>watching youtube newslop>youtuber says "...and worse" with the word r*pe on the screen because of yt censors>okay he means rape>"and by 'and worse' i mean that r-word...we're not stupid. And this isn't TikTok. You should just say rape, but if you won't, we know what you're talking about.
>>85264659Youtube uses AI to analyze every word in a video and automatically shadow bans and demonetizes videos that don't follow their arbritary guidelines. You ever see how if a Youtuber says 'like' or 'subscribe' the respective button glows? They are analyzing the content of every single video, they can't say the actual word to avoid Youtube oppression.That's the real reason, they want to talk about rape but can't use the actual words. Soon they won't be able to once Youtube AI gets too advanced.
>>85264681>can't use the actual wordsThey can use the real words, but they want to make money. It's greed and laziness."Wah I can't say rape" Boo hoo idiot, get a real job like digging graves or sorting trash. Making videos for doomscrolling faglords is shitposting, which I do for free.
>>85264681I know the YT censor game... My hot take, if you do YouTube and your main revenue stream is from YouTube, you're a fool. And also, a lot of these YouTubers will complain about demonetization yet never diversify their income streams outside of sponsors. -.- Anyways my point was a lot of these "influencers" seem to assume their audience is TikTok.
>>85264717My hottest of takes... If someone is attempting to circumvent the filters, report them for that content specifically and try to get them demonetized, because fuck them.
>>85264708Sure, but your original line of reasoning was >but if you won't, we know what you're talking about.You're complaining about self-censorship, while they are trying to get a message across. >greed and lazinessYou are contributing by watching their video, and this is a new complaint altogether.>Making videos for doomscrolling faglords is shitposting, which I do for free.True>Boo hoo idiot, get a real job like digging graves or sorting trashIt's funny you mention that because those jobs are all filled, at least where I live. Turns out you don't need a massive workforce for that stuff, especially with automation. Modern bodies are either donated to science, and grave-digging is automated. As for sorting trash, that also happens to be largely automated.
>>85264730>he doesn't know that today's AI is Actually IndiansYour "automated" trash sorting system is illegal immigrants.
>>85264730Didn't see the non-tripfag and tripfag but same point still applies>>85264717>>85264728You retards are contributing to their foolishnessI actually wonder, how do you expect them to diversify their income streams outside of sponsors? Selling shirts? Because people complain about that a whole lot more.>>85264728I'd argue the filters are in place to oppress sensitive subjects, not actually keep people in line with the rules
>>85264741>how do you expect them to diversify their income streams outside of sponsorsHow about instead of being leeches on society they try https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Prize_Problems
>>85264746Good b8 posting this on 4chan lmfao>>85264738Not wrong, but you can take virtual tours of garbage processing sites. The bulk of work is automated, not that many workers are needed.
>>85264728How's the taste of Jewgle's cock in your mouth? The filters shouldn't exist to begin with.>>85264741>how do you expect them to diversify their income streams outside of sponsorsYouTube is not lucrative unless you have many subs and get a consistent amount of views. If you don't think of income outside of YouTube you are basically at the whim of YouTube's monetization system which often gets it wrong. So yeah, you are stupid if you choose youtube.com as your sole employer.
>>85264770>The filters shouldn't existAnd people who rely on the system that use them shouldn't exist either, but I can greatly annoy one party and slightly hinder the other. You can game a system that you hate. Doing so may perhaps even be a moral obligation.
>>85264750But to answer your question you should have a reliable income stream before going into youtube.
>>85264785They're not "gaming" the system. They're playing by its rules. The system itself is what encourages tiktok-esque influencers to be mickey mousey on serious topics. Legacy media is allowed to say rape. Online media isn't because of "muh kids" censorship slopaganda. The system itself is the problem and shouldn't exist.
>>85264806>he doesn't turn system rules against themselves to bring down the systemCome on, be more like me.
>>85264859If you think you can game youtube, you have a highly inflated sense of what you can do
>>85264904>can 4chan game youtube?Moot literally worked at google
