Chinese families chose their one child a boy, because male are inherently more valuable and much more useful. For continuing the farmwork and for taking care of you when you're old. And other reasons.So I don't want to hear crybaby dude bro idiots talk about "women are just inherently valuable and men, dey not! Dats da ting you know mang?" When it comes down to it and a society has to choose between the two, they choose men, because men are all around superior and more useful inherently.
>>84878529Useful trees get cut down
>>84878587Unless it's a tree that actually produces fruits.Trees that get cut down are the ones that are just useful for their bark, their natural bodies without doing any work to produce fruit.
>>84878600Yes, women are the trees that produce fruit of new life. Men are the ones that get used as firewood to maintain life.
>>84878648That'd be totally opposite. Because men supposedly have to work to produce value, and women are just used for their bodies. Which is true, they are, men can invent and build, and produce music and art and entertainment.Women have constantly just been used up for what they naturally are.
>>84878673Tree doesn't work to produce the fruit. It does it by itself because it is in it's nature. Anyone can work to make art or build something but only females can give birth to new life.
>>84878529>because men are all around superior and more useful inherently.More useful, in a sense of disposability and working your back to death. You are not more loved. Also we don't live in Industrially lacking societies like rural China anymore.People nowadays just want to feel good and cum and other men is seen as nothing more as competition unlike women.
>>84878767I don't think men see each other as competition, that's a woman thing women say they see other women as competition and they're constantly jealous of each other's ability to attract men.It's not about working to death. It's about building and creating in general. Yes you'd obviously rather have 100 male works than female on nearly any physical job, but also on nearly anything else. Creating and producing is valuable and women are just there to give pleasure. Yes an onahole is valuable on its own, but more inherently valuable than a hammer or violin? You still have to use the onahole too, it's easy you're not building or producing, and more people are going to just want an onahole rather than learn to play an accordion, but anyone would say the accordion has more value.And some men can have value in their sexual-ness, and some women can have value in what they can do apart from that, though not often, in all history women are the tiny minority of creative work and invention as men are the minority of sexual desire. And it's not as though all women are automatically desired sexually they have to work to make sure they are valuable in that way.and not used, ugly, and unpleasant. No one wants to automatically be around every woman or invite them into their home to keep them, unless they act proper and have a proper body the man wants. To be an ugly woman is to be the most miserable creature in that way.
>>84878834Value on utility instead of maternity has its benefits, even if utilitarian and materialist, of course. Not everything is bad. But your value also ends in there. If you lose your legs for example, your life is basically over as your utility too. Just look how disabled veterans were treated around history. Compared to how women are treated in accidents of these sorts, we can clearly find an inherent value in women that aren't in men.
