INFP would cause them to be considered less desirable on its own. Maybe you are confusing it with being neurotic(no Jungian type is that by default, they only become neurotic through a particularly one-sided attitude of their "preferences").Thinkoid woman probably has more issues here, since males want to be the thinkoid of the relationship usually.
>>84861467>no Jungian type is that by default, they only become neurotic through a particularly one-sided attitude of their "preferences"Considering this to be the full explanation for all mental illness is getting pretty close to four humors-tier pseudoscience
>>84861538It's not a full explanation of anything. I'm just saying that type alone doesn't tell you how neurotic somebody is, unless you can prove it's specifically about having developed a certain one-sidedness(e.g. a Thinking type who has a very strongly repressed Feeling as opposed to complementary)
>>84860303no because femcels don't exist
i would kill for an infp gf
>>84861717What's attractive about INFP girlfriends?
>>84861721Nothing IRL, anon thinks they are going to be anime girls.
>>84861721rich internal worldromanticism and idealismemotional exclusivity and withdrawnoften internalized bitternessi wish she'd invite me to her little world and let me explore it and she could lean on me and we could both heal each other and be perfectly different
>>84861927functionally anime girls exist irl
>>84861995Where are they tho
>>84861999they expire
How the fuck am I supposed to get a femcel gf when all of them spend their entire life inside their room and barely ever socialize even on the internet?
>>84860303I'm a femcel and I'm ISTP-T
>>84860303How do you guys keep up with these silly personality types? No offense but it sounds like some fucking gobbledygook to give young impressionable people some gay identity that doesn't exist. Dude I'm soo FGSKHJAF I wish I had a GNEJKGR girlfriend, I really don't get along with GERJGN people. Get a grip.
>>84862287are u a real woman or just someone claiming to be?you can never be sure here
>>84862317these personality types are just the astrology signs for people who think they are intellectuals
>>84862317The big dick move is to read actual Jung, ignore anything else, but use the labels just because it's more convenient than typing "introverted feeling-intuition type where intuition is auxiliary to feeling, and sensation/thinking are inferior functions used in extraversion"
>>84862362You're probably just proving his point that this is all gobbledygook nonsense
>>84862324>are u a real woman or just someone claiming to be? Real woman
>>84862375I wasn't opposed to the original point since I'm indeed only stealing the modern labels while disregarding the current takes on the theory, but there was something valuable behind it if you fall back to the man who discovered the extraverted/introverted types, or the 4 functions.
>>84862395No I mean the allegedly superior source material is also pretty dumb and Jung himself saying that every person is an exception means you shouldn't carry it too far or be too rigid about it
>>84862413>the allegedly superior source material is also pretty dumbIt's pretty good, but it deals with issues that are more abstract than what we usually mean by "personality traits".> every person is an exception means you shouldn't carry it too far or be too rigid about itCertainly, but that doesn't mean there are no types, but rather that you should see typology as a bunch of reference points, or a skeleton without the flesh, or a map rather than the territory, you get the point.
>>84862460Pretty misleading reference points though. You can't really know someone from r9k posts where people accentuate or emphasize certain traits for their own personal reasons, or even just larp and shitpost with their posts a full facade
>>84862487>Pretty misleading reference points thoughOn their own they aren't.>You can't really know someone from r9k posts where people accentuate or emphasize certain traits for their own personal reasons, or even just larp and shitpost with their posts a full facadeBut sure enough, typing people off 4chan is for shit and giggles.You are very much trusting that somebody tells you their real type, or that an observation you make about them resonates with who they are enough that they tell you indirectly.
>>84862512Yeah, and that observation can easily be your own mistaken interpretation, people are too complicated to intuit too much from one data point
>>84862527That much I can easily agree with. If we wanted to really understand somebody's type, we need a good part of their history at least.There is also such a thing as the difference between your natural disposition(or your original type) and what your current behavior represents. Another complication would be your "works" or "creations", they don't necessarily reflect the conscious type, even if many people fall for the trap of typing these things rather the individual behind them, an introvert can write the most extraverted stuff ever if he feels inspired that way.
>>84862542>There is also such a thing as the difference between your natural disposition(or your original type) and what your current behavior represents.Yes and this is the biggest flaw in MBTI communities, someone's behavior or exterior tells you little to nothing about their mind or thought processes; they might be presenting themselves in a certain way to achieve a goal, for convenience, or to be more palatable. Vibe typing someone's exterior is one thing, claiming to know their true type is arrogance.
>>84862568My man was well aware of all these things, it's indeed the modern MBTI approach that's glossing over what he actually said. Like that post was a tl;dr version of him clarifying what he's doing with his own typology.
>>84862588>tl;drI read it tho
>>84862594Based and my nigga.
>>84862381What would it take for you to be my gf?
>>84860303This inspired me to take it and I got infp-t. What that mean
>>84863336That you are depressive and neurotic
>>84862287>>84860303would you be open to talking you an intp moid
I took these MBTI tests before and got INTJ as a kid, but keep getting either INFP or ISFP now. What the fuck does this mean?
I was supposed to be productive today but it's 11:50 and all I've done is watch YouTube videos.
>>84863395It can mean quite a few things. It could be simply the tests sucking cocks, it could be you not thinking about the answers much, or it could be genuine character development.You should ask yourself why you are answering differently.
>>84863437What are the best tests
>>84863455Obviously introspection and reading Psychological Types from Jung, you could start from Chapter 10 and 11 purely for typing/vocabulary purposes.
>>84863437Well, as a kid I used to be super spergy. Nowadays though I do think that emotions are a lot more valuable- they are what give life colour after all.I also try to be more thoughtful in conversation (online at least) and ask more about people I am talking to and taking interest in the shit they do instead of just going "mhm, okay, yeah".Confused on the inconsistency of getting S or N though. Probably because the tests keep asking shit like "ARE YOU A KIND NUTURING PERSON ARE YOU SMART ARE YOU CRTEATIVE????? R U JESUS???" and I feel like answering positive on that shit would just be me being delusional. These tests are shit anyway and not that good an indicator of a person. I am most definitely not "creative" like ISFP says and I am 99% sure I am not "empathetic" or "speak my truth" like INFP says I do.
