What is the maximum number of partners you could accept your partner having? Answer without virtue signaling please. I'm a femanon and curious.
>>84951204Infinite. I don't care as long as she's loyal and monogamous after getting with me.
>>84951204fifty million minimum no maximum
3 max probably, depends on the circumstence obviously.
>>84951204>What is the maximum number of partners you could accept your partner having?0(zero)
>>84951204Well an older Chad and on told me it is an important thing to look out for the lower the better but I really don't care maybe I will learn to but it seems dumb too because less experience but at the same time I feel like there is a difference between hookups and relationships 10 hookups but two relationships is still a green flag but 10 relationships and two hookups is an on fire red flag
>>84951204Depends on the reasoning. Body count of 4 but they're all escorts? Garbage. Body count of 10 but they were genuine connections and not just lustful flings? Acceptable. I don't think highly of men who frequently hook up or pay for sex. It's better to stay celibate than give into your lust and fuck a random just to fulfill your "bodily needs". > t. another femanon
>>84951204it doesn't matter, as long as i'm the best. and not like "tee hee you're tooootally better than him" i mean it has to be obvious that i'm in a different league than any previous partners she had. if i can't win why bother playing
one dominant womanone submissive womanone submissive manme (autistic man)they must play yugioh with me.
>>84951204Zero. It might sound radical, but it's the only solution if you genuinely want your partner to be "pure", and stay religiously enamoured of you. It only takes one toxic long term relationship with "Chad" to ruin a decent woman basically forever. That doesn't mean they'd remain alone or deserve to, most men don't think the way I do. If you want an actually useful answer, I think the alarms of the average man won't go off inside their minds until like 3.
To wife? Like 5. But depends.More than 1 casual relationship, fwb or one night stand = not wife material. But 5 ex boyfriends is fine as long as it's clear she's over them.
Depends if I have the biggest penis she's ever had, if she had someone bigger I wouldn't date her at all no matter what.
Depending on the age, if it goes into the hundreds, there is probably something wrong with you.
>>849512041 without penetrative sex
>>84951204Up to one guy a year since her 18th birthday which is still way more than I'd prefer. In a perfect world it would be 1-3 men ever. Women my age that have been with 0 implies something is seriously wrong with them and men actively avoid her for a reason.
>>84951204I genuinely don't care as long as she doesn't make fun of me for not being good and willing to put up with an inexperienced virgin.I don't have or have a problem with women who have experience, I just am afraid they'd judge me.
If they aren't insane then it isn't a problem, but women who had a lot of partners are usually insane. They're either histronically insane, like loud and attention seeking or they are dark triad insane where they play secret tricks and skulk about and manipulate and pretend no one notices.
>>84951204AWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGA *dies* 0
>>849512040the only woman i'd marry is a debt-free virgin without tattoos who is agreeable and not a feminist
>>84951204>What is the maximum number of partners you could accept your partner having?You want me to answer your question, or what you're asking? Basically spirit of the question or letter of the question? In theory, lets say she's a perfect bombshell, she's rich, genuinely loves me, and lusts after me, let's me not work, and do what i want and for some reason she wants me i wouldn't care if she fucked all other guys on the planet. But realistically based on my interactions with people i wouldn't want my partner to be with more than 15-20 penis-havers, number of penis-lackers is completely irrelevant to me as they do not intrude upon my territory.
0any other answer and you're contributing to making society shittier, unless you're widowed
>>84951269>It only takes one toxic long term relationship with "Chad" to ruin a decent woman bluepilled takewomen call all exes "toxic" and the bigger question is why couldn't she keep Chad around? Chad is willing to lock down a good wife. stop believing foid stories about "toxic" men they fucked and cohabitated with for years
>>849512040Not a virtue to love a slut
>>84951419You don't know what the term "toxic" means, you just despise it because retarded women overuse it wrong.
>>84951204I'd like to say zero, but I understand this is pretty unrealistic so I would be willing to accept up to maybe 3, as long as none of them were long term and not hookups, friends with benefits, etc. At bare minimum she needs to have always been dating for long term/marriage and not "finding herself" or "enjoying her youth."I'm hoping(and coping) with the fact that I am religious might help filter for more marriage focused girls who are virgins but even with that I expect it to be difficult. It really is a shame that chastity and waiting for marriage isn't really respected at all in the modern age desu. I just want a wife that doesn't come pre-fucked that I can cherish for the rest of eternity.
>>84951433nobody knows what it means because it is an incredibly vague term devoid of meaning. it's a "snarl word" much like "incel"a woman i went on a few dates with called me toxic because i wouldn't order Doordash to her hotel roomanother one, a reddit feminist, called me toxic and a misogynist because i said if she expects full financial support then she should at least handle all domestic duties. >believe all women, chud!!absolutely not.
>>84951454That's exactly my point tho, you just know of it because retarded women use the term wrong. You use the word "toxic" on something that is bad for you. Not the "you're le hecking misogynist" bad, but actual, physical abuse, threatening to kill you bad. Not leaning to extremes, it can also refer to something as simple as a relationship where both of them fight more than they demonstrate love for each other, the man doesn't have to be at fault to consider it a toxic relationship. What I originally meant is that it takes a singular pos/apathetic to her guy to fuck up a woman that otherwise would have come up healthy.
>>84951204i just want to have sex why do females justify hypergamous behaviors?
>>84951438>as long as none of them were long term and not hookupsI meant to say>as long as all of them were long term*
>>84951204Honestly at this point I just give a fuck. I would date a bitch like Riley Reid or Mia Melano or Sweetie Fox(also there is no fucking way I'm and taller then her) as long as they don't cheat on me while we date. No Bonnie blue whore of Babylon tier shit though. Like fuck even my low standards have a floor and that bitch broken right down through it.Like I just want someone I can spend time with and dance with, really.>I'm a femanonBull shat until proven otherwise.
>>84951204ain't got a number, just a vibe. if i perceive she is absolutely ran through, it's a no-go. it also depends on the immediate connection and how much i like her. 5 could be a deal-breaker. 20 could not be a deal-breaker. ain't nothing.
>>84951487>both of them fight more than they demonstrate love for each otherwomen cause most of these fights. the ones who seethe about "toxic" men instigate shit, manipulate, lie, push the man to his breaking point, then call him an abuser when he finally screams at her and loses his shit.then they move on to the next one and repeat the cycle. these men tend to be docile betas who get psychologically abused. it's the same mechanism that creates mass shooters. think about how badly a mild-mannered nerd has to be abused in order to get to that point. they try the same tactics with Chad and either get ghosted or slammed into a wall. "Abusechads" are handsome men who get abused *by* women
>>849512043 is the maximum of what I would genuinely accept (but I am a virgin in my 30s, so almost as delusional as asking for a virgin).More than that, and I wouldn't be able to deal with it.
>>84951604>women cause most of these fightsThis, they'll seriously start fights just because they're bored or think it will lead to makeup sex. It's very frustrating.
>>84951204depends on what i want from her. if were just dating anything under 50 is okay. if i want to marry her its got to be less than 10.
>>84951204I have accepted a 20 year old who said she had a bodycount in the mid 30s.She was really hot, had a lovely personality, and the pussy was exquisite, though.
>>84951604Yeah but the ones you're describing are not the kind of women I'm referring to. Those are actually toxic women because again, the word isn't attached to men only, which is what you seem to think I'm saying. I can put a very blunt example to get my point across: A long term relationship with a man that puts on a facade of love to consistently get sex from a naive woman, even if she was a virgin prior to that, is all it takes to create the kind of woman I would not desire to have in my life. I will correct myself, it doesn't even have to be a toxic relationship, just a very intense relationship with a man she was deeply in love with but can't have anymore is enough to ruin her.
zeroI will not compromise
>>84951204Like someone I actually love? 0
>>84951669are you a woman? what is this drivel?>it doesn't even have to be a toxic relationship, just a very intense relationship with a man she was deeply in love with but can't have anymorewhat the fuck does this even mean?i'll provide my own example: i met a virgin who claimed to be in love with me. i tried for years to build a life with her. she turned out to be lazy as shit, constantly made various grandiose promises, didnt know what she wanted, lied constantly, didnt take accountability, and eventually morphed into her true form: an entitled arrogant gold digger who wanted me to do all the housework AND pay all the bills. i left her and she's been seething about it ever since. am i a bad man because i stopped tolerating a bitch who was trying to walk all over the man who gave her everything?
>>84951750>am i a bad man because i stopped tolerating a bitch who was trying to walk all over the man who gave her everything?No, you've just been the target of soulless gold diggers throughout your life apparently. The way you're attaching your personal experiences to everything I'm saying makes you sound more like an emotional woman than a rational, objective man. >what the fuck does this even mean?Exactly how it reads. Picture it: She meets the love of her life, physically attractive, handsome face, tall, full head of hair, deep masculine voice, charismatic, warm, has his shit together. She needs him, he's the perfect man for her or some shit like that. He doesn't feel the same way, but still accepts her offer because he wants her pussy and she seems fun to hang around with. Maybe months go by, he decides she's not for him and gets tired of her, says to her "it's not working", leaves. There you go, your woman has been successfully downgraded to broken mess that will probably slut herself to cope and fill the void.
>>84951204Zero? I do hope there are still people my age (20) that haven't had sex yet But realistically the cutoff is 5-8
>>84951204You lose a point for each previous partner you had, so if for example you would be a 7/10 but you had three previous partners then in my eyes you're a 4/10 and not really worth my time.
>>84951204zeromaybe one if i ever hire a prostitutei am content to die alone and so i feel no reason to settle, but if she lied to me about her bodycount and took it to her grave i also really would not care.
>>84951850So a 10/10 with 10 partners is a 0/10 for you?
>>84951788>No, you've just been the target of soulless gold diggers throughout your life apparently.I do believe that she loved me, and she was loving at the beginning. Maybe she got brainwashed by Tiktok. She was good and submissive for a while, then the feminism reared its ugly head. I simply couldn't make it work since she wanted me to be a betabux slave while she pretended to be a rich housewife. >has his shit togetherThe big question is whether she has her shit together. Women used to be trained to be good wives, you know. These days women are told all about what they should expect from a man, but nothing about what a man can expect from them. >your woman has been successfully downgraded to broken messMine probably has. But she was also a broken mess when I found her. She's just worse now. But I did take her virginity and did offer marriage in good faith. If a woman is truly wife material, Chad won't leave her and neither would I. But these women end up getting dropped because they make for horrible companions. There are so many women like this pretending to be good women.
>>84951850Agree with this one. Ill be more generous and say 2 partners is minus 1 point.
>>84951204is she 18-25? zero.older than 25? 1-2. plus one for every decade after 40.
>>84951941Well, the way I see it, we agree on a fundamental level. We just disagree on some random semantics. But we're on the same page here. Can't deny anything you said here.
>>849512040. I have 0 myself so it's only fair.
>>84951934>So a 10/10 with 10 partners is a 0/10 for you?Exactly.
>>84951204I'm old wurstie trash with a body count as high as my age, so I really can't judge. I may as well say infinite. At this point I just want her younger than 30. Women my age and older have no sex appeal.
>>84951204technically I would be willing to date a literal retired prostitute but practically anything more than 2 is bad and more than 0 is suboptimal
>>84951204Why should I give a fuck? It's a situation I will never have the opportunity of deciding in real life anyway so it's pointless to engage in hypothetical scenarios of extreme fiction. Female companionship is simply a side-quest that is not meant for some men. Other men will never eat saffron or durian fruit in their lives. Other men will never go skydiving or hiking mt everest in their lives. That's just how it is.
Once you get past 0-30 KDA, they are getting paid for that. Or they are a psycho. So you have that to contend with
>>84951204dunno if this thread or dead or not. but maybe 40 or 50?I kinda came to the realization lately that the more reserved women I've been with were the meanest and the most slutty ones were the nicest to me. so I think if anything, if I get another girlfriend or another woman wants to be with me. I don't think I care, as long as she's nice to me.
>>84951204i don't knowas long as she's not a whore it's fine
>>84951204Anything above 3 is not worth trusting.
>>84951204I don't care about partner count at all, I just care that she:1. Won't make me have sex with her2. Will be sexually open and slutty with other people3. Won't try to turn it into some sort of weird cuck fetish sort of thing (many people act like any polyamory is "cuck fetish" shit, but that's just one type of polyamory and not the sort of thing I have any desire to be involved with)She could have huge amounts of partners and I wouldn't be bothered at all. Women just like the conservative chad guys who actually do give a shit about partner count, not guys like me who aren't judgemental
>>84951204>What is the maximum number of partners you could accept your partner having?If you like each other numbers like that are irrelevant
