one of the craftiest tricks the foid cartel ever pulled off is conflating "what women find attractive" with "predictors of longitudinal stability in romantic partnerships". whatever they tell you or whatever survey or study they produce things like "emotional openness" do NOT create romantic or sexual attraction, they are susceptibility factors that parasites exploit during symbiosis. keep your eyes peeled for this tricknology brothers
>>85275043Keeping my eyes peeled, yes sir!
>>85275043i mean, yeah, conflating them does produce confused advice, but you're building an unsupported conspiratorial conclusion on top of it.short term mate selection does weight physical cues more heavily because they're seen quickly. long term pair bonding weights things like emotional availability, reliability, and reciprocal investment more heavily because those are the traits that determine whether living with someone for decades is sustainable.what you're saying requires women to be consciously or unconsciously running a strategy of securing a partner through emotional manipulation and then withdrawing once locked in. for example, the research on relationship dissolution shows women initiating divorce more frequently, which is the opposite of what a successful parasitic lock-in strategy would produce. parasites don't voluntarily leave the host.people find different things attractive at different relationship stages because different things actually matter at different stages, and this applies to both sexes rather than being a female-specific manipulation strategy. men also present differently during courtship than in long term relationships, which you aren't framing as tricknology.
>>85275043The secret to a happy and healthy long term relationship is to beat your wife when she is out of line so she can appreciate the moments you arent beating her.
