They have lolcow and CC. We don't need or want them here. If they hate men (the non-Chad men, that is) so much, they can fuck right off. This is an incel safe space
>>85101191CC is dead and lolcow is for bullies
>>85101240who cares? this board isn't for them. i propose that anyone who advertises the fact that they're a foid should be banned immediately. its working to keep the cassie spam at bay. let's expand that to include every foid.
>>85101250So it's fine if gender is not announced?
>>85101191>>85101264i think it would be a good rule to, unless it's an interesting topic, ban this cuck femanon crisis by marking it as spam to mention being a "nona" umprompted
>>85101191get them all out, cassie, chickn, miyoko, all lolcow attention whores.
I propose a blanket incel ban. The celibate would not be prohibited from posting, but any hint of extremist incel ideology or affiliation would be a bannable offense. Gookmoot really needs to take steps to keep this place from creating any more mass shooters.
>>85101250Agreed holy shit I get a cortisol spike everytime I see a foid identifying themself on this board
>>85101191you cant stop meh
>>85101240>CC is deadIt would be more alive if they were banned from here so they'd post there.
>>85101240>CC is dead and lolcow is for bullieswhat about reddit or Tumblr? what happened to them?
I don't give a fuck about about the whores who mostly just lurk or pose as male anyway, but I wish all the those gigahorny niggerbrained simps got perma'd. All those mental indians who think this board is their dating app. If your post/thread has the word "femanon" or "fembot" in it the post should error out in an ip ban
>>85101191i dont hate men tho. you guys are kinda cute, except for the part where youre all pedophiles ^^
>>85101457Liking 16yo girls is not being "pedo" you dumb whore, it's literally a basic biology. Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, it works like this in every species except in case of humans where both puritans and feminists alike brand you a "pedo" for finding sexually developed girls attractive.
>>85101487twelve year olds have their periods too. you know what most of them also have? baby teeth. seek help
>>85101497Most twelve year olds don't have developed sexual features (hips, boobs etc) yet. There is a reason why fucking 15-16 you in most of European countries is legal.Do you think you're smarter than European lawmakers?
>>85101514> Do you think you're smarter than European lawmakers?yes, but thats not a very high benchmark. im european myself. i dont think 16 is that bad, though its certainly weird to date someone who still has to do their english homework every night. I dont think its pedophilia, i think its a weird age gap.i do think most men would go younger if they could. thats sick. look at Epstein island. the whole sexually developed argument is bs. most men would fuck a twelve year old, by that logic, because many of them do have boobs and their periods. its an excuse
>>85101550>most men would fuck a twelve year oldI highly disagree, for the very reason I've mentioned before: men are primarily attracted to sexual features (hips, boobs etc). And for a good (and obvious) reason - our hormones tell us to pass on our genes. So no, most men are not pedophiles. There undoubtedly are fuckers who want to have sex with kids, just like there are sick women attracted to shotas - yes sexual deviations are a thing. It doesn't mean that all men are like this and it is not reserved exclusively to one sex.Personally, I do find 16-19 yos most attractive (physically), but that doesn't mean I'd date them or try to fuck them, it's just a fact. My monkey brain tells me to breed with the young and healthy specimens. It doesn't mean I will actually listen to my monkey brain.
>>85101191nah, ban all incels instead
>>85101647ThisWomen are our best posters. The namefags mentioned here are homosexual men so just ban namefags/tripfags/avatarfags instead
>>85101550nta, but the issue is the loss of actual courtship and the whorification of women (because lets be honest, 16 year old guys aren't having anywhere near the amount of sex as girls).In decades past, it was normal to start the courtship or dating process with a ~10yr age gap, because the guy on his way to becoming experienced and established, and was indicating to her/her family "I can protect and provide for her." But they (mostly) weren't having sex, and the guy knew he wasn't dating a run through whore with double digit partners by 18.And now, women are having sex earlier and more often. partly due to culture, partly puberty starting earlier, so women's own actions are driving that age down.
>>85101191/r9k/ is a random board
>>85101299I just find it funny when r9k complains about me or complains about any other r9k femanon, you guys worship Sems and are nice to her so stop complaining. I hate comparing myself to other women but she's the only example i can think of. Tldr - you guys complain about r9k e-girls and then turn around and post actively on sems thread Just stop lying to yourselves and admit you love it when femanons post
>>85101191go use the incel forum you fucking faggot. this place was so much better before you redditfugees flooded the place.
>>85101598if thats the case, explain why there are whole countries where you can legally marry nine year olds, and how shit like Epstein island are as successful as it was>>85101693look at gen z sex statistics. gen is having far less sex and sex far later than even the boomer generation, that was supposedly so traditional. to say that women are just having sex way more and at way younger ages now is just statistically false. if anything, gen z men and women are fucking significantly less than the past three generations before us
>>85101864Because Arabs and Muzzies in general are human scum? I can't recall that ever being a case in European culture ever, even in tribal societies.
>>85101864>>85101963Oh and as for the Epstein Island - you really compare a degenerate billionaire to an average Joe? I mean yeah there are poor fuckers diddling their kids and all alright, bur again that doesn't mean every man is into that shit. Why are you projecting so hard?
>>85101864>gen z sex statistics a lot of that data doesn't do a good job of separating 1 partner vs multiple, they just look at "sex, y/n?". And the bigger issue is it relies on self reporting. And I guess I should have said "several decades past," because I wouldn't consider boomers past the 60s as traditional.>to say that women are just having sex way more and at way younger ages now is just statistically false. if anything, gen z men and women are fucking significantly less than the past three generationsThose two statements aren't incongruent. Yes gen z is less sexed than boomers, but within gen z more girls are having sex than guys. And with greater variation of partners.I'm actually a millennial (well, zillennial but whatever) and it is obvious to see the difference in sexual behavior between 12/13 year olds from then, to gen z, to gen alpha right now.
Would this girl be allowed on r9k?
>>85101191i dont hate anyone though <:3
>>85101749His threads barely get 20 replies now, we want both of you to get murdered asap
>>85101250Nah there's decent foids here. I can think of at least 2 former egirls that are way better people than Cassie and whoever the hell else currently hangs around this board
>>85102874I too love Turbie from /mbti/
>>85102874no fuck off. foids have every other board on this site that they can use. r9k is for robots ONLY
>>85101191I only come in every now and then when the main catalog isn't dirty and you all are talking about something interesting
>>85104337oops I got it wrong and wanted to post this pic but whatever
