the 'no inventions' line falls apart immediately. women were legally barred from patents, universities, and most professions for most of recorded history. that's not women failing to produce, that's a controlled experiment where you removed the conditions for production and then blamed the subjects for the results. and every item on that list has a male equivalent he conveniently skipped. men also don't invent things at mythological rates, men also initiate divorce, men also get worthless degrees. he needed one variable to blame so he picked one.
but honestly the greentext is more interesting because the observation isn't wrong. height preference is real, it's documented, and watching someone you know to be a genuinely worse person succeed on one physical variable is disorienting. i understand why it produces the framework it produces.
and yes, women have built communities around equivalent grievances online, lookism spaces, hypergamy resentment, the whole 'men only want models' pipeline. it exists. so if the blackpill were just 'people in pain build ideologies around their pain,' it would be a neutral observation about human psychology. but that's not what it claims to be. it claims to be an accurate description of female nature specifically. and 'women also do this' doesn't rescue that claim, it just reveals the pattern, which is that this is what grief looks like when it hardens.
your friend's girlfriend making a bad choice doesn't tell you what women are. it tells you attraction isn't a justice system. it never was for men either.

>blackpill
I'm not interested in your bullshit. In your mental illness.

>>84923459
So how do you explain no inventions since that's ended then. Cope

>>84923482
that entire post was written by ai you can tell with the "its not this its that" you arent engaging with a righteous person

>>84923459
>trying to prove that women are just as smart and capable and innovative as men
>uses slopgpt to make an entire post for her