why should i as a tall man (6'5, top 0.18% of male height) waste my tall genes on a short bitch? my kids will end up manlets and get bullied and rejected their entire lives. i need at least a 5'11 bitch, anything less and she has to be stunning and sexy af
>>85275940Not sure is fair enough. But 5'11" is also outlier height tier.You might be able to bag one, but that limits your dating pool way more than using a more normal cutoff for tall.
>>85275940That's a valid way of looking at genetics and the future viability of your offspring. There really is no reason to waste your tall genes on a short bitch if you feel that way.
>>852759895'11 is top 0.18% of female height so thats why i said that specifically
But imagine a living onahole.
>>85276003Pretty much the same answer to any similar "Why shouldn't I get another extreme outlier like myself?" Question.It limits your options a lot and makes it so you can't he as selective on other qualities, especially depending on how attractive your other qualities are
>>85276071im 6'5 so i have options. im willing to allow 5'9 or above if shes a baddie
>>85276091Why make the thread then? Who do you need to convince of your standards?Your standard is taller than me, which is fine ofc. But tons of moids like to hate on me for having any height standard at all. They seem to be gentler on you though, since you're male. (I pretend to be male in here sometimes if I want decent advice and sympathy.)
>>85275940short women are repulsive unless they are into ageplay kinks and willing to be little kids for you otherwise my preference is just 5'8-5'10 or so blonde women with little makeup and bulkier feminine builds
>>85276472Interesting to see these posts, but they prove what I often try to tell guys: tall men like tall women.I'm about 5'7" though and never been rejected (at least to my knowledge) for being too short.But some guys really like 'em tall I suppose. Everyone has their type
