>>84873045
I'll stop when its stops mattering, otherwise eat shit whore.

>>84873045
Lol most men don't give a fuck about a girl's body count. However it's crazy that most women are going to end up with higher body counts than most men ?
Anyone mind explaining this to me why that's the case and how that's fair ?

>>84873045
Plenty of us leftist progressive nice guy incels who don't care about body count. Where's the females willing to settle for us? I deserve a lefty gf with a high body count. Where the fuck is she? Oh yeah she's getting pumped and dumped by sexist bigot chads who judge her for her body count unlike me. Fucking lol.

>>84873373
Ikr ? Men way more toxic than men like us who do give fuck about women and them being seen as equals to us don't give us attention for shit.

>>84873359
>>84873467
It is statistically and scientifically proven that higher body count in women = more dysfunctional relationships and higher failure rates, post-virginity also changes the priorities and personalities of women, after having sex for the first time a woman is more likely to shift towards resources and status than pure love or emotional connection.
tl:dr: having a non-virgin woman is suboptimal

>>84873519
I'm not so perfect myself anon nor do I expect my partner to be perfect herself. The issue is that women in general give toxic men more of a chance than nice men like us. I don't care about a woman's past. They take it up the ass on everything about a guy but when we give them leniency about their body counts, they still prefer toxic men .

>>84873644
is it not their fault in a biological sense, women are naturally repulsed by "nice guys" and prefer the dominant ones with an abundant mindset, this is not entirely irrational though it is rooted in primal psychology of wanting protection, safety and good genes + the excitement that may come with it.
Thinking that women in general should or will prefer nice guys is delusional cope.