Why are there so many failed women?>unskilled dead-end job>failed to do the boss babe routine>no education>childfree>not married>30+>brokeWe don't call women "losers" enough.
>>84923066because the whole world is fucked up. social media companies and greedy corporations don't care about the people they affect, they literally only care about money. everyone is getting fucked over.
>>84923066>We don't call women "losers" enoughwomen already get judged for being childless and unmarried And most people with nothing going for them consider themselves losers
>>84923066Everyone considers them losers what do you mean
>buglet
In a zero sum game there are winners and losers. Blaming those who inevitably lost for their lack of luck is cruel, but cruelty is on par for humanity.
>>84923200>women already get judged for being childless and unmarriedNo, they don't. They're celebrated.>>84923204When was the last time you saw a women get called a loser? A woman can be a fat useless shut-in NEET and she'll be celebrated by the sisterhood.
>>84923362>When was the last time you saw a women get called a loser?>A woman can be a fat useless shut-in NEET and she'll be celebrated by the sisterhood.I get called a loser all the time. Especially by other women whenever I post online doe
>>84923066Women cannot lose. Any women who claims to be a loser is a tranny.
>>84923200>women already get judged for being childless and unmarried as they should you fat whore
>>84923362>No, they don't. They're celebrated.By other women with a similar lifestyle. >A woman can be a fat useless shut-in NEETYou're just mad that they aren't the way you want them to be. Those women aren't the norm you could just ignore and not date them
>>84923614>By other women with a similar lifestyle.No. Women get celebrated no matter what. If women were judged by the same metrics as men, 90% of them would be considered losers.>You're just madShut the fuck up, you dumb hole.
In the same way you can move back in with your parents and be a stay-at-home son, women have this too but also with a large assortment of successful men to choose from unless they really choose to go 3+ decades of letting themselves go. So, if a woman is an obese NEET in her 30s, she's only a month or two out, at most, from moving in with a man with a stable job who'll take care of her, and then she's back on track. Even the least successful women can quickly become normal.You have to be incredibly deformed, disfigured, or drug-addicted+schizophrenic+low IQ (i.e. lowest of the low homeless) to really fail as a woman for long.>>84923646>If women were judged by the same metrics as menWhy would they be? Society isn't structured in anyway where you as a man could ever hope to be the stay-at-home husband (without also being very attractive).
>>84923685Trvthnvke, all it takes to prove this is to just look at the staggering differece in the amount of homeless people by gender.
>>84923685None of this is true. I get called a failure by everyone in life. Im tired of you fags thinking just cause ur male ur life is harder. no bitch you just sucked on your mothers saggy tiddies for too long now you look for a mother in everything. you're 30 and balding now grow up bitch your knot a victim. if you want an easy life so bad get raped for money fucking fag I know you want it bitch worhtles
>>84923685>if a woman is an obese NEET in her 30s, she's only a month or two out, at most, from moving in with a man with a stable job who'll take care of her, and then she's back on trackThat doesn't put her back on track at all. She just found a man to be a replacement parent.These women typically do not fix their life even with full support. In fact, they dig the hole deeper and keep digging unless they can baby-trap a man.Eventually their looks fade and the ability to attract well-off simps is gone.
>>84923744Desuwa, I'm mostly just sad I have to get a job in the most brutal entry-level job market in 40 years, the worst consumer sentiment in 78 years, the worst housing market ever, when AI is being promised to end my ability to ever make money on top of all this, etc.. Women can just date some guy who has been a state accountant for 12 years who can't be fired unless he calls his boss slurs. A job is completely optional for women, basically literally just a passion project, and they still often choose the ratrace over men because we suck so much. I would kill for that.Some women do actually still get called losers, but literally, you're not actually even close to being the same level of loser until you catastrophically fuck up your life, or your face falls off due to an accident/genes.>>84923752What is even wrong with her life at that point? A stable living situation already puts you in a good place. The guy also doesn't need to have a high-income, just median for a guy in his 30s, though, there is obviously an excess of high-income unfuckable men in the US. To not be able to have tons of options requires you to be like over 50 and fat as fuck, i.e. the "3+ decades of letting themselves go".
>>84923809>What is even wrong with her life at that point?broke, no skills, no career, completely dependent on a man, probably childfree.as soon as he gets sick or it, she's out on her ass with nothing to show for all that time>just median for a guy in his 30sthis isn't enough to support an idle adult (nor should any man do it even if he's high income) unless the man is fine with completely wrecking his finances
>>84924139>broke, no skills, no career, completely dependent on a manHow is that bad when your life situation is stable? Oh no, she doesn't have to be a wageslave!>probably childfreeHaving children has rapidly become significantly more unaffordable and has fallen out of cultural favor. Birthrates have collapsed below replacement in around half of all nations, and only 1 (one) first-world country has a TFR above replacement. Nobody knows how to get birthrates back up. Hell, it may never happen and we're going to rely on Africa for all our new people until we go extinct. That said, being childfree isn't a sign of failure to the vast majority of first worlders. It's just the new reality unless you want your QoL to collapse and rely on welfare or you have a very high-income.>she's out on her ass with nothing to show for all that timeShe can move in with her parents and find a new guy rapidly. Obviously she can just get married and get half his shit + alimony, too.>this isn't enough to support an idle adult Yes it is lol. That's around 60k/yr and is easily enough for a 1 bedroom anywhere in America and plenty of groceries except UHCOL cities where the median salary is also like 50+% higher (or you just gotta commute farther than ideal). Paying for another person isn't actually that expensive. At worst, she could get a part-time job and be more than okay.
>>84923066Women can't be losers they can't really be winners either. They aren't obligated to play the game. A low status male is worth less than garbage. A low status woman is just another woman.
>>84924416>How is that bad when your life situation is stable?how is it stable? unless you find a millionaire, you're both fucked on the next round of layoffs or economic downturn>Having children has rapidly become significantly more unaffordable and has fallen out of cultural favor. what's the justification for a man offering full financial support to a woman who won't work and won't have his children?that's too high a price to pay for pussy>She can move in with her parents and find a new guy rapidly.correct. but that is a bad long-term strategy>Obviously she can just get married and get half his shit + alimony, too.men are a lot smarter now. that grift is dwindling.>That's around 60k/yr and is easily enough for a 1 bedroom anywhere in America and plenty of groceriespeak woman brain (or you are a literal child)>uhhh if you're not homeless that's good!>no savings>no retirement>no emergency fund>no investmentsi can't wait for all these dumb hoes to end up homeless in a decade or two. it's already starting, and the market is correcting
>>84924482>next round of layoffs or economic downturnThere are still stable jobs--they just don't exist for zoomers. Layoffs are incredibly unsymmetrical, also. If you're not in tech, you're probably not going to be fired for a long time, especially if you work for the government.>what's the justificationI'm pretty sure because he wants love. I'm not going to say it's worth it for him necessarily, but there are 100s of men at your fingertips if you're a fat ugly woman in her 30s who will take care of you. I don't really understand why people like the taste of wine but people buy billions of dollars of it regardless. That's what's important.A lot of people still do want to have kids, though, and 50% of men do make more than the median income. >that grift is dwindlingWhat is your evidence men don't want to get married anymore?>it's already startingWhat the fuck are you talking about? lol.
>>84924567>I'm pretty sure because he wants love.He won't get it as a simp.>A lot of people still do want to have kidsbirth rates are cratering>What is your evidence men don't want to get married anymore?marriage rates are cratering>What the fuck are you talking about? lol.i'm talking about dumb loser scamming foids getting what they deserve
>>84924593Marriage rates are entirely determined by women. There aren't women who want to get married but can't, unless they're the figurative putrid sludge at the bottom of the barrel with their face ripped off with schizophrenia and fentanyl addiction. An increasing percentage of women would rather work, at least into their 30s, than have kids or dedicate themselves to a man.>He won't get it as a simpIf she can't love him then she can find a new guy. 99.999997% of women have 1000s of options in their area until they reach 50.
>>84923476>t. childless and unmarried faggot
>>84924664>Marriage rates are entirely determined by women.cope>1000s of optionsvery few who will commit, though
>>84924685Show me the women who have no options for marriage. Even completely non-passing hideous trans women have plenty of options. Dating is about finding the ones who will commit, duh.
>>84924739>Show me the women who have no options for marriagedon't twist my words
>>84923066The Jews obviously. They've been tricked into wasting the best years of their lives working for Mr. Shekelstien and getting pumped and dumped.
>>84923066Oh, there are worse.
>>84924769Women are the gatekeepers of relationships/sex. How are women not determining the marriage rates? Any woman who wants marriage is getting into them.>>84924833Is it that hard to imagine that not being subservient to a man in 2026 is worth wageslaving for?
>>84924855>Women are the gatekeepers of relationships/sex.Sex? Yes. Relationships? No.>Any woman who wants marriage is getting into them.The man has to agree, and they're disagreeing at ever-larger rates thanks to seeing women's behavior>not being subservient to a man in 2026 is worth wageslaving for?haha more foidbrain "logic">ewww i'm not gonna obey the man who loves me>instead i will obey a man who doesn't, in a corporate structure that only sees me as a spreadsheet row
>>84924416I agree with you overall anon, however you are overlooking a significant flaw in your argument position in:re children.The entire premise of the "stay at home woman" was the "stay at home mom" position. By being a stay at home mother, the woman was providing value to the man's life in the way only she could (or rather, in the way only a woman could): producing and raising offspring.Without that crucial detail, the entire premise falls apart. Bonding + emotional response? Dog. Companionship? Dog. Riveting conversation? Schizophrenia + Dog. Sex? Masturbation you pervert.Without children the "stay at home woman" position is beyond potentially unstable. Her position is disregarding the idea of "love" but there's nothing really stopping a man from trading in for a new model, except children. You can't swap out their mother. And any attempts at doing so would earn their antipathy due to human bonding (unless she was abusive or something, but then that's on her).Again your point is correct in that women can easily find a man (a man, not their desired man, foids) but your argument hinges on the stability that they can't promise without marriage and children (as a set). In which case 'being a mother' could also be seen as a sort of job, which it is, at least insofar as "anything requiring effort is a job", though by that definition gym and even hobbies are part time jobs insofar as you must expend effort. "But I enjoy those things!" yeah and (a lot of) women enjoy being mothers.
>>84924942>Without children the "stay at home woman" position is beyond potentially unstable.let's just call it what it is: prostitutionall this "stay at home gf", "live-in sugar baby", etc. stuff is just prostitution.women are looking for johns/tricks
>>84924898How not relationships?>they're disagreeing at ever-larger rates Source? Marriage rates declining doesn't support you on this.I'm also not a woman and have said that already. Being a wageslave is being subservient, but it's highly regulated, you get this thing called money, and afterwards you're completely free to do whatever you want. A relationship is in many ways more difficult than a significant portion of jobs. Especially if you're actually passionate about something like nursing or law.>>84924942Well I'm not saying the trade is like an amazing deal, but if you're a lonely man in your 30s staring at a wall or browsing Tiktok after work, having a girlfriend makes life a lot more interesting, even if you lack children. There are plenty of men who will accept this regardless of whether or not it seems appealing to you.Marriage is also a contract that binds you together, albeit the bind increases a lot if you have children, but still, the man will lose a lot if he wants a divorce, which men primarily want a lot less empirically. I do think you need the marriage for it to be technically stable living, though.I'm saying being childfree doesn't make you a loser, not that it always sucks or you shouldn't do have kids generally. If you can afford it, or the welfare state can, go for it. But women can easily get away with not having children if they don't want them.>>84925004Plenty of men would do this too given the chance. It's kind of bizarre to me that more women don't do this.
>>84925061>Plenty of men would do this too given the chance.Incorrect.
