I just spitballed some solutions to the birth rate problems that the entire developed world faces, I don't endorse all these ideas or think their good, just wanna hear what you guys think about what the developed world will have to do. >Use AI to replace the lost work force (if the technology is created in time)>Give women insane financial incentives to have kids (full-time competitive salaries on par with white collar jobs, just for bearing and raising a child)>Mass immigration of young Indians to replace the lost population (the current plan for the west)>Mandatory gender-selective deportations or imprisonments. Remove the bottom rung of men (10%) who are unable to find a partner (trucels), this will change gender dynamics in favour of men having power of women socially. This may lead to an increase in children as men will now have more leverage in relationships, and can pressure women for kids>Create a specific childless tax for those without children past a certain age >Forced religious indoctrination for everyone (More religous nations have higher birth rates, even devloped ones (Israel))>Government-assigned partners (Gov assigns a man and woman together based on certain criteria like appearance, wealth, personality scores, intelligence, life desires, etc, and forces them into a room for 2 weeks until they get along. It's kinda like how when you have 2 kids fighting, you make them sit together until they learn to get along.>Force city dwellers out of cities and into rural towns>Revoke most women's rights, reverse financial freedom for women, remove gender-based uni programs and scholarships.What do robots think about my ideas. I wish I controlled the entire universe I think I would make this place really cool.
>>85260380Or we could just clone a bunch with good genetics just make a bunch of like designer babies in a lab
>>85260380I dont know. As a single man id obiviously never support alot of this things since they effect me negetively. I have no issue with AI or revoking womans rights though as they likely the least to effect me. The first thing would require UBI though.
>>85260380this was all solved 70 years ago
>>85260394Is that financially or scientifically feasible for an entire population? That would be awesome.>>85260404True, I think a lot of solutions just come down to whether the Gov is willing to pay billions of dollars to attempt to fix the problem, or just important a bunch of immigrants and kick the can down the road. For that reason I don't think UBI is likely to happen anytime soon.
>>85260380>Give women insane financial incentives to have kids (full-time competitive salaries on par with white collar jobs, just for bearing and raising a child)The whole reason birth rates tanked is that we empowered women financially.
>>85260380>>Mass immigration of young Indians to replace the lost population KYS Shit like this is literally some of the main reasons why wages are low, housing is more expensive, which makes it harder for us to afford families and not have children.
>>85260430It's definitely possiblee ethics just getting away but financially feasible though probably as well yeah I could see it being cheap if it's deemedI think the real questions come in How do we guarantee it a good lifeWho raises it Who's responsibility is it What would it think about itself would it think it's apparent would it think it's a clone would it think it's a human being How much differentiation would we add would we make all the races What would the standard male and female look like Should have the personal decision to be allowed to commit suicideWould all diseases be eradicated What would happen if something goes wrong for it like say it gets really fucked up messed up life or something then what
>>85260380Sterilization of every non-white is the only solution.
>>85260465Issue with with coloning is they are all the same gene, all it takes is one kind of virus or whatever to be effective to wipe it all out since they all have the same genes. Kinda like vilturmite situation...
>>85260380>Give women insane financial incentives to have kids (full-time competitive salaries on par with white collar jobs, just for bearing and raising a child)Might fix the birth rate but would crater marriage rates. Women would just birth Chad's babies over and over again. Basically paying women to be concubines.>Create a specific childless tax for those without children past a certain ageThis functionally already exists just inversed. People with kids get thousands in tax breaks.>Force city dwellers out of cities and into rural townsChina already has a system that prevents people from moving from rural to urban places without permission and it doesn't do much good.The one thing that would actually work is banning any technology that was developed after ~2006. Stuff like smartphones, social media, and instagram are what sent hypergamy into overdrive.
>>85260443True I think that's probably the main factor, but what's the solution? You either have to give women incentives to choose child-rearing over chasing their career, or force them out of career chasing. But how do you proceed with that 2nd option in the political climate that the west is currently in?>>85260458Hey retard, read the first sentence in the thread. >I don't endorse all these ideas or think they're goodI don't want white societies to be replaced, but that is the only solution white societies are chasing.>>85260465Idk anything about this technology, but I imagine the creation will be just like a human in everything except origin, and in which case it should be treated the exact same way as all other humans. Who would raise him/her? I have no clue, maybe single fathers, because men are generally very willing to having kids. Actually, men probably will (reasonably) not want to have kids without the support of a woman, or the dynamic of a loving 2-parent household. Idk desu, this is all too complicated.>>85260522>This functionally already exists just inversed. People with kids get thousands in tax breaks. I think the fact that people don't lose money, but only lose the possibility of gaining more money, makes the tax much less effective. Losing money you worked for hurts more than not gaining money you could have possibly gotten.>China already has a system that prevents people from moving from rural to urban places without permission and it doesn't do much good.kek. China is always 3 steps ahead with crazy solutions, if they cant make it work idk wat do.>The one thing that would actually work is banning any technology that was developed after ~2006. Stuff like smartphones, social media, and instagram are what sent hypergamy into overdrive.Honestly, this would be good not just for birthrates and relationships, but for the large majority of the factors in someone's life that determines their happiness.
>>85260560Either way natural selection will do its thing. Only time will tell.
>>85260560I'm not arguing with you or bumping your retard thread again. There's already a BILLION fucking Indians in India. We don't need to import another billion to other places and have them end up as India too. kys
>>85260781Are you intellectually disabled? kek. Emotional ape who is unable to differentiate between prescriptive and descriptive statements. You are spiritually Indian.
