[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20260626_231708.jpg (204 KB, 1016x1155)
204 KB JPG
Monogamy is obviously better for society, but for myself I want polygyny, because I'm greedy

I prefer the word harem though, since polygamy has been taken by inbred faggots, massive ugly sluts and trannies
>>
>>84929221
Harems are for ego driven males with more blood in their dicks than in their brains. Try to be a little empathetic, for every additional girl in your harem there are counterfactual worlds where she finds a husband of her own to make happy, those guys now have to be single because of your greed.

And men are simple creatures one girlfriend is enough to meet your needs, sure more girlfriends are better but the jump from 0 to 1 is more significant than anything after that
>>
>>84929221
Polygyny seems great on the surface but it means you have to deal with more female bullshit and scheming
>>
>>84929351
Chad destroy dozens to hundreds of future wives per year. Me taking off two out the market won't change the gynocentrism
>>
>>84929525
Horny, greedy fiend. You are an enemy of all lonely men. At least you know some restraint in only taking two extra wives but still do you really think you could give three wives as much love as they would've had if each had a man solely dedicated to them?

I get the fantasy
>>
>>84929525
>>84929640
but doing it irl is ebil
>>
I used to have a rotation and at a certain point, it's work. I would forget shit about men and their feelings would be hurt. It's not fun. A one man woman is what I have to be even though I love variety. I can't believe men that have other families. How are they not perpetually stressed?
>>
>>84929640
I mean two wives in total. I could handle three in the short term, but in the long term it'd be a pain
>>
>>84929663
You're dumb, that's a given since you're a woman and slut, but men and women aren't equals
>>
>>84929735
Uhhh we have the same amount of daytime regardless of sex. You are stretched thin and neglecting some shit with a harem or two families
>>
>>84929761
Again, you're retarded. Even explaining would be fruitless
Just don't think, you aren't fit for it
>>
>>84929863
Yeah right brother they call it balancing plates for a reason. Delusional larper just jealous I actually know what's up. I don't just type shit I live life
>>
>>84929525
This is one thing that I don't understand. A virgin guy who got two wives has done way less damage than the average normalgroid with 6-8 lifetime bodies. Not even mentioning the playboys in the high hundreds or even thousands
>>
>>84929875
First, don't call me brother, tramp.
Second, separated families and "rotations" aren't a harem. Of course it's going to take more time and stress because you're doing the same thing twice or more times, the effort that takes is like triple of a single relationship.

A harem is a unit. It takes more energy than a single relationship, but it's like 1.2-1.4x instead of double or more
>>
>>84929950
I can call you anything I damn well please partner
>muh harem definition
I'm sorry I didn't know you were autistic
>>
>>84929351
>for every additional girl in your harem there are counterfactual worlds where she finds a husband of her own to make happy, those guys now have to be single because of your greed.
Those guys probably suck anyway, they can deep throat a pistol about it.
>>
>>84929956
>caring about definitions is autism
Like I said, you're retarded, don't need to keep proving me right
>>
>>84929998
sorry anon but the foidlet is right, youre coping really hard. painful to watch
>>
Why do people can't separate what is good for society and what is good for yourself?

I love being unemployed, but if everyone were unemployed, society would fall in a day
>>
File: 1780934832516880.png (1.62 MB, 927x1401)
1.62 MB PNG
>>84929221
On the contrary, I believe that monogamy is terrible for society. It creates abusive, neurotic, and unstable families. It overburdens women and devalues men. Polygyny is the ideal family structure. I'm talking about a serious committed family with one man and no fucking around outside of it. No multiple family/cheating shit.
Polygyny benefits both the wives and the man well beyond what a monogamous family can provide. The girls get genuine female friends/sisters who they can actually trust and confide in, because they aren't competing, they're partners. They'll never feel lonely or isolated when their husband is away working or doing his hobbies. They don't have to worry that their man is lying or cheating, because he has lots of pussy at home. They get help with the kids and chores, reducing their daily tasks (for example one wife cooks while the other cleans) and even allowing them to take days or weeks off by asking their fellow wife to take care of things so that they can rest. They don't have to worry about satisfying their man's universally greater sexual appetite because they can rotate with their fellow wife. They get to have a larger family and more children. That larger anount of children will be able to provide increasing amounts of help with chores and eventually income for the family. Plus the fact that your husband has multiple women will subconsciously keep you attracted to him, because a man only having one woman signals to her that the man is low value.
Men get the natural ego/hormonal boost of having multiple women without needing to sneak around and cheat. They get more sex and children. They get more help around the house. The get a livelier yet more peaceful, less stressed house. They don't have to constantly pay attention or listen to their wives because the girls will keep eachother company.
Monogamy is only good for low sexual value men, but only in a society that enforces it. Modern society does not, so it's pointless now.
>>
>>84929221
Same. I once had three guys on rotation. I miss it.
>>
File: 20251121_165330.jpg (29 KB, 959x959)
29 KB JPG
Sluts, could you all stop giving your testimony? You're gross
>>
>>84929698
Still one too much, do wife swapping or something you horny dog.

>>84929974
That's just cruel, I bet you're a wuss who'd actually feel bad if they found out that happened.

>>84930372
Let's just assume for the sake of it that a family unit like that would work (though I have some serious doubts on the sex end, especially as the harem grows in size). What about the average guy? This would only benefit women and the best men.
>>
>>84929221
Polygamy is only bad if more than 10% women are having harems. And even many muslims countries have far lower rates
>>
>>84930631
*more than 10% of men
>>
>>84930572
Easy solution for balanced demographics:
One man
Two wives
One femboy slave
>>
>>84930840
This guy for president
>>
>>84930840
Great idea. Too bad Christian morality still dominates the right and the left is plain retarded. If Adolf won, we would probably have forced feminization of weak males starting in elementary school.
>>
Polygamy is like communism. Fine in theory if you ignore those it drives over. Awful in practice because humans are involved.
>>
I like how OP assumes he could get a harem of hot girls but is obviously completely clueless on how relationships work at a fundamental level.
"Polygamy" isn't even used by hideous normies, that's the Mormon word. Hideous normies say polyamory.
>>
File: 1781620061536476.png (221 KB, 329x585)
221 KB PNG
>>84930572
>What about the average guy?
What about them?

>>84931236
>>84931266
He said polygyny, not polygamy. Polygamy/polyamory is open relationship cuck shit. Polygyny is natural haremkeeping by one devoted man. It's what humans evolved to do.
>>
Polygamy would honestly be fine if everybody involved was up front and honest about it and the man actually has authority over AND responsibility for his wives. Maybe limit it to 3 wives or something, and no other man is responsible in any way directly or indirectly for another man's offspring of course
>>
>>84930372
Massive fucking truthnuke. Polygyny with two or three wives literally just makes things easier for everyone
>>84930572
>This would only benefit women and the best men.
As society and evolution have always directed towards anyways. This isn't an issue
>>84930840
holy. based.
finally a use case for faggots
>>
File: 1782411372654126.png (538 KB, 1381x1080)
538 KB PNG
>>84930840
>>84932311
If feminine/weak/submissive boys were sterilized and turned into a third sex whose purpose is to serve a real man and his wives it would certainly solve the excess/low value male issue. They get to be taken care of and live an easy life like a woman, they just can't ever pass their genes on and they have to let their master plap their boypussy if he wants. Alternatively I'm sure some men would have femboy-only harems, which would further decrease the amount of lonely men. The decision would have to be made around puberty, though, before they develop masculine features. It won't work if it's a bunch of troons.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.