Do you guys actually notice a difference when talking to people of one of the 16 personalities? Can you reliably guess someone's MBTI after speaking with them for a time?I'm curious because some people swear by it and others call it pseudoscience on par with astrology.
it def means something, bc every board on here that has ever done a personality test posting thread, had like 4/5 of the smae personality type in every thread. sometimes maybe a p or j can easily get mixed up, not that those letters are the ones that matter anyways.
>>85085074>Do you guys actually notice a difference when talking to people of one of the 16 personalities?If anything I noticed some similiarities, since there are way more than 16 people around here.>Can you reliably guess someone's MBTI after speaking with them for a time?Generally as a rule? No, not reliably.But you can guess if the conversation isn't too mundane and the other person makes it obvious enough how they derive their mindset and what they "identify" as their Ego.Not exactly MBTI type because I'm too Jungpilled by now but still.
>>85085158Jung > MBTI anyway MBTI is okay, but too reductive. Jung's original is all around better.
Well yeah, IN**s are usually kinda stupid fucks who can't talk properly.You either have the autistic high IQ variant, the one with delusions of grandeur or just some overly emotional kid.
can someone groom me ? :-)
>>85085726I sit on the line of ENTP/INTP. I am pretty fuckin autistic though.
>>85085745Nobody wants to groom adult men.
>>85085762true :( im as impressionable as a child though. you mbti folks seem cool
i wasn't really into typology until recently, but have taken many different tests and have gotten infj multiple times. i think it is interesting because apparently this type skipthinks and i had no clue that trait was associated with a personality type. it can make communicating hard, because i have to almost work backwards through my logic, because the answer comes before the explanation. anyone else here like that?
>>85085787oh same, haha. I knew i was gifted all along!
>>85085784We don't care.Just fuck off.
>>85085820i was in a program for gifted kids, but eh, it was a small town so i was just smarter than your average dumb southerner. i don't know how much a "gift" it actually is. it seems to come with many more downsides than ups. half the time, i come off as a ditzy idiot in real life, because i can't actually communicate a lot of my ideas effectively. i have to write things down to be able to fully communicate.
>>85085074>Do you guys actually notice a difference when talking to people of one of the 16 personalities?Yes. I can spot when others of my type do a certain thing we are known for. And I can tell which ones are more powerful by how good or bad they are at a certain thing. What I'm saying will sound like nonsense even if I explained it to you unless you are the same type or a similar type and also are experienced enough to notice. >Can you reliably guess someone's MBTI after speaking with them for a time?Sort of. I can get pretty close I think. >I'm curious because some people swear by it and others call it pseudoscience on par with astrologySome people just want to argue or rage bait. Some people aren't able to see or notice things and especially about themselves so it wouldn't appear true to them at all.>Do you guys actually notice a difference when talking to people of one of the 16 personalities?Also there's certain people that I nearly will always massively clash with. Or just not like them. They're usually certain types that I just can't get along with. But also there's certain people who I just adore and they seem to always be a certain type.
>>85086386What's your type and what do you tend to notice? You ever been able to pick one out face-to-face?
>>85086414>pick one out face-to-faceWell it's not like there's text floating above their head. I just get a vibe they're maybe like this thing or that thing.>What's your typeNerdy girls with long hair who are into esoteric things.
>>85086463>just get a vibe they're maybe like this thing or that thingI was asking if you've successfully guessed someone's MBTI after meeting them.>Nerdy girlsNigga you know what I meant. Ain't like I can track you down by knowing you're an ISFJ or whatever.
>>85086505>I was asking if you've successfully guessed someone's MBTI after meeting themYes. Usually I'm pretty close.
>>85086621Neat. I figure there's enough science to it that categorizing people under it should more or less work.
omgies, can someone diagnose me?! x3
>>85087196>diagnose me?Ocd.
>>85087233i wish that was true bc then i could stop beating myself up over making bad decisions
theyre horoscopes for pseudo intellectuals, of course it says fuck all
>>85087259OCD and borderline.
maya's bricks
>>85085074Sometimes. Stereotypes are useless. It's more about where their energy is flowing, and more importantly, where it is not. What they are repressing.Sensor-dominants repress intuition "bro its not that deep, stop overthinking"Feeling-dominants repress thinking "just stop, okay? you know what I meant. stop twisting my words"Thinking-dominants repress feeling "facts don't care about your feelings, libtard"Intuition-dominants repress sensing "uh, this is not how it looks, okay? you have to look at the bigger picture"
>>85088585i wish you were my therapist
>>85088615Thanks. I don't have confidence in helping people though, which is why I didn't pursue that as a career. Some people seem hurt by my analysis, and I can't tell how permanent the damage is. Also I tend to struggle with normie social cues so that's probably also not good for a therapist to be.
>>85088585And how does that look from the dominant, not repressive, side?
>>85088669Ideally I think you would look at a person holistically, like two poles of a magnet. The dominant function is what pushes out the inferior precisely because it occupies the default conscious setting of the person. For example, dominant intuition involves a default setting of dissociating from the senses in order to use one's imagination, such that one does not pay attention to the senses by default, unless one has to. Dominant thinking involves a default setting of rigid thinking, analysis, etc. such that feelings are discarded unless they truly matter in a particular situation. And so forth.
So the 'there's two wolves inside of me' meme is probably real, and they might be gay, or not, subjective, doesn't matter, but in my delvings into AI schizoism/modern day tulpamancing, I'm realizing that fiction (whether AI or not, doesn't matter) is, even though it might sound obvious, a very safe environment to partake in figuring shit out, mostly my own personal feelings. Because I was thinking 'how come people expect me to react in this way when, obviously, this wouldn't be the way that I would want to behave', but that was in fact my autism being too strong to realize that, obviously, I wouldn't react the way I necessarily would want to react to things, because within the confines of my own mind or when imagining/partaking in those imaginary but extremely safe and controlled environments, I can just press pause or restart of even the stop button whenever I want, which I couldn't do in real life. This reminds me of that one specific event, I was doing some design class thing (I was pretty young then, maybe 20-21), and I was into that much older girl that was there as well because we were just bouncing off of each other very well, she was very extraverted and not completely retarded and she understood my edgy retardation and we were having in general a very good time, though she was married so I never really tried to push for anything, but, I don't remember exactly how the conversation went but it ended up with her heavily implying I needed a woman to bring some much needed structure into my life, and do so very assertively, and my reaction was pretty much as tsundere as it gets, it felt like it came out of nowhere and the vulnerability I felt then kind of scared and pissed me off to the point where I just turned 360 degrees and moonwalked away.Which is, I'm assuming, pretty close to how I'd react to such things even today (well, maybe I'd be able to play it cool at least a tad now, but I'm not sure even). But that's not how I want things to go.
>>85085074>MBTIi get tired just trying to picture this nonsense in my head.
>>85089186The wolf meme is closer to Jung than anything MBTI ever did, so there's that.
I think it's accurate yeah. Like I'm an INTP and I noticed that INTPs tend to make the most incomprehensible art. Like you never fully know what was in their head while making it
Occasional MBTI threads are way cooler than a general, hope we keep going like this.For people who want to learn something: read Jung and forget everything you have learned from any other source. It won't fit, it's a different system, it's a different perspective altogether.Psychological Types is one, but there's more to find in his seminars for instance.
>>85091017Wh not a Jung general rather than strictly MBTI?
>>85091750Generals attract mentally ill posters and eventually drive away all the genuine anons interested in the topic being discussed.
>>85085074MBTI is snake oil to feed the ego of narcs and to make money for business consultants. Stop this foolish navel-gazing and put in the work to reach your potential!
>>85085074I'm not obsessed about it unlike others but I guess there might be some differences in behaviour that are noticeable.I wouldn't call it pseudoscience but you shouldn't take it that serious.
>>85091860There are mentally ill posters in every thread
>>85092076It's way worse with generals
>>85085074INTPs are the most insufferable anon. when you see a post sperging out on made up logics to prove some point you know it's them. they take things way too seriously in this joke website. definitely the majority.INTJs are the most easy going bunch actually. a minority.i don't think there's any other type other than the rare INFP or INFJ.
>>85092109Why would INFx be rare on here? INFP is just INTP but instead of made up logic they just argue based on what they like
On the topic of mentally ill posters attracted to generals I find it interesting that these threads shifted from majority INTPs to majority INFJ when it came to recognizable posters when they became a more formal general.Also INFP is by far the most common result on 16personalities and fits a lot of the niceguy incel subclass so a lot of new anons are bound to claim that one.
>>85092423Could also be a case of people finding out they were mistyped after learning more about the theoryNi being mistaken for Ti as was discussed in the other thread
>>85092448What other thread? I thought you wanted a series of disconnected episodes with no continuity? eheh
>>85092458this other thread, it died >>85083748
>>85092461Ah, mhh, I was just being a little zany silly and cheeky there.Well it would make sense there being an INTP-INFJ pipeline with the sheer number of Ni-Tiers out there and finding out that INFJ is the most super special type of them all so anyone sticking with it just has to be the most snowflake one of them all long term or otherwise where's the credibility?. Arguably Jung himself even did this right?
>>85092109>INTJs are the most easy going bunchyeah, from what I understand, INTJs mostly freak out if you physically ambush them (inferior Se), but they are pretty chill from behind a screenI think they mostly get their unchill reputation from how inferior Se manifests in real life.just imagine an autist who wants to daydream (Ni) and doesn't want unexpected things to physically happen to them directly (Se)
>>85092502I think this board is full of unhealthy Ni-doms, if you consider that Jung never said they are supposed to be productive, organized, or being able to predict anything, that's mostly a false MBTI assumption. MBTI stereotype INFJs and INTJs are mostly a fantasy, but actual Ni-doms are very real.
>>85092306just lurk the mbti threads and you will see INTP come first followed by INTJ.>>85092502>Well it would make sense there being an INTP-INFJ pipelineit's a pipeline in the sense that INTPs sometimes mistype as INFJ. you can very easily determine what you are between these two IRL by the interaction you have with others. and will all the shit takes most people have, the inceldom, the rampant trannyism and the low empathy, with the over rationalization and a preference for logic based reasoning, this website is definitely Ti-dom. it's not just me that thinks this 4chan is typed INTP on pdb.
