Undeniable proof that "inceldom" and the "blackpill" is nothing but a chud's nonsensical, pseudoscience. Now being out the copes as you deny the evidence right in front of you.
>>85271573We've gone over this before anon. Women like big and tall guys, even if they're fat and ugly and literally retarded. Lean, skinny, small-framed, and under 6ft tall men are the true blackpilled incels. Doubly so since nothing can be done to improove, no amount of bodybuilding or personality can change the fundamental structural difference that make us literally invisiabe to women, like they don't consider us even men at all and laugh at the idea that a short petite adult manlet actually thinks he has a chance breeding.
they will dismiss even the most egregious examples. the only way for them to see through it is purposefully looking for counter-examples, as their bias completely colors their worldviews, and they are blissfully unaware of how the brain works.
>>85271601One extremely bizarre outlier doesn't disprove an observable trend.
>>85271599Only 14.5% of men are 6 feet or taller, and 72% adults are in a romantic relationships, so the majority of women date men under 6 feet simply due to population distribution.
>>85271614there are plenty of outliers. i see couples all the time that disprove incel theory. "women only want chad anyway" is a cope.
drunk and high as fuck funnt thhing is here incel women who get no dick.. goon their pussies every night begging for dick. lol my ex in a nutshell still stalk her facebook no prospects ngl i miss her so much. she couldnt get men if she tried
>>85271629>here are plenty of outliers.Which, again, does not disprove an observable trend.
>>85271614>One extremely bizarre outlier doesn't disprove an observable trend.Yes it does. I've seen dwarves, cripples, and ugly people find love and pussy, the same ones that you chuds say that they're a hopeless cause. This is proof that it's not impossible but you chuds will instead cry and do nothing like little bitch faggots.
>>85271625The first statistic is objectively measured with tangible data, while the second is purely speculative junk science based on extrapolation of a self-reporting sample. My direct observation (as in actually being outside many different places and noticing patterns) is that 90% of women only want the top 10% of men size/looks/wealth/status wise.
>>85271641but your method has all the same problems the one you're criticizing. confirmation bias, selective attention, availability heuristic, and no controls. the brain in a negative confirmation loop is specifically good at noticing confirming instances and discounting disconfirming ones without being aware it's doing it. >72% of relationships this number comes from census and large scale survey data with sample sizes that dwarf anything observable in person. it is straightforward math: if only 14.5% of men are 6 feet or taller and 72% of adults are partnered, the majority of partnered women are mathematically with men under 6 feet. also, stated preferences and actual partner selection consistently diverge in studies on attraction. actual relationships show much less extreme selectivity than stated preferences predict. women say they want 6 feet, but women partner with men at average height in large numbers. both things are true simultaneously.i have sources if you want to look at them.
>>85271694No thanks sperglord
>>85271640>brooo this wealthy eceleb got ibto a relationship>its this easy brooo just be rich and famous
>>85271729great conversation, bud. all you have left to do is throw insults, so this is the last (You) i'll give you until you want to say something of substance.
>>85271573>a probably staged video of an outlier cases on the otherside of the world disproves a well established rule Thats not how it works and you know it
>>85271599I'm 6 feet tall and I keep hearing this but no woman has been interested in me my entire life. Where are these hordes of women begging to suck my cock simply because I'm tall? I'm not fat or disfigured either, just autistic.
>>85271747Not even an insult, just an observation about you, same way I am presenting my plain observations about human sexuality rather than citing questionable social "science" statistics.
>>85271750>hordes of women begging to suck my cock simply because I'm tall?It's rarely like that, maybe for gigachad, but if you are in social environments where there are eligible women, eventually some of them will take a liking to you simply because of your height.
>>85271750Same, 6ft2 never ever had a girl be into me whereasbsupposedly plenty of people should be lining up in front of me according to r9k
>>85271785I've been in plenty, no woman has ever flirted with me or signaled to me that she's into me. My entire life I've been treated like a repulsive retard. The few women I've asked out directly all turned me down. But tell me more about how easy it is for me.
>>85271771Yeah. I used to enjoy reading pop psych and soc books and magazines during high school. Then I studied these fields in college and was disappointed to learn that the methodology is mostly just doing self-reporting surveys and just extrapolating the results to come up with a theory that applies to everybody. The actual knowledge about human society is too politically incorrect to be included in academia and mainstream social science, I recall some profs even got cancelled for researching what actually makes men and women tick. Pic related was a huge redpill about women in the 2000s, and in the current year, blackpill incel literature has upended PUA because most men simply aren't dating or getting laid, things have changed. While in times before smartphone and dating app culture women would more happily settle for a man who was funny and had a good personality (hence why PUA actually worked), nowadays women just feel no attraction to the average man because they have unlimited options to pursue the kind of big tall rich guy they really want, even if it means being another side chick in a Chad harem.
>>85271804Have you ever approached a woman casually, like say I like your top or your hair smells nice?
>>85271846>your hair smells niceHow to get arrested 101No, I typically don't cold approach random women who haven't shown me any signals because I don't enjoy humiliating myself.
>>85271599>I have never had sex or been on a date>I am also an expert on what women like
>>85271846Nta but You know thats creep behavior right? Like borderline rape.
>>85271861>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXvuWfLF06A1. You are autistic and couldn't recognize the signals if they were there. Anyways it doesn't matter, can't tell you how many times a women felt cold and unapproachable, but I just said hi and then she seemed genuinely happy to talk to me.2. Rejection doesn't matter, you've probably heard that the guys who get the girls also got the most rejections cause they dared to ask and they don't give a fuck. So it's not a humiliation ritual, assuming you're not in high school anymore.3. A simple observational compliment about her clothing or hair isn't sexual harassment, even in the UK. Also I've learned that women expect to have their unusual hairstyle or clothing commented on, cause they're used to the attention and if they don't like it they'd stop wearing it. A general rule is to avoid talking about her body (other than hair or clothes), which is subtextually understood that noticing her dress is noticing her figure, but it errs on the safe side of definitely not sexual harassment. >I remember the sexual harassment presentation at work where they used the example that saying you're beautiful and asking someone out are free speech, totally different from saying nice tits wanna fuck.
>>85271895You know that's paranoid thinking right? You can compliment a woman and just walk away, never stop and stare like you expect a positive response otherwise you will get angry, that's the creepy behavior that makes women feel unsafe. Maybe that's an important part I left out, and the PUA stuff emphasized this as well. Never be imposing, but say your piece.
>>85271573His penguin pajamas look like stewie from family guy in motion.
>>85271916>You know that's paranoid thinking right?No thats what your average woman thinks. Ive never seen a woman who says she wants to muh approached, both my siblings, coworkers, absolutely despise that.>You can compliment a woman and just walk awayWhich is creep behavior>the PUA stuff emphasized this as well. Never be imposing, but say your piece.>following PUA grifters and harassing womenTop kek>inb4 thats not harassmentTalking to women is harassment if youre ugly. Also thats street harassment and illegal at least in my country
>>85271943I'm proud to be an American, where at Ieast l knwo l'm free.
>>85271899>muh signalsLitteraly no woman wants be be "approached". >you've probably heard that the guys who get the girls also got the most rejectionsNo, theyre just the most attractive>simple observational compliment about her clothing or hair isn't sexual harassmentIt is, women dont want to be complimented especially not without their consent. In my country, at least we have litteral government funded campains warning against never giving random compliments to women/harass women
>>85271961>never giving random compliments to womenMy country couldn't enforce such laws cause they'd be openly racist against niggers and jeets
the point is that the guy has a girlfriend because he's found something he's completely into that defines him. it's weird as fuck and probably the result of mental illness, but it ticked his girlfriend's boxes and so they're together.it's about having something that makes you stand out from others. it can be anything. if you are somebody, others will notice and want to be a part of it. it can be acting like a literal giant baby, or being a serial killer, or just collecting model trains, whatever. but as long as it makes you, you.there's a lesson here but I think some of you guys are overlooking it a little.
>>85271573The problem in general is the cuck relationship dynamic. For the relationship to not be cucked, the guy must be poorfag and the women need to cover theirs expenses equally. So the relationship flourish just like the economy. On top of that cheating is prohibited. The other issue is those men usually have a disorder and cannot marry because women are too stupid to acknowledge theirs existences without resorting toa. Get a job lazy bumb. Have a car.c. Be attractive and have money.Which prevent, Schizo, Autists and people from ever having love. Even though the person can financially live independently. Such is an issue.
>>85271975My countrys full of niggers too but idk if theyre reported of if thats considered racist
>>85271975>>85272077>racismyeah...fuck off to>>>/pol/
>>85271573molested af
>>85271573>>85272085aww nevermind i just finished the video this was super cute
>>85271573>just humiliate yourself bronah
>>85271640>not impossibleThere's an exception to virtual everything, yet, people still default to what's most likely to happen. You'd laugh any retard out the room for claiming some weird alternative healing remedy is the cure to all aliments despite their probably being at least a few anecdotes proving their case, simply because there's overwhelmingly examples to the contrary. Are there many valid arguments to be made against fatalist viewpoints that many adopt in BP circles? Sure. But the "look at these dozen or so gross guys in relationships" isn't one of them.
>>85272115*virtually everything My bad.
>>85271573To acquire a gf, you need at least one (but preferably more) of the following three things.1.Not ugly2.Charisma/generally sociable3.MoneyIf you see a man that doesn't have one of these things, but has a gf, chances are, he has at least one of the others.
>>85271573>nothing but a chud's nonsensical, pseudoscience.What illogical thought processes brought you to this conclusion? Countless studies show that people favor those with harmonious faces, and higher statures. Moreover, some basic thinking about evolutionary psychology and why we feel "love" in the first place should bring you to the conclusion that people want ATTRACTIVE partners and not UGLY partners. Funny thing is this is how things were for all of human existence, even nowadays, with people using words like "chopped" or "cooked" or "mid" or "chud".What you're saying is LITERALLY the opposite of science. The blackpill has scientific backing. The bluepill doesn't.>>85271629> there are plenty of outliers. i see couples all the time that disprove incel theory.Where the hell do you live? I see ugly dudes with girls too but the girl is always looksmatched to him being some type of hiplet or having a horrible side profile.>>85271640>I've seen plenty of people on the news win the lottery! It's proof that winning the lottery is possible!Retard
>see the extreme outlier cases of mental illness?? Pfft, yeah. Totally invalidates the normOk
>>85272979>see the bl*ckpill unequivocally destroyed on tape>IT DOESN'T COUNT
>>85271573I already said that multiple times, but just be White and tall.
>>85271640Unironically it's probably easier for an actual straight up dwarf to get laid than a manlet
>>85272151>Countless studies show that *chud babble*, . Moreover, some basic thinking about *chud babble*you sound like a fag !I've seen more pretty girls dating ugly dudes irl than I've seen the opposite. you can twist stats about something that is basically immeasurable all you want but as soon as you step outside none of it is real.
>>85273141>all you want but as soon as you step outside none of it is real.Not really, if anything you'll be more blackpilled looking at couples as only the attractive or visibly rich guys manage to date
>>85273021>look at this eceleb living on the other side of the earth, theres a woman with him on this video>checkmate incels you have no excuses Are you this retarded or just baiting?
>>85271573>even a fat degenerate faggot waste of a human being has a gf caring for him and supporting his fetishGrim if true
>>85271599I am tired of you larping manlet retards. Literally every "short truecel" had a GF by high school
