>>85267705
Not trans but I get worried about finding a husband

>>85267705
I can be your husband

>>85267712
what are you looking for in a partner? originally

Yeah it sucks but it is what it is

>>85267705
If you pass I might consider it.

>>85267705
you will only ever be a secret fwb.
wanna be mine?

>>85267734
>wants marriage and kids
>good boy, at least to me but ideally in general
>tall (5'11" minimum, 6'0"+ is nice)
>white (British or similar accent really helps)
>will be able to decide quickly after meeting up about whether he's committed
>able to make things work on the quicker side helps (for example, able to move to where I'm at; or already living in the usa and take me in as a roommate; or if staying abroad, willing to cover my bills while I find something -- I know the last one is a big ask, which is why I don't expect it, but it helps you stand out if you will)
>not turned off by pregnancy (with his own kid)

>>85268175
>>tall (5'11" minimum, 6'0"+ is nice)
aaaaaaaand into the bin it goes.

>>85267705
Why would I want to support another man? That's reserved for women, which you are not. You're a failed male.

>>85268178
I wish you luck anon. Plenty of women out there shorter than me.

>>85268202
>Plenty of women out there shorter than me.
your height has nothing to do with it. you just want a lanklet like all other women do, cause you're shallow.

>>85268175
you said your trans girl but you talk about pregnancy... what?
anyways a tall guy is going to get a real woman not some fetish object.
you have to go for sexually neglected short guys that are willing to overlook and/or fetishize your dick.
and a person who is lonely enough to not care about being seen with a tranner in public.

>>85268178
the bigger red flag imo is
>will be able to decide quickly after meeting up about whether he's committed
I get that happens sometimes, you find "the one" and instantly click, but looking for that specifically? Too much of a fairy tale pipedream
>>85268202
The issue isn't you want someone taller than you. It is that you list exact measurements, it makes it look less of a preference more of a status thing. It'd be like if dude said he was into big boobs, but only very specific dimensions and above, anything else is trash. Yes I'm sure there are some guys like that, but you would look down upon them too

>>85267705
Cool story man. Take it to >>>/lgbt/

File: IMG_1391.gif (1.89 MB, 640x382)

1.89 MB GIF

I literally cant wrap my head around how to manage waiting atleast 6 years as a wage slave to support people because literally nobody can hear me scream anymore

>>85267712
I am your husband(potential) please marry me please

>>85268225
Did you not follow the conversation thread? I'm not trans

>>85268268
There is nothing wrong with a height preference or a boob size preference. Plenty of guys have weight or waistline preferences already.
>status
I think some guys are kinda idiotic on this. It's a sexual attraction thing. It's not a status thing.
You want partners you're aroused by too. I guarantee you have some preferences whether they're racial, weight, waistline, ability/disability, etc. where your attraction is at stake.
>I get that happens sometimes, you find "the one" and instantly click, but looking for that specifically?
This has typically not been an issue for me, but it was with my last partner I met on 4chan. So, i realized I need to screen for that. Don't want to get brutally played again.
Men who are iffy about making you their girlfriend after you've been talking for a while and have met up / visited with each other aren't the ones you want.
It's not a massive ask, honestly the bar is kind of in hell for that one.

>>85268338
ah i see so you hijacked a trans womans thread.
typical woman behavior.

>>85267705
Not trans but 4chan is the ultimate place to find someone into trans women. There's an entire board that even gets called /tttt/, you have so many options with dating other trans girls, you can also bully libfem reddit normie women into dating you or else they're transphobic TERFs. The world is transgender women's oyster in 2026. If you don't have some 6 figure tech job or at the very least a partner that will support you being NEET, I have to wonder what you're even doing.
>t. cis femcel

>>85267705
>supporting someone that can't give you kids

>>85268338
>Men who are iffy about making you their girlfriend after you've been talking for a while
ok that makes more sense, I thought you were meaning from the first interaction. I agree with you on that then.
On the height/boob thing, yeah having a preference and sexual attraction is fine. but being hardline about a measurement comes off as superficial. Like I don't want a girl who is obese, but I'm not going to measure her waist and do weigh ins or whatever. You could have just said "tall" or "taller than me" and I wouldn't have questioned.

>>85268338
>I think some guys are kinda idiotic on this. It's a sexual attraction thing. It's not a status thing.
>I guarantee you have some preferences whether they're racial, weight, waistline, ability/disability, etc
I like a juicy ass and nice tits but my last girlfriend had neither and I loved her all the same. If I were to automatically filter out women by those criteria wouldn't have dated. That's why it's annoying. Men aren't putting "big tits and a fat ass" in their dating profiles as a requirement. Women do do stuff like that regularly.

>>85268429
If you specifically are turned off by mentioning measurements, that sounds more like a thing with you. I know you're not the only one, but I wouldn't be compatible with someone who doesn't like or vibe with specificity
>if you have just said "tall"
...
Being less specific just wastes more people's time and could uncessarily filter out some people. People don't universally agree what tall is. So some 6' guys might be like "oh no, I don't count, women want 6'5" now!" while a 5'10" guy living in Vietnam or California might think he's tall.
>being hardline about a measurement comes off as superficial
I have lived with my body my entire life. The chances that my attraction and compatibility will be high enough for marriage with a guy shorter than this are miniscule. Maybe like... A one in several billion type, and he'd have to be basically magical in all other areas. No point in leaving that open.
If a guy came out and said he won't accept bigger than a 23" wait, I understand that. I've also seen some guys have height preferences in women. None of these things are bad, and it's way better to be honest about what you want upfront.

I actually wish guys did this kind of thing more. It's probably part of why men are way more likely to cheat in marriages than women, because they settle for women they aren't that physically into when it would've been better for everyone for the guy to be honest to begin with. If he needs G cups, let him shoot for those, no pun intended.
Certain males on here are way less rational about stuff like this than women are.

>>85268498
>last girlfriend
No wonder it didn't work out. She wasn't your type to begin with.
>inb4 we broke up for another reason
A strong enough connection can make up for those things. I've left if a man doesn't love me enough and I can tell. (Even if he himself may not openly admit it.)
You shouldn't date outside your type unless they are willing to become that (require mature communication) or you are genuinely just as attracted sexually anyway. Otherwise it can and does affect the relationship
>Men aren't putting "big tits and a fat ass" in their dating profiles as a requirement.
If the guys who wanted this were honest, we'd have so much less heartache as women and as a society. Go for what you want, please, for the love of God, no need for there to be more failed relationships than there already are.

>>85268560
we broke up because she cheated on me dumb roastie.

>>85268531
>Certain males on here are way less rational about stuff like this than women are
IDK if it is rationality. I think it is how modern men and women view relationships. Men have a preference, but compromise (not settle) more readily if there is a connection. Women filter and disregard men outside of this ideal a lot more. And they can afford to, because the world is their oyster.

>>85268574
....
You're still not getting it. You not getting it is you being dumb.
Obviously I don't condone cheating. It's wrong and she should have just left you.
But the top reasons for women cheating are relationship dissatisfaction and a disengaged partner.
This is why I filter for guys who are sure about me and attracted to me sufficiently. I have never cheated, never will.
But this is the entire point: you created a relationship that was more likely to fail from the get-go when you should have gone the more honest route and it would've saved you both a lot of issues
>inb4 I never let her know
She could tell on some level.

It was fucked up of her to cheat. At the same time you can reduce your risk of ending up in that situation, just like you can reduce your chances of being victimized by crime.

>>85268601
It is settling if you're not sufficiently attracted to your partner, and it's wrong to do, because it affects your relationship and the quality of it, which in turn affects the model your kids will have etc..

Don't seriously date people you aren't that into. This applies to men and women, especially men (until the male adultery rate matches the female one)

>>85268616
lmao you are just so fucking stupid you have to be a troll
>if she had big tits and a big ass i would have loved her better and she wouldn't have cheated
is that essentially your position? god you know maybe the misogyny towards women nowadays is warranted.
you are just the most brain-dead idiot i've ever talked to.

>>85268616
btw she sent me multiple texts since the breakup about how i treated her so well and she feels so stupid and selfish for what she did. it was entirely on her you idiot.

>>85268653
>>if she had big tits and a big ass i would have loved her better and she wouldn't have cheated
Literally this is probably true. It's actually kind of amazing that you don't understand this?

Your attraction to your partner is a HUGE deal, especially as the male in the relationship. Women leave when we aren't loved or cherished enough. She probably initially figured she was your type, and then got confused when your behavior didn't align with that.

We are so tired of that. Men should just go for what they want or someone willing to get what they want (like if you offer her a bbl or something). Instead they create miserable situations for everyone and then virtue signal "at least I didn't publicize I had attraction standards!!!" as though that's a positive thing.

>>85268644
I never said anything about not being "sufficiently attracted," I'm saying attraction can supersede "I like big tits because of Ms Henderson in the 5th grade." Men can put that aside are often attracted to women outside their "type." Because for us it isn't a checklist, it is wishlist. Women seem to struggle with that concept.
>muh male adultery rate
lmao. I think it would be generous to say it is about 50/50. Or do you believe everyone answers those surveys honestly?

>>85268672
If true, probably more manipulation on her end, might've get left in the dust.

You can't expect someone who cheated on you to be honest about anything after that. She might've wanted to get more sex or money out of you, who knows, but she was dissatisfied enough to cheat in the first place (overwhelming majority of women cheat because of dissatisfaction and/or disengaged partner)

Either way I wouldn't take it at face value. Her behavior was self-explanatory though

>>85267705
I'm doing what I can to get a trans fembot I'm fake dating on discord to meet up with me so I can murder them lol

>>85268724
>Literally this is probably true.
women always failing to take accountability
>Your attraction to your partner is a HUGE deal,
I was. You're retarded. I didn't say she was ugly or I was not attracted to her. I said I didn't filter her out based on some "ideal body type".
I pretty much exclusively jerked off to nudes she sent me when I couldn't have sex with her.
women like you are ridiculous. you claim you want something deep but you start off with a shallow idea of "he has to be 5'10 - 6'". you fall in love with the person not the body. dumbass roastie.
even dudes that date fat girls say they fell in love with the person not the body.

>>85268175
All doable if you aren't some weird faghag that supports troons, given the thread we're in

File: 1000010003.jpg (165 KB, 709x938)

165 KB JPG

>>85268742
>not being "sufficiently attracted"
Literally my point about height. I know the height necessity for me personally to feel sufficiently attracted
>"I like big tits because of Ms Henderson in the 5th grade"
I never said anything along these lines. That would be like me bringing up a coworker I liked once who was 6'5" and saying I need that because of him. It's not true and indeed would be childish. But since it's not that, your comparison is retarded and moot.
>I think it would be generous to say it is about 50/50.
It is mostly men committing adultery. Men are also more likely to lie in socially desirable ways than women are. Both of these questions have been studied; you just live in an echo chamber

File: 1785787339875494.jpg (61 KB, 720x1000)

61 KB JPG

>>85267705
i am an autogynephilic troon but i know that i will be a KHHV forever anyways

>>85268365
Why did all the troons ignore this

>>85268791
>I didn't say she was ugly or I was not attracted to her.
So you were or weren't sufficiently attracted to her?
If you were sufficiently attracted, then none of this applies, and your "fat ass and big tits" thing wasn't necessary for you anyway... It means your point was retarded from the beginning since height is actually necessary for me to feel sufficient attraction, and I made that clear from the get-go.
If you weren't sufficiently attracted, all my points still stand, and it was wrong of you to date her.
>shallow idea of "he has to be 5'10 - 6'"
God you guys are fucking exhausting. No I don't want to be stuck making myself have sex with someone i am not attracted to for the rest of my life.
That is not the same as my partner not being perfect. There are nice things to have, but height is a necessity. I need to be aroused by my partner. If I'm not it'll be a miserable for both of us.

Let me dumb it down for you: if a fat ass and big tits didn't significantly get in the way of your sexual desire, it's not analogous to height for me. It's analogous to the guy being British, having hair, having a nice face, etc. -- those are preferences I can do without. Big tits and a fat ass now sound like things you can do without.

Height is not one I can go without, and it's exhausting explaining this to dumb moids with no theory of mind, who can't understand that women aren't turned on by just any guy and we have varying needs. We have types, and we go for those types, and it's why we generally cheat less in marriages

Funny how you didn't go after the race preference, only the height one too... For some reason this really pisses people off even though they're equally difficult to change aesthetically speaking. (If anything, race change is more expensive)

Maybe it's because more moiss on here understand the racial preference thing, because a lot of you have one, and you can't comprehend that others select based on different things.

>>85267705
>Any other trans fembots fear that they will never find a husband who will love and support them?
Why not find a woman? It worked out for my partner.

>>85268893
you know what this is gonna be my last reply to you and i'm not going to address your latest nonsense but i hope this serves as a reality check for you.
you, a regular woman, hijack some trannies thread who fears they will never find a husband with your own fears as if they are even comparable.
then you put forth some vague and shallow checklist that literally thousands of people in your area can probably fulfill which you are still not able to obtain. you don't really talk about who you are as a human being or who you want as a human being aside from the fact they want kids and are a "good boy" and how you want to rush into the relationship.
you then put the blame of my relationship ending on me even though it was the other person that cheated.
like every way you represent yourself in this thread is just kind of repulsive. you are not going to find a husband because of who you are as a person, not because men are not good or don't want kids or some other bullshit you've got in your head.

>>85268919
>shallow
Sure, it's shallow because it mentions some physical preferences among lots of other values/goals preferences. Suddenly it's shallow because I have any physical preference whatsoever that's outside of what you're personally okay with seeing.
>checklist
I gave this because I was literally asked what I wanted in a husband
>how you want to rush into the relationship.
Never said I wanted to rush. Said I didn't want him to delay things.
>you then put the blame of my relationship ending on me
I didn't do this, and my post could not be been clearer.
Reading comprehension, dude. You don't seem to get what I'm saying most of the time.
>way you represent yourself in this thread is just kind of repulsive
And you come off as not particularly bright. Your analogies don't make sense and don't apply. You blame me for answering questions I have been asked directly. You claim I blamed you for being cheated on, when I made very clear that I wasn't blaming you and what she did was shitty.
>won't find a husband
I might or might not, but I'm not going to settle for males with attitudes like yourself, who are so judgmental of others for being honest when asked what they want in a partner.
Many of us would rather be single than deal with moids who can't help but have a hissy fit whenever a woman politely answers what she is looking for in a partner.
>in your area
I prefer looking online and on 4chan, though I sometimes take a look in my area. It's full of normies though. I prefer 4chan connections.

>>85268811
you are missing the forest for the trees. My argument was that in our hypergamous world, men are more amenable when it comes to finding a partner (otherwise they will never) while women are much more rigid and unforgiving (because they can).
>your pic
Thanks ChatGPT or whatever, I'm totally believing those sources as unbaised. And even IF it is believable, "type of lie strongly depends on the specific topic." If a man lies on a survey for "self enhancement or desirability," what do women like about? Perhaps shame or fear of not being part of the in-group? Like, say, admiring adultery? Hmm...

OP if you are still around, sorry for derailing your thread. If you were even real

>>85269007
>I didn't do this
>I wasn't blaming you
>>85268724
>me: if she had big tits and a big ass i would have loved her better and she wouldn't have cheated
>you: Literally this is probably true.

absolute retard.

>>85268919
>>85269007
Also
>you don't really talk about who you are as a human being
I didn't give this because I wasn't asked.
>who they are
I gave several bullet points related to values and life goals like marriage, kids, moving in together, etc.
Sorry I didn't specify enough personality traits to your liking?
I only gave a couple of physical preferences, and I didn't give any income or wealth preferences. (Maybe if you stretch it, if they want me to move to them and offer to cover my bills, that's given as a possible plus, but not necessary, and I gave several other ways for things to work where they aren't paying my way at all.)
I don't think my post was shallow. You just can't handle the height thing specifically, for whatever reason (maybe you're short, or you have a short friend, or you're not short but you have a particular height insecurity, idk).

Not my problem anymore either way. I should keep in mind from now on to no longer explain basic concepts to certain moids who are willfully ignorant and just want to start a fight.

>>85269011
Adultery is about the self enhancement one. If anything surveys understate male adultery.
>men are more amenable when it comes to finding a partner
I have always said men should have stricter standards, and it's a point I've argued consistently for a long while. The reason we have to do all the selecting is because you guys refuse to.

>>85269038
Read that post again. It doesn't assign any blame. It just states a simple fact: that if you're more attracted to your partner, you're more likely to be engaged with them, and they're less likely to cheat on you.
It's the same thing for crime: if you don't leave your door unlocked in the hood, you're less likely to get robbed. If you told me you left your door unlocked in the hood, I'd say the same thing. And maybe you'd throw the same fit. Who knows.
It's not a hard concept to grasp. You just get easily offended at every turn.
Also you took it out of the context of my first post on the matter, which included these things and was extremely clear:
>Obviously I don't condone cheating. It's wrong and she should have just left you. [...] It was fucked up of her to cheat. At the same time you can reduce your risk of ending up in that situation, just like you can reduce your chances of being victimized by crime.

>>85268498
>openly saying you like something other than her
I would have hated to be this girl. It's the the best for both of you that it ended. I would never want to be talked about like this.
Sorry you got cheated on dude. Hopefully you'll find someone that's your type and who's respectable

>>85267705
>trans
>fem
i dont think so chief

>>85267717
How tall are you? And what is your income/job?

>>85269275
6'2, Biochemist

>>85269435
A little too short for me, sorry. And I like athletic men.
You will find your person soon, anon! Don't worry.

>>85269519
>biochemist = unathletic
How does that translate?

>>85267705
not trans but I don't worry about finding a husband, I'm already married