>Your MBTI type
intp
>How much do you sleep?
not enough i do a bunch of stuff to try to sleep better but i span between 4 and 7 hours a night when im sleeping "good" i generally get 6 hours and if i get anything like above 7 it's incredible
>(Optional) Do you like sleeping?
i like being well rested
>(Optional) What's something you stayed up late for?
programming a game im working on
>Secret: Are you depressed?
i wouldn't say so but a psych probably would desu

my melatonin is MINE and it will do what I tell it to. if i want to use my phone right up until i pass out that's what i'll do. melatonin is just melanin for the brain that makes you lazy and useless. sleeping is for nigger-brains. fuck niggertonin and fuck sleep

File: __houraisan_kaguya_and_te(...).jpg (26 KB, 277x160)

26 KB JPG

>Your MBTI type
INTP
>How much do you sleep?
Around 6 to 8 hours a day, I'm kinda messed up.
>(Optional) Do you like sleeping?
Not really, but dreaming is nice.
>(Optional) What's something you stayed up late for?
College assignments 'cause procrastination.
>Secret:
Nope.

https://strawpoll.com/eNg6vaQ1jgA

File: mbti.jpg (86 KB, 902x606)

86 KB JPG

>>84890974
>>Your MBTI type
>>How much do you sleep?
5-7 hrs

>>84891514
>Around 6 to 8 hours a day
That's fucked.

File: ezgif-6e5dd1e693bac8dd.gif (482 KB, 404x500)

482 KB GIF

>>84890974
>Type
INTP
>How much do you sleep?
12-15 hours a day
>Do you like sleeping?
It's one of the highlights of my day. Getting to turn my entire body off and doing nothing for as long as I please. When you're in bed, nothing else exists and nothing else matters.
>What's something you stayed up late for?
Waiting for the grocery store to open
>Are you depressed
I can't say I've ever felt "depressed". I don't know what that exactly entails. I can say I've felt bad or off-kilter at times, often times maybe, but I don't know what depression is actually supposed to mean

ok guys knock it off

>*knocks u off*

>>84891604
>Waiting for the grocery store to open
ayy, based. I haven't early morning shoppinged in ages, considering getting some chocolate milk myself.

>>84891029
Ah, a fellow melatonin and melanin confuser

>>84892284
Gah! My choice specs!

>>84892312
I like to early morning shop, but my irregular sleep schedule often gets in the way. Also, I'm a dark chocolate supremacist.

>>84892405
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgJCkByLHuE

>>84892432
Gnaaa!

Amelia from the crossroads game honestly comes across to me as the Anima of your typical online uh twitter/4chan user these days. The sort of person who is kind of a cantankerous edgelord made manifest in attire that is more like that of a leftoid woman but she is a chud! Honestly there seems to be a bit of a subconscious realization that a lot of right-wing women are pretty damn demanding but Amelia, she wouldn't be demanding and unlike your typical anime waifu she is a racist and unlike say Frieren she is also not a total baby half the time despite being an old granny too. It's like the perfect woman for the type of guy who listens to the occasional metal but is also just kind of a dweeb in general. Like the Ramona Flowers for chuds

>>84892647
The arthoe/alternative/goth look has never, ever, ever not been appealing to most men, including those on the right side of things, the 'problem' with the arthoes is often what comes with it; the baggage, the fact that she may have had five abortions already, even tho she's 22, the fact that she takes 4 different types of medication on a daily basis including 2 SSRIs, etc etc

Now, the character itself isn't deep, obviously, it's the woman that made the thing that went 'oh wow what if you took me, the artist that grew up in the 80-90s, give her clothes that I'd wear nowadays, and make her, omg, RIGHT WING' and voila, that was it, the fact that they didn't make amelia 'look' right wing (aka 'trad') is in itself pretty ironic, but also, funny, because it's clear that most people are missing the point; the look has never been the issue, never will be, and a woman that wears trad clothes isn't going to look more attractive than a arthoe, it's a subjective thing mind you, and there are little things here and there that guys go after because of arbitrary reasons, like glasses because their first love had glasses, or other stupid shit

Anyways, your ramblings made me think about this;
Guys, especially 'traditionally oriented' ones, which nowadays we call 'far right' or 'alt right' or 'chud' do NOT want a woman that is trad and became trad on her own, you do not want a woman that's able to go against the grain and 'have her own mind', because you, as a traditional man, you need a woman that's going to shut the fuck up and listen to her man; that's the gist of it and that's the important part about amelia, and it's probably a very subconscious thing, you want a woman that is hot but that you can nudge where you want her to be, you want one that you can groom into becoming a woman that's worth your time, a woman that of her own volition became able to tell all her entourage 'fuck you I'm my own being' will never, ever, be yours, and thus, she ain't for you

I wonder why it is that specific obscure, rarely used words seem to enter the collective consciousness at the same time and appear to repeat with some sort of fervent frequency.

>>84883632
>>84883765
I think you misunderstand what I mean when I say that you don't know and therefore you don't act; the example you give, a man with rage issues, this isn't an unconscious issue, it's a subconscious one, but it will present itself and when it does, it will be a conscious thing, you know you're angry when you're angry, when you're aroused you can feel it, when you're happy you can feel it, those are real emotions that come from hormones and brain chemicals going awooga and doing real, material things

But it's not a good example; because in a world in which you would never ever interact with anything or anyone; what would you ever feel rage towards?
Nothing, and therefore, you would never know of your rage issues, it's not a good example because then you say 'it'll appear at some point' and I'm like, yeah, obviously, if it's something as simple and omnipresent as a feeling of anger, then yeah obviously you will be angry at some point in your life, but when it comes to more obscure or niche feelings, things you don't know about and wouldn't ever know about unless they were presented to you, then how the fuck would that work?
You can say 'it just does! it's happening in the background and if it doesn't then it'll do something else completely unrelated', that just sounds like mental gymnastics to me, I don't see it, I don't understand the logic behind it, it's not real

>I didn't say require, I said it's beneficial for you to know about it
How would knowing I enjoy eating literal shit be beneficial to me in any way shape or form, ever?
I mean this defeats my argument of 'anything that's supposedly bad can turn out to be good', but it's still something you don't want to know about because the bads that come with it are very very very high risk, and the reward is both potentially low and very very very unlikely to be good
aka; don't know about it and don't do it, that's most likely good and the 'most good' about it

File: A Centaur's Life Volume 2(...).jpg (95 KB, 632x505)

95 KB JPG

I haven't been this greasy and crusty in a while. It's great! When did I last shower again? I can't remember! I think it's only been a week or so, but it feels like longer since it's warm and I've been on my bike back and forth from work etc.

Oh well, time for my chocolate milk quest!

>>84890974
>Your MBTI type
INFP
>How much do you sleep?
Sporadically. Sometimes a few hours but usually quite a long time. When I have something to do the next day I usually find it very diffucult to sleep.
>(Optional) Do you like sleeping?
No I hate it, I'd be much happier if I just never got tired instead.

>>84892825
It's a mix of people running on similar software means they spontaneously get bored around the same time, wanting to use a new word as soon as you hear it and also gaslightiest of all, you noticing things a lot more when you become aware of them, of course.

>>84892832
Goodness, 6 on the dot?

>>84892825
Hoomans be social creatures, and they like feeling like they're part of the group, using the new 'cool' terms makes you feel cooler and more part of the group because 'look, I'm just like you'
I think it's really not much deeper than that

I mean you're on r9k right now, why would anyone want to 'be' or 'appear to be' or 'be part of' being a robot/incel/chud/whatever other word you can come up with?
Nobody would want this, realistically, you don't want to do this, but we do, we're all here because we form a collective, it's not the majority or the big group but it's a group, it's our social little group where we're all incels and femoids and we love and hate eachother, just like a big family

File: 5826a7a33e92103619b8acd3b(...).jpg (381 KB, 1536x2048)

381 KB JPG

> 84891559
>strawpoll
> 84892647
>chuds
> 84892847
>Hoomans be social creatures
Certified goyslop thread.

>>84884053
By the way, know that I honestly really enjoy our little discussions like this one, though it may sound like I'm just debating like anyone would do on 4chin, this is my way of figuring myself out, if I'm the monkey with the typewriter, at some point I'll be typing real words here and there and I can make sense of them, this is one such example

>But, my notion of God doesn't really align with the Christian notion of God. What God means to me is very different to them.
I completely understand what you mean, though in my case I wouldn't call it god, not yet, it's very akin to it in the same way you seem to understand it, but different at the same time
I think I'm more of a 'human consciousness is what god is' kinda guy, which I know is pretty heretical in general and which is why I wouldn't call it 'god' because it wouldn't serve as a term that's mutually understood in the same way
and though I'm fine with discussing it overall, my general attitude towards people trying to tell me what faith should be is that 'my faith ain't your business, it's not the business of the church either, or the bible, it's my and 'his' business' (yes, thanks lobsterman for this one, but it's not like I didn't feel this way before he put it into words, he's just that good at gluing words together in a way that resonates with people/me)

>>84892837
>>84892877
it's okay centaur-kun, know that no matter how angy you may get at my posts sometimes, I still enjoy seeing you around

>>84892847
I would agree with what you're saying if the word appeared in the same play then spread. For example of someone said superfluous here, and then suddenly people here started started using superfluous to describe things.
But that's not how it happens. The words appear multiplicatively across people whom have no connection to each other. Like someone in my real life will say a word I've not heard in years, then someone here will say that same word in the same day, then I'll stumble across a random YT video with 3000 views and that word will appear again.

>>84892877
I am a goy and this is my slop. There are many like it but this thread is mine

>>84892898
Hey I don't need credit for a cutie patootie post. Only the real deal needs the acknowledgement. Anyway it's only individual posts that make me upset rather than specific posters and I probably couldn't even give you a specific pattern there. A lot of the posts I get a visceral reaction to are my own and not always even in an oh god why did I post that sort of way. I'm always at least proud to see yours.

>>84885211
I'll still try to answer this one, because it's something I notice so often and I'm just not happy with the general consensus that people tend to agree on?

I don't disagree with all of what you're saying, but I'm not referring to the entire unconscious aspect of you, or the shadow, you make my point for me here; your need for water is a part of you, but you're not always thirsty; that's my point
Let's project you into the far future, your body is now directly plugged into a machine with tubes running in and out of you that provides your body with the water and nutrients necessary for survival; will you ever feel hunger or thirst then?
If your body is always at the exact state where you're not hungry and not thirsty; what then? Can you ever 'understand' what thirst it at that point?
You may be able to read about it randomly, and yes it'll still be a part of you, but since it will never ever manifest itself; how can you really know you need it? How would you even begin to understand what being hungry is?

Your subconscious then wouldn't have to deal with it, it'll just do something else, just like your brain doesn't think about jacking off 24/7, but then you see a goth gardevoir and bam, back to it we go
Part of it still; sure, but so detached from what is happening to you and what you can do/have access to that it might as well not exist, and that's what I'm referring to; you might be a sadist that gets hard as a rock when ripping wings off of birds or something, but if you never do it or never do anything that makes you feel that way, then you won't know about it

And as I replied above somewhere, I don't really care much for the mental gymnastics of 'surely it'll manifest itself in another way!', since you have no way to prove this and thus this is just wishful thinking IMO

>>84892832
Someone can be angry, yet still be unconscious of their anger. They will very often project the anger and claim someone that another person is the one who is angry.
The ego standpoint doesn't identify with the anger, and it creates repressed rage. To themselves, they are not an angry person.
>because in a world in which you would never ever interact with anything or anyone
To be fair, this is an extremely bad example. Such a world doesn't exist.
But, for the sake of argument, we can assume this person lives in complete and utter isolation. They're the only consciousness and only object in the universe. They still have a psyche, so they'd interact with themselves and create stories themselves with characters and tension between the characters because the human psyche contains opposites. And the person experiencing the story of their own telling would experience the emotions of the characters. Because the characters are themself.

The moral of the story, you don't need to interact with external objects to observe the contents of your own psyche. Rage is archetypal, it exists inherently within the psyche and will make itself know sooner or later.
>then how the fuck would that work?
It would be presented to you by your own psyche. Then the choice is yours, acknowledge it, or ignore it.
>How would knowing I enjoy eating literal shit be beneficial to me in any way shape or form, ever?
Because the desire and drive exist within you. If you don't bring those desires into the conscious, they will control you unconsciously and you'll wind up "accidentally" eating shit.
You don't want to accidentally eat shit, do you?
>anything that's supposedly bad can turn out to be good',
Do you know of the Chinese parable about the farmer?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8mY6eLNGus

>>84887719
>There are no situations in which you could possibly use it-but as soon as you live in a community the law begins to operate; and the more populous our cities become the more it will be differentiated, because the conditions where people can hurt each other will become more numerous.
And then, tumblrinas were born and gender and race critical theories came to be, interesting

Reading the musings of some guy that lived in times so different to now that they may as well have been from another planet, but due to them being so smart and/or perceptive, they seem to hit true even now is always fascinating, very interesting indeed

I wouldn't go and directly compare morality and instincts though, because instincts seem to transcend species completely where morality doesn't and seem to be mostly tied within that species itself; for example all animals want to breed and reproduce, they all feel fear when met with something they don't recognize or something they deem to be (potentially) dangerous
But morality doesn't do that, (most?) monkeys have their own forms of morality, like how chimps take care of (and rape) their youngs in very specific ways where bonobos don't do that, and some species seem to understand the principle behind 'fairness' where others' seem to not give a single fuck about it, some are more likely to live in bigger groups and others more tightly knit ones, etc etc

And instincts also transcend... basically everything else, fear can make you act in absolutely, completely irrational ways, where morality at least needs some sort of logical framework to operate, idk

>>84893016
Knowing Jung, he would probably not say instincts are only irrational.
More importantly though, I'm going to guess morality isn't immune to enantiodromia, so an attempt to "over moralize" like we are doing nowadays also breeds a strong need to act against the established morals.

>>84892898
I assumed you were enjoying it. I was also enjoying it, but had to sleep and my mind wandered elsewhere so I didn't continue it. The libido moved elsewhere and the container lost its life. Trying to reassemble the fractured glass in order to pour more liquid into it didn't seem like a good use of time. Then I'd need glue, and I'd almost definitely have imperfections which leaked. Better to just move forward and let a new one arise, than trying to recapture the old.
I also got the sense that you weren't necessarily arguing your beliefs or perspective, and you were more of trying to figure it out as you went along.
Just a complicated way of saying I see you.
>I think I'm more of a 'human consciousness is what god is' kinda guy
I'm fairly close to that idea as well. Interestingly enough, that's a very early Christian conceptualization of God.
But, my idea is more that consciousness comes from God, not that the consciousness we experience is equivalent to God. I suppose there is an argument to be made for the real possibility that our experience of consciousness is God though, in the same sense that the water which flows from a river into the ocean is still the water from the river.

File: 1778644646987.jpg (608 KB, 982x1282)

608 KB JPG

I came to the realization the reason why I'm a bum is entirely my fault and not just cuz I'm autistic because there are like people on the 'tism who are actually successful and I'm just a loser.

>>84893078
You need to understand that you are extremely lucky to be alive right now, in this day and age, where an autist hundreds of years ago was probably doomed to a shitty life (unless maybe you were the number kinda autist and you happened to meet some banker and then things would've turned out okay, but if your dad was a farmer, yeah sucks for you), but as you say, nowadays autism can be very well weaponized and used to your own strength
Autism and retardation are two very different things though, and if you're a 'tard and you're also autistic, I sadly don't have much advices to give you, but otherwise just look around, find your interests, where your autism can be invested, and invest in it, use AI, use youtube, utilize everything you have access to thanks to the technology you have in your hands right now to figure it out and break through

Most people are losers, just keep losing until you win and you'll already do better than 80% of this and the next generation that's probably going to be one shot by the constant AI doomerism of 'oh no what is it all for'

File: 1374263423914.jpg (169 KB, 1000x833)

169 KB JPG

>>84893128
>Most people are losers, just keep losing until you win and you'll already do better than 80%
Anon is trying to 1cc life