[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Elaina.jpg (110 KB, 675x540)
110 KB JPG
Unironically modern anti natalism is pretty valid. Imagine bring a child to this current timeline only for them to growup into some extreme degenerate, thot, fag, troon etc.
>>
>>85275719
Parenting skill issue
>>
My daughter is gonna be raised like a boy to avoid this issue
>>
>>85275722
Not really. Just how much control do modern parents have on what their children consume in the internet or who they interact with or taught from outside by the media and institutions. Don't deny you didn't do things that your parents didn't want you to do. You can't control all those factors when your environment is up against you. It also doesn't help when current female partners are very progressive aligned that makes parenting direction even harder. Things will only get much worse with time.
>>
>>85275719
If you are high general intelligence and possess other positive cognitive traits, then having many children is one of the best things you can do for the future of the world.
>>
File: 1784916454257421.jpg (126 KB, 627x1200)
126 KB JPG
>>85275782
Ah not the first time I heard this and how bad that went
>>
>>85275762
You're too much pornbrained
>>
Curse it
>>
yes, yes, don't have kids. Less competition for my kids.
>only for them to growup into some extreme degenerate, thot, fag, troon etc.
At least I'll be prepared to manage that since i'm a degenerate fag kinda-sorta-troon and my wife is goonette.
But, in practice, my kids are way more normalfags than I was at their age. It probably helps that I know where the real dangers lie and keep them safe from that.
>>85275780
>Just how much control do modern parents have on what their children consume in the internet or who they interact with or taught from outside by the media and institutions
You'd be surprised how much control parents CAN have.
My kids have dumb phones. The home wifi is policed very vigorously by me. Their laptops have intentional surveillance that I actually audit. The school tablet has modified software (by me) and can't connect to the internet (only the school's LAN).
Will I be able to keep this control indefinitely? No, of course not. But I'm also slowly introducing them to the risks and slowly trusting them more.
A lot of it is parental laziness. Normalfags rail against degenerate fags like me online but then the exact same normalfags at PTA meetings laud my kids and ask me how I do it. And the conservative very-christian mothers are very concerned with what I use/do to looks so youthful as a guy but are never concerned how their daughters are on a fast train to whoredom.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.