Give me ONE reason why we shouldn't just send all incels and ugly men to die in wars?
One of those guys could be your future husband that would treat you like a queen and make you feel special and loved because you are the most important person in his life he has grown a deep connection with
>>85098973Usually, the governments that control you want to win the wars they start, so they send the strong and healthy men.
>>85098973Send ugly women too
>>85098973If all of them die then Chads aren't Chads anymore. The market needs merchandise from all kinds so the good one stands out. If it doesn't, then no one cares.
>>85098973Wars kill more civilians than soldiers. It's actually safer to be a soldier in a modern conflict than it is to be a woman or child and that's not counting the rapes.https://civiliansinconflict.org/our-work/conflict-trends/urban-warfare/>modern urban conflicts often result in civilian fatalities outnumbering combatants
>>85099000How much of that is skewed by Gaza and African niggers massacring civilians willy nilly?
>>85098981Not because theyre ugly and have shit genes. Hence the draft. Its basically natural selection and helps us get rid of undesirable men and overall genetic garbage>>85098983No such thing as an ugly woman
>>85099041You shouldn't talk about your future husband and the future father of your children that way. Chad's affection is fleeting and is as superficial as what's going on in his mind. You deserve true love.
>>85099000So your only concern is that civilians remain safe? Incels should be massacred in a remote location?
>>85098973If you are gonna keep reposting this at least make it fresh, talk about different things in war, don't get me wrong I like your bait but come on, lets spice things up
>>85099095True love can only be given by attractive men, apex males. Not surplus males
>>85099031https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratioThere is a wikipedia article, lowest rate is Ukraine Russia but that's mostly because the war is in the woods but it's still 26% and not over yet. >>85099108No i was pointing out that OP's idea that war would only kill incels is retarded. I don't think anyone should be killed.
>>85099123pretty much this. if there was another major war, women would probably suffer more in aggregate (not a big deal). a far worse consequence of war than women's suffering would be massive, permanent ecological damage that a large scale modern war would entail.
>>85098981Yea bro and the toothfairy is real
>>85098973We don't die in wars. We just spread our genes.
>>85099130Just send all uggos to fights and die somewhere with noone like in the desert or something
>>85098973your post is pretty based, further making men realize women are their enemy and accelerating inevitable loss of all womans rights
>>85099160>Just send all uggos to fights and die somewhere with noone like in the desert or somethingIf you sent a bunch of dudes in an empty place, why would they kill each others ?
>>85098973we have feelings tooIMAGINE IF ONE DAY YOU BECAME WORTHLESS (not saying I am, but I think this will help you emphasize with me)
>>85098973> Give me ONE reason why we shouldn't just send all incels and ugly men to die in wars?Probably the simplest reason is that incels are the men who cares the least, and we are not some biorobot that you could just send somewhere like an automaton. Why should we fight for whores that arent ours, lands that we dont own, if the whores arent ours then their bastards either, so this is not our future either, why should we fight for any of this crap when it will be better to just betray you and throw you under the bus.
>>85098973If there's a war, then women are getting mass raped and murdered. I don't think this is the play you don't it is.
>>85099160did that in Iraq, 67% of causalities were still civilians lol. Next war should be in America because nobody cares if Americans die.
Modern war isn't eugenic whatsoever. Skilled fighters don't have a higher survival rate than retards. Soldiers just get randomly blown up by a drone and that's the end of their bloodline.
>>85098973Having a large class of men skilled with violence and accustomed to killing is pretty much the biggest problem humanity has been dealing with since the beginning of time.
It worked out pretty well for Ukraine. Harassment, SA and all kind of abuse women are subjected to at the hands of men have dropped double digits. Maybe it is the way forward.
>>85099504Since they ran out of men all of that shit will spike, after the Russian soldiers get inside, literally lol, whores getting what they deserve.
>>85099523Russia is losing though so Ukrainian women are safe.
>>85099504Exactly since men are responsible for all crimes (especially the ugly ones) sending them to die in a trench would solve most of society issues
>>85099504>It worked out pretty well for UkraineWhy don't you move there then ?
>>85099504>Harassment, SA and all kind of abuse women are subjected to at the hands of men have dropped double digits. Maybe it is the way forward.All of that would also disappear if we sent foids to the frontlines instead, so why not do that ?
a high female to male ratio society would actually be extremely ideal for incels actually. the higher the ratio the more ideal it becomes. youd have to eliminate every last male down to the last man before you werent just making an incel paradise.
>>85099504>Harassment, SA and all kind of abuse women are subjected to at the hands of men have dropped double digits. Maybe it is the way forward.>It is estimated that 30% to 40% of all prime child-bearing-age Ukrainian women (typically categorized as ages up to 44) have fled the country and are living abroad as refugees.I'm seeing Ukrainian women showing up on the escort sites and massage parlors now
>>85099632what does Ukrainian women being self-employed have to do with anything I just said?
>>85098973Because all you'd get are a bunch of deserters. The men you send to war are either mercenaries or people who have something to fight for.You ever heard of a thing called morale? You think incels are high in morale?
