[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1729719876987224.jpg (1.68 MB, 3150x3700)
1.68 MB JPG
They raised the age of content in my country from 16 to 18.

People started rationalizing the decision cope-ily even though I cant remember anyone having had a problem with 16. I was called a paedo for being against it.
You do realize they'll keep bumping it up indefinitely, right? 18 is just the start.
Women's rights are a thing that can only increase over time. They'll never just stop and go "I think we have enough."

>yeah but we need to protect children
From what? They host Pride parades for children. You don't care. They have sex education in school. You don't care. Tiktok has destroyed children's minds for good. You don't care.
Most 13-year-olds have already had sex. You don't care, because they were the same age. To me, it almost looks as if the age of content exists only to prevent 18-20yo incel males from getting a second chance at relationships. I mean what biological or psychological study supports the claim that a 16yo girl gets permanently scarred from dating a shy 19yo incel? inb4 "paedo" Bro the age gap is 3 years you fucking moron and women mature earlier anyway, both mentally and physically - especially mentally.
>>
i dunno anon, why dont you have a conversation here about it so you can feel youre implicating people in pedophilia
>>
I think you fundamentally misunderstand what Age of Consent means. It's not supposed to be 'you can start fucking anyone now' (even if it functional is). It has more to do with the sense that you are voluntarily consenting to the trappings of adult life. Sex is really a small part of it. If you don't consent to the little things, then you will start to be treated like a prude do ne'er do well who does not want to be a useful participant in society. By and large, the incels you are referring to do not consent to society's demands, and as a result they are treated like children who are to be fucked.
>>
>>85108801
Why are 4-year-olds allowed to have smartphones and watch brainrot all day?

I've been asking this for 10 years and nobody ever tells me why it's legal, acceptable and allowed
>>
>women le mature mentally
typical woman woman's a retarded pissant at age 55
>>
>>85108897
If women are dumb at any age, why not lower the age of consent then?
>>
why are countries tightening all their sex laws all of a sudden?

France just passed a law that you get life imprisonment for repeated sex with a minor
>>
>>85108899
because ugly old women engage more in politics than you, so you will eat their shit, I guess? I'm too old to care about this bullshit, anyways. Watching sub-sapient normalgroids get more and more boxed in by the new globohomo inquisition is just funny to me, at this point.
>>
btw consensual sex with a minor is also considered rape by the law. so basically a 18yo guy could get a life sentence for being in a mutually consensual relationship with a teenager

they call it "rape" so they could pass these laws, and they change the very definition of rape afterwards
>>
>>85108936
WEF edict, unironically. These big international ideologies like neoliberalism finally developed decision centers and those now push for policies across the world, in a wave
>>
>>85108961
I dont get it though.
They're saying that women have absolute right and jurisdiction over their own body. But they also say a teenager cannot consent to sex?
These are contradictory ideas to me.
>>
>>85108967
Men are evil and elite lib men are super-double-good for fucking with you, putting you in chains. That's the main thrust, rest is window dressing.
>>
>>85108782
>You do realize they'll keep bumping it up indefinitely, right?
No they won't
If they keep bump it it would the people older than 18 would be capable of getting with those younger and it would lose purpose
>>
File: HMtDhzTWcAA0FIR.jpg (578 KB, 824x941)
578 KB JPG
As an incel I think the age of consent should be 25 with no age proximity excuses and heavy prison sentences
>>
Why does society think sex is the most harmful thing in life?
>>
The law considers 17-year-olds "children" just as 4-year-olds.

I can't believe it. You get the same punishment for sex with either one?
>>
They're trying to ban straight sex altogether, for people of any age.
"Protecting minors" is just the first step because it's easy to get behind. It sounds logical.
But then they start slippery sloping the very definitions of words: what it means to be a "child", what "rape" means, and so on.

I'm IQ 140 so I see this, you guys don't.

>why would they do this? society is hypersexual and I see sex advertised everywhere. so why would they make sex a taboo?
Because that makes it easier for them to sell products related to sexuality.
You wont pay for onlyfans and porn if you have a 5/5 woman at home that you can fuck.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.